Some here continually attempt to argue that no scripture refutes the Calvinist/Determinist position. These same people typically refuse to reason rationally and/or engage in ethical debate and resort to calling philosophical argumentation over the interpretation of scriptures, ‘carnal reasoning” while Ad nauseam falling back on the claim that, “Non-Calvinist do not offer scriptures, they can’t, they can’t even to begin to”.
Obviously, the opposition knows the ones doing this enjoy nothing more than going in circles with simpleminded scriptural food-fights and are avoiding using the science of logical reasoning (philosophy) which is designed to draw out the truth in a matter concerning premises, claims and issues. Hence: We know they are trying to support their arguments through “circular reasoning fallacy”. Since critical thinking skills involving logical reasoning has no value to them I suggest the least I could do for those who under the delusion that we can’t offer scriptures and wish to forego rational reasoning in debate is to give them an example of what they say doesn’t exist.
It is said, seeing is believing, a picture is worth is worth a thousand words, and in this case a demonstration of the scriptures they say don’t exist might have some value in providing a reference to those who seem to continually forget they exist. So let’s humor them:
Here is your chance to offer scriptures to the Calvinists/Determinists and edify them in the truth that they exist.
Feel