Edward Fudge wrote an interesting book on this subject called, The Fire that Consumes. He makes a good case for annihilation.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Does it help anything to list the guys name + his terminal degree + the school from which he receieved it?
Just askin'
God gave us a better book that refutes annihilation.Edward Fudge wrote an interesting book on this subject called, The Fire that Consumes. He makes a good case for annihilation.
Well, he is making unbelievers who reject his appeal to be reconciled to suffer for all eternity, is he not? That is the punishment he decided upon, isn't it? I agree that it is because of their rejection of God, not His rejection of them (as Calvinism ultimately teaches in their doctrine of unconditional election), but still it is God who decides what their punishment would be and that is what I'm pondering in this sentence.
That is not what the bible clearly teaches:This is a very clear example of why your human-centered Arminianism doesn't really work. We do not suffer hell because of our rejection of His appeal to reconciliation. We suffer hell because we are born dead in our sin.
Calvinism removes that clarity and understanding with their doctrine of "Total Depravity" and gives men back a perfect excuse. "I could not understand because I wasn't regenerated." "I could not clearly see because the gospel must be 'spiritually discerned' and I'm just a 'natural man.'"
Arminians also believe in total depravity.
Arminians also believe in total depravity.
But we're talking about annihilationism here. Arminian thought won't help or hinder that discussion. Here, one is either liberal or true to the Scriptures.
Seems unbelievable God would burn people alive for all eternity... think about it... all eternity. This idea goes agianst the concept of a loving, merciful God.
I believe it to be symbolic, eternal destruction, no hope of a resurrection for those in the second death.
No where in God's Word have sinners been tortured by God, killed yes, consumed by fire, yes, never tortured.
Why the symbolism of fire? Fire completely destroys.
Why eternal? No hope of resurrection.
Acts 2:25-27 / Rev 20:13, 14
Except that mercy was offered to everyone prior to hell and men chose to reject that mercy anyway. So it is completely in line with a merciful and loving God. Eternal torment is literal and any other teaching contrary to that is very grievous and shameful. For it distorts the wrath and justice of God, overlooks the weight of man's sin, and is in competition with the clear teaching of scripture.
*Note- I do not care of the reformed position on election.
There is a third view in which Christ's actual deaths, yes His dearhs on the cross shows eternal torment to be the end result for the lost.I have not seen any threads on this and wondered if anybody has given these positions much discussion or consideration. Some discussion might help us see why we believe what we do, especially relative to the poll on God's love for those in Hell.
The question can be posed like this one excerpted from a book by Samuele Bacchiocchi, Ph. D., Andrews University.........
The fundamental question is: Do impenitent sinners suffer conscious punishment in body and soul for all eternity, or are they annihilated by God in the second death after suffering a temporary punishment? To put it differently: Does hellfire torment the lost eternally or consume them permanently?
.
Nowhere in the Bible does it say the wicked suffer an eternal conscience torment.
Yes, that's a strange position for a Baptist to take, since the "traditional view" of baptism was infant baptism at the start of the Baptist movement during the Radical Reformation. Baptists assert that clear scriptural instruction trumps tradition every time.Al mohlar versus Chris date. DATE IS REFORMED but molars best argument is that ECT is the traditional view.
Unbelievable? Should Christians rethink Hell? Dr Al Mohler & Chris Date debate the traditional & conditionalist view: Saturday 03 January 2015 2:30... - Premier Christian Radio
Yes, that's the prophetic language of eternal destruction derived from the Isaiah 34 reference of the destruction of Edom:Then another angel, a third one, followed them, saying with a loud voice, “If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives a mark on his forehead or on his hand, he also will drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is mixed in full strength in the cup of His anger; and he will be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment ascends forever and ever; they have no rest day and night, those who worship the beast and his image, and whoever receives the mark of his name” [Revelation 14:9-11].