• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

And now for the "why don't"s...

DojoGrant

New Member
Originally posted by tulpje:
By the way, there was a Cathic Biship there as well. Oprah's "Prayer for America" at Yankee Stadium. It's a lie to tell people that Jesus Christ is the same god as Allah!
Catholics have never said that "Jesus Christ is the same god as Allah." You pulled that from your own brain. The Catechism says that Muslims acknoledge God the creator. First off, this would be referring to God the Father, not God the Son. Second off, the Catechism never says that it is the same God, but that we have common ground that will someday hopefully lead to more common ground (converting Muslims to Christianity). Stop reading stuff in.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
WHEW! This thread reminds me of a movie I saw as a kid...

Gunfight at OK Corral.

HankD
 

DojoGrant

New Member
Originally posted by tulpje:
I am not going to argue with you. I have not read the confessions. I do not know what is in there exactly. If what you are saying is true, then we indeed threw out these errors. No we do not have the same doctrine as the LCMS. Three very big noticable differences would be:
1)woman's sufferage. In our church woman have no authority over men
2)The Office of Holy Ministry
3)Fellowship
4)Boy Scouts
5)Closed communion(not strictly held to)
There are many many issues that divide us. If you just look at the whold Dave Benke issue that is easy to see. We would never attend a service like that. It goes beyond unionism to syncretism. Jesus Christ was prayed to as if he were the same and equal to allah! That is a tragic shame! Unfortunately, the LCMS is heading down the same road as the ELCA. Does that mean that we ahere to the confessions more? No! That means that we abide by the word of God. I am not going to argue with you all day. You are obviously are a lost and condemned person.
You just condemned me and slandered against the LCMS church. You have shown no evidence of the LCMS Church becoming anything like the ELCA, so that statement is wholly unjustified. Furthermore, the issues separating the WELS and LCMS that you listed have nothing to do with what we are talking about. Boy Scouts? Please relate THAT to the discussion at hand.

Furthermore, I have never condemned anyone, especially you. I love you, and God loves you, and I admire your fervent faith. You make bold accusations that are often not accompanied with any evidence, or are rather mean-spirited (as Clint even pointed out). Whoever, the WELS considers Catholics as Christian brethren, and the Catholic Church considers Lutherans their Christian brethren.

How then are you condemning me? That really, really hurts me.
 
T

tulpje

Guest
ok ok ok!!! you're right about the dates! i was WRONG! okay!!!! Golly! :rolleyes: :eek:
 

DojoGrant

New Member
I apologize to anyone offended by the way this thread has moved. I do promise you that I'm not sitting her just spouting stuff off. With each question that is posed or quote that is quoted, I'm looking it up. This has been a wonderful learning experience for me. I've learned quite a bit about the WELS in the process. However, Tulpje has been making very hasty statements about my beliefs which have no ground. She will not deny that the Pope is the anti-Christ and that her church has the correct teachings on this...but she has never read of the Lutheran Confessions? I firmly believe that any Lutheran who is going to debate needs to know full well what their own church teaches. I don't come on here without a copy of the Confessions, two Bibles (Protestant and Catholic Canon), and the Catholic Catechism.

I do not agree with unsupported statements such as these, and I will defend them as best as possible. I will not tolerate mean-spirited things when they are full of logical holes, because that's not fair to the people who hold the beliefs that someone is condemning.

Again, I apologize to Tulpje, and I do not think that she is either lost or condemned. Where all here because we seek the truth. We all differ on the truth as well, but that doesn't mean we should condemn one another for it.
 
T

tulpje

Guest
Originally posted by DojoGrant:
Originally posted by tulpje:
I am not going to argue with you. I have not read the confessions. I do not know what is in there exactly. If what you are saying is true, then we indeed threw out these errors. No we do not have the same doctrine as the LCMS. Three very big noticable differences would be:
1)woman's sufferage. In our church woman have no authority over men
2)The Office of Holy Ministry
3)Fellowship
4)Boy Scouts
5)Closed communion(not strictly held to)
There are many many issues that divide us. If you just look at the whold Dave Benke issue that is easy to see. We would never attend a service like that. It goes beyond unionism to syncretism. Jesus Christ was prayed to as if he were the same and equal to allah! That is a tragic shame! Unfortunately, the LCMS is heading down the same road as the ELCA. Does that mean that we ahere to the confessions more? No! That means that we abide by the word of God. I am not going to argue with you all day. You are obviously are a lost and condemned person.
You just condemned me and slandered against the LCMS church. You have shown no evidence of the LCMS Church becoming anything like the ELCA, so that statement is wholly unjustified. Furthermore, the issues separating the WELS and LCMS that you listed have nothing to do with what we are talking about. Boy Scouts? Please relate THAT to the discussion at hand.

