An Orthodox view of a Fundamentalist

[Martin]

Still Waiting on Majoala

Majoala,

I am still waiting on your answers to my comments/questions.

Note that I said "your" answers, not a cut and paste answer from a person who is not on this board.

Thank You.

 

[tragic_pizza]

Wow, good to hear that you're not that liberal after all.

I'm too liberal for the conservatives, and too conservative for the liberals... some of us comfort the afflicted, you see, and others of us afflict the comfortable.

:tongue3:

 

[Martin]

Still Waiting

Majoala,

I am still waiting on your answers to my comments/questions.

Note that I said "your" answers, not a cut and paste answer from a person who is not on this board.

Thank You.

 

[John of Japan]

Me, too, Martin!:thumbs:

 

[mojoala]

My point will be addressed in another post concerning these missing books.

 

[Martin]

My point will be addressed in another post concerning these missing books.

==What missing books? I thought this discussion was about the Gospels and the New Testament. That is how it started out anyway and that is what I was responding to. Are you changing the subject? Why start another post? Why not just reply to what I said?

 

[mojoala]

You know, I don't know what the orginal question was as opposed the post. The OP was from someone else on another forum. So his thoughts are not neccesarily mine.

the Mojoala said: should be fundiefighter said:

 

[Martin]

You know, I don't know what the orginal question was as opposed the post. The OP was from someone else on another forum. So his thoughts are not neccesarily mine.

the Mojoala said: should be fundiefighter said:

I am confused now. You posted it. You don't know what you posted?

 

[mojoala]

That's about it. I posted it because it was unusal. The other forums I have visited rarely have a member from the Eastern Orthodox respond. I just thought it was interesting and posted it.

The problem with this forum is that people don't read a post thorougly before shooting off at the mouth. If you noticed at all, I claimed it to be written by somebody else.

I may have failed to mention that I neither agree or disagree with it. I just thought it to be post-worthy.

 

[Martin]

That's about it. I posted it because it was unusal. The other forums I have visited rarely have a member from the Eastern Orthodox respond. I just thought it was interesting and posted it.

The problem with this forum is that people don't read a post thorougly before shooting off at the mouth. If you noticed at all, I claimed it to be written by somebody else.

I may have failed to mention that I neither agree or disagree with it. I just thought it to be post-worthy.

First I was not "shooting off at the mouth" I was responding to the untruthful and misleading claims of the article you posted.

Second I was aware that you did not write the OP (see my comments). However I did assume, since you did not say otherwise, that you agreed with the position of the OP (and the reply you posted).

Third, you quoted several older documents (etc) that I am not sure have anything to do with the OP. I am still trying to figure that one out.

Fourth, you then started talking about "missing books". I am not totally sure I know what missing books you are talking about or how those missing books relate to the OP (or replies).

So you must understand why I am a bit confused here. If you do not agree with the OP (and the reply you posted) then why did you not say that earlier?

 

[tragic_pizza]

Also, one might need to consult the TOS about all that cutting-and-pasting from "another forum."