• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

American revivalism and Teetotalism

evangelist6589

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I just learned something I did not know from a Reformed Baptist friend. Teetotalism is a recent position coming from the 19th century and a product of American revivalism just like the altar call. True or false? I am no historian so I wonder what book he got this fact from.

I usually do not buy print books but I just got Drinking with Calvin and Luther brand new for $20. This book is out of print so I got a steal.
 
Last edited:

Jerome

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I just learned something I did not know from a Reformed Baptist friend. Teetotalism is a recent position coming from the 19th century and a product of American revivalism just like the altar call. True or false? I am no historian so I wonder what book he got this fact from.

Does your Reformed Baptist friend have a Bible?

From Jeremiah chapter 35
But they said, We will drink no wine: for Jonadab the son of Rechab our father commanded us, saying, Ye shall drink no wine, neither ye, nor your sons for ever
And Jeremiah said unto the house of the Rechabites, Thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Because ye have obeyed the commandment of Jonadab your father, and kept all his precepts, and done according unto all that he hath commanded you: Therefore thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Jonadab the son of Rechab shall not want a man to stand before me for ever.
 

Jerome

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Here you go, from last December:

http://www.crosswalk.com/blogs/reli...ion-advocate-r-c-sproul-arrested-for-dui.html
R. C. Sproul, Jr. has been arrested for DUI--a fact that is ironic given his advocacy for drinking alcohol in moderation.

Sproul was arrested and charged with “operating a vehicle while intoxicated” and “operating a vehicle with an alcohol concentration equivalent to .15 or more,” in addition to driving under the influence with a minor as a passenger.

He even wrote the forward to the book Drinking with Calvin and Luther: A History of Alcohol in the Church
 

evangelist6589

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oh for the love of the gremlin!

I just ordered the book "The Christian and drinking" using the scripture to defend total absence from alcohol. I will give the other side a fair read.
 

Rob_BW

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Does your Reformed Baptist friend have a Bible?

From Jeremiah chapter 35
Well, what about verse 9? Am I also not supposed to build a house, and to live in a tent? That was a part of their father's command also, so why leave it out?
 

rlvaughn

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I just learned something I did not know from a Reformed Baptist friend. Teetotalism is a recent position coming from the 19th century and a product of American revivalism just like the altar call. True or false? I am no historian so I wonder what book he got this fact from.
I've not studied the connections between "teetotalism" and revivalism, so I can't really speak to that. But here are two factors to consider:

In reading old church records in the 1800s, to me the push seems to be against drunkenness and excess rather than for total abstinence. In a book that Jerome linked in another thread, I noticed a reference to a Baptist preacher changing his views on intoxicating drink. Click HERE.

The other is that the views of my Primitive Baptist friends on liquor are like what you see in some of the older church records -- against drunkenness and excess but not against drinking -- not teetotalism. Historically they were not much affected by American revivalism.

I don't think there should be much doubt that the position of Baptists in the U.S. on drinking/drunkenness was influenced by the Temperance Movement. I guess the argument is very one thinks it was a good or bad thing.

Interesting fact: Texas Southern Baptist leader J.B.B. Cranfill once ran as the Vice-Presidential candidate of the Prohibition Party (1892).
 
Last edited:

rsr

<b> 7,000 posts club</b>
Moderator
Revivalism (particular in its Holiness phase) was an influence, but hardly the only one.

Temperance began as a middle-class movement among the new middle class, that is, primarily among the entrepreneurs and commercial classes. A drunken farmer behind a plow may be a pitiable sight, but there's a limit to the damage he can do (usually). A drunken mill worker or an inebriated clerk can make mistakes that can cost lives, reduce productivity and make bookkeeping errors that can sink a business.

The rise of the middle class in the Victorian era — on both sides of the Atlantic — increased demands for temperance, and it was only a matter of time that temperance became prohibition. And, yes, temperance societies adopted the methods of the revivalists: religious ardour and public spectacle.

And anti-foreign sentiment also played a part. Alcoholism came to be considered a particular vice of the big cities and, you guessed it, the Irish in particular. Something had to be done to civilize the Irish, and cutting off their alcohol was a good start. Prohibition became a stamp of "true" Protestantism, as opposed to the habits of the degenerate papists.

Add to that the industrialization of alcohol in the late 19th century. Alcohol was once an expensive commodity, but industrialization made it cheap and more accessible. Not only that, giant beer brewers (making use of new-fangled refrigeration) flooded the cities with cheap beer served at their own bars. That created an explosion of taverns in the large cities as the brewers jostled for market share. They were everywhere.

It was not for nothing that Presbyterian minister Samuel Burchard described the Democratic Party as the party of “rum, Romanism, and rebellion,” which ended up costing H.G. Blaine the presidential election in 1884.

Some ramblings that may or may not be worth considering.
 

TCassidy

Late-Administator Emeritus
Administrator
Billy Sunday made a ministry out of attacking the liquor industry, as did J. Frank Norris.
 

evangelist6589

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Revivalism (particular in its Holiness phase) was an influence, but hardly the only one.

Temperance began as a middle-class movement among the new middle class, that is, primarily among the entrepreneurs and commercial classes. A drunken farmer behind a plow may be a pitiable sight, but there's a limit to the damage he can do (usually). A drunken mill worker or an inebriated clerk can make mistakes that can cost lives, reduce productivity and make bookkeeping errors that can sink a business.