Furthermore, I have never condemned anyone, especially you. I love you, and God loves you, and I admire your fervent faith. You make bold accusations that are often not accompanied with any evidence, or are rather mean-spirited (as Clint even pointed out). Whoever, the WELS considers Catholics as Christian brethren, and the Catholic Church considers Lutherans their Christian brethren.

How then are you condemning me? That really, really hurts me.
[/QUO

I am right about the POPE being THE Antichrist )ith a capitol A)I am right about a lot of things yet you refuse to hear. Why?
Matthew 13
14In them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah:
" 'You will be ever hearing but never understanding;
you will be ever seeing but never perceiving.
15For this people's heart has become calloused;
they hardly hear with their ears,
and they have closed their eyes.
Otherwise they might see with their eyes,
hear with their ears,
understand with their hearts
and turn, and I would heal them.'[1] 16But blessed are your eyes because they see, and your ears because they hear.

John 8
47He who belongs to God hears what God says. The reason you do not hear is that you do not belong to God."
 

Pauline

New Member
tulpje,
You are wrong about the pope being the anti-Christ and you are wrong on much about Catholicism. If you are going to debate other's beliefs and practices, you at least need to understand what they truly do teach and practice.
Pauline
 

DojoGrant

New Member
Originally posted by tulpje:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by DojoGrant:
Originally posted by tulpje:
I am not going to argue with you. I have not read the confessions. I do not know what is in there exactly. If what you are saying is true, then we indeed threw out these errors. No we do not have the same doctrine as the LCMS. Three very big noticable differences would be:
1)woman's sufferage. In our church woman have no authority over men
2)The Office of Holy Ministry
3)Fellowship
4)Boy Scouts
5)Closed communion(not strictly held to)
There are many many issues that divide us. If you just look at the whold Dave Benke issue that is easy to see. We would never attend a service like that. It goes beyond unionism to syncretism. Jesus Christ was prayed to as if he were the same and equal to allah! That is a tragic shame! Unfortunately, the LCMS is heading down the same road as the ELCA. Does that mean that we ahere to the confessions more? No! That means that we abide by the word of God. I am not going to argue with you all day. You are obviously are a lost and condemned person.
You just condemned me and slandered against the LCMS church. You have shown no evidence of the LCMS Church becoming anything like the ELCA, so that statement is wholly unjustified. Furthermore, the issues separating the WELS and LCMS that you listed have nothing to do with what we are talking about. Boy Scouts? Please relate THAT to the discussion at hand.

Furthermore, I have never condemned anyone, especially you. I love you, and God loves you, and I admire your fervent faith. You make bold accusations that are often not accompanied with any evidence, or are rather mean-spirited (as Clint even pointed out). Whoever, the WELS considers Catholics as Christian brethren, and the Catholic Church considers Lutherans their Christian brethren.

How then are you condemning me? That really, really hurts me.
[/QUO

I am right about the POPE being THE Antichrist )ith a capitol A)I am right about a lot of things yet you refuse to hear. Why?
Matthew 13
14In them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah:
" 'You will be ever hearing but never understanding;
you will be ever seeing but never perceiving.
15For this people's heart has become calloused;
they hardly hear with their ears,
and they have closed their eyes.
Otherwise they might see with their eyes,
hear with their ears,
understand with their hearts
and turn, and I would heal them.'[1] 16But blessed are your eyes because they see, and your ears because they hear.

John 8
47He who belongs to God hears what God says. The reason you do not hear is that you do not belong to God."
</font>
Your first verse makes an excellent case for Catholicism. You are the one who turned away, closed your eyes, put your hands to your ears, and condemned the Catholic Church. Catholics, on the other hand, see with perfect clarity what confuses the living daylights out of you.

Same for the second verse. Read our thread from an objective point of view. You've called me names, admitted you dont' know the Confessions, and condemned me personally. Who isn't hearing?
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dear Tulpje,

I am a former Catholic and have caused Catholics on the BB a goodly amount of grief.

OK, you have made a strong case for the OFFICE of pope as antichrist.

Allow me to play the Devil's Advocate (so to speak).

What are the ONLY places in the Scripture where the word "antichrist" is used and defined by a specific criteria?

1 John 2: 22 Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.
23 Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: (but) he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.

Has any Pope ever denied that "Jesus is the Christ"?

1 John 4:3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.

2 John 7 For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.

Has any Pope ever denied that "Jesus Christ is come in the flesh"?

