another baker

[Zaac]

While what the person wanted on the cake, according to him, has not changed, what the baker SAYS he wanted on the cake keeps changing.

Now she says what she refused to put on the cake was simply the scripture reference from Leviticus concerning gay sex. She says she is a Christian and believes that verse is offensive.

For those who don't remember, the Christian baker out on the west coast knew the gay couple, told them she could bake, decorate, deliver, and set up the cake but could not in good conscience provide a gay depicting cake topper.

For that she has lost her business, been ordered to pay huge punitive damages, and been castigated as a bigot.

I'm not seeing the difference in these two cases. In both, the baker refused to provide the decoration but in both offered a way to provide the cake and let the person buying finish the decorations.

The one in Denver is all over the news as a hero, the one out west as a homophobe.

See that's just absurd. If she was gonna do all the other stuff, why did she scoff at putting a topper on it? if you can't do the entire cake, don't offer to do any of it.