The rise of the middle class in the Victorian era — on both sides of the Atlantic — increased demands for temperance, and it was only a matter of time that temperance became prohibition. And, yes, temperance societies adopted the methods of the revivalists: religious ardour and public spectacle.

And anti-foreign sentiment also played a part. Alcoholism came to be considered a particular vice of the big cities and, you guessed it, the Irish in particular. Something had to be done to civilize the Irish, and cutting off their alcohol was a good start. Prohibition became a stamp of "true" Protestantism, as opposed to the habits of the degenerate papists.

Add to that the industrialization of alcohol in the late 19th century. Alcohol was once an expensive commodity, but industrialization made it cheap and more accessible. Not only that, giant beer brewers (making use of new-fangled refrigeration) flooded the cities with cheap beer served at their own bars. That created an explosion of taverns in the large cities as the brewers jostled for market share. They were everywhere.

It was not for nothing that Presbyterian minister Samuel Burchard described the Democratic Party as the party of “rum, Romanism, and rebellion,” which ended up costing H.G. Blaine the presidential election in 1884.

Some ramblings that may or may not be worth considering.

How do you know so much? A very helpful post.
 

rsr

<b> 7,000 posts club</b>
Moderator
When Baptists were moving west and south in the early 19th century, it was common (and an economic necessity) to convert grain into alcohol. Many Baptists were involved in the Whiskey Rebellion because they were accustomed to bartering whiskey for other goods and had no cash to pay the taxes.

There are records of Baptist associational meetings being disturbed by too many draws at the keg. And while prohibitionism made great strides among Baptists after the Civil War, there were dissenters.

"In February 1887 the Tennessee Temperance Alliance held a convention in Nashville to organize county committees statewide to generate public support for the amendment when presented to the voters for the final referendum. Methodist, Baptist, and Presbyterian churches participated in the campaign. In Morgan County, for example, Reverend A. B. Wright, a circuit rider in the Upper Cumberland region, served as chairman. For two weeks, he made speeches in favor of the prohibition amendment to groups assembled in schoolhouses and churches. When he arrived at an engagement scheduled at the Baptist Church in Sunbright, he discovered the preacher and his father had 'locked us out,' and he was forced to speak at a nearby building."
 

Squire Robertsson

Administrator
Administrator
Many factors lead to the popular adoption of the total abstinence position.
  • Alcohol was the crack cocaine of the Victorian and Edwardian periods.
  • Women and children didn't have the legal protections from drunkard spouses and fathers they have today.
  • The anti-foreigner sentiment was directed not only at the "whiskey drinking" Irish but also at the "beer drinking" Germans (many from Catholic Bavaria) and the "wine drinking" Italians and Jews.
 

rsr

<b> 7,000 posts club</b>
Moderator
Many factors lead to the popular adoption of the total abstinence position.
  • Alcohol was the crack cocaine of the Victorian and Edwardian periods.
  • Women and children didn't have the legal protections from drunkard spouses and fathers they have today.
  • The anti-foreigner sentiment was directed not only at the "whiskey drinking" Irish but also at the "beer drinking" Germans (many from Catholic Bavaria) and the "wine drinking" Italians and Jews.
I would agree with that. I should have mentioned the Germans (who created the national beer industry) but I excluded the Italians (and the Slavs and Jews) because they largely came after the Temperance movement was already in full swing. However, they probably played a role in the final "victory" of Prohibition, so I should have included them. Just trying to not overreach.
 

Steven Yeadon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
In church history I discovered that the major progressive movements in America have been led by the church in some way through to Civil Rights in the 50s and 60s.

From the top of my head, as I had a hard time finding this stuff on Wikipedia, it all started with the abolitionists who advocated an end to slavery. They were a minority voice in the church at first, but gained power over decades leading up to the Civil War. The abolitionists believed in a set of issues in fact that included women's rights and prohibition form the very beginning though.

When slavery ended, Christian social reformers next tackled giving black men basic rights. Then came women's suffrage. Then came Temperance and the constitutional amendment that ended the sale of alcohol, Prohibition. Christian progressivism was dealt a serious blow when prohibition ended. However, later Martin Luther King Jr. assembled another primarily church-led progressive movement to end segregation and advocate civil rights for people of color.

Now I must state that I have an issue with all of this. Namely that these movements seem to rely more on a social gospel than evangelism. I also do not know if these social reform movements led by the church are tied to revivalism. Probably the best evidence for it being part of revivalism though, may be looking at the Salvation Army's creation in England. I also have a serious issue with these progressive movements in terms of theology. Teetotalism on all things that can ensnare into sin if given into in excess is not found in the bible. Instead we find self-control and a kind of liberty for the Believer as long as they conform to Acts 15:23-29 . In addition, the women's suffrage movement did some terrible things such as liberalize all U.S. divorce laws, ending any idea of covenant marriage legally, and advocated an idea of a feminist approach to the bible that is simply put a doctrine of demons to me.

To be genuinely super-radical though I will also proffer that perhaps even slavery in a form advocated by Philemon is in fact biblical. Of course, the American South failed to enact Philemon though. In fact, I can even go so far as the American Founding: where in the bible do we find human rights other than things regarding genuine fair play such as providing a workman his wage?
 
Top