This is not however, to excuse those certain popes who have done or allowed exceeding wickedness upon humanity in times past.

HankD

[ March 11, 2002, 10:58 AM: Message edited by: HankD ]
 

Pauline

New Member
HankD,
Thank you for that well-stated post and for taking a fair and logical stance in regard to the Catholic Church. You just gave me a valuable lesson in Catholic apologetics concerning this topic.

tulpje,
Why don't you read Hank's post and the Scripture passages quoted there, then give us documentation showing that a pope has ever taught against those passages of Holy Scripture. And, if your assertion is that all popes have been and are the anti-Christ, then you must provide documentation showing us that they have all taught against those statements about the anti-Christ in Scripture. I look forward to your reply on this subject.

Pauline

[ March 11, 2002, 12:51 PM: Message edited by: Pauline ]
 

Mrs C

New Member
Originally posted by tulpje:
If you WANT Carole, I CAN get into an argument about how the ELCA rejects scripture and the confessions. Unfortunately, 2/3 of all Lutherans are represented by this hetrodox church body. ELCA is not the church that Martin Luther founded or intended. It is a sad, true reality.
And no Lutheran Church is what Christ founded or intended. It is a sad, true reality.

And Jeanie the only thing I want from you is for your computer to get sucked into a black hole. If I want intelligent discourse you are the last person on the face of the earth I would seek out.

In fact, Carole, you are like the two faces of Eve. Last I knew, before you became a Muslim, you adhered to the historical-critical method of interpreting scripture and denied that the only way of salvation was through Christ alone. Isn't this what the Catholic church teaches also?
Jeanie/Jean Marie/Mary/Mary Grace/Tulpje (and the list grows) I wouldn't start in on the multiple personalities idea if I were you.

And you can't even present WELS doctrine correctly. Let's not try to venture into Catholic doctrine. You're bound to really mess that up.

Carole
 

Mrs C

New Member
Originally posted by Pauline:
tulpje,
You are wrong about the pope being the anti-Christ and you are wrong on much about Catholicism. If you are going to debate other's beliefs and practices, you at least need to understand what they truly do teach and practice.
Pauline
Pauline -

She hasn't even been Lutheran for more than a year or two at most. She's been WELS for less than 4 months.

She doen't have a clue as to what her own church teaches, let alone what the Catholic Church's teachings are.

Carole
 

Deacon's Son

New Member
Hi all,

A week or two ago, on another thread, there was a really nasty tone evident in alot the banter. People were being downright hateful to one another in the tone and content of their posts.

To be honest, in that particular situation, the most alarming fact was that one of the people with some of the most venom-filled, anti-Catholic posts was a Moderator! That was certainly not encouraging to any of us non-Baptist guests.

Anyway, the point is that I appealed to those posting on that particular thread to please take a deep breath before posting and think about the fact that there are probably many "seekers" who visit this board. I make that same appeal here.

I think we should be mindful of the fact that if we are concentrating on attacking and belittling one another's beliefs and points of view on nominally important doctrines, we are doing a disservice to the name of Christ.

We are all old enough to know that no amount of arguing or finger-pointing is going to change any of our minds.

Sure, healthy discussion and friendly disagreement are both enjoyable and neccessary to bring us together in Christ, despite our differences of opinions on some doctrines. But when a particular line of discourse leaves the realm of edyfication and delves into childish bickering, we are no longer "putting on Christ" for the seeking visitors to this board, but are, instead, better serving the wishes of the Advocate, who wants nothing more than to see us, the body of Christ, present a divided front.

If Baptist Christians and non-Baptist Christians were the only visitors to this board, I would not be so concerned. But we all know that this is just not the case. We must keep in mind that whatever we post here, may be read by one seeking Christ and some of the posts here are not what I hope a person like that would use to form their opinions about our Redeemer and the effect that he has on our lives.

May God bless our efforts to point others to Christ, and may he hinder our efforts to point fingers at each other.

Just food for thought.

God Bless.

IOA,
Deacon's Son

[ March 11, 2002, 05:30 PM: Message edited by: Deacon's Son ]
 

Sir Ed

New Member
On behalf of Lutherans, I would like to apologize about tulpje. Just like any convert to any denomination or religion, she is a bit "over the top" at times.
 

rsr

<b> 7,000 posts club</b>
Moderator
Deacon's Son said:
Anyway, the point is that I appealed to those posting on that particular thread to please take a deep breath before posting and think about the fact that there are probably many "seekers" who visit this board.
Point well taken.

I posted in response to one of the questions but quickly saw that the thread was whizzing away, to no one's edification. I suspect that many visitors don't post for that reason.
 
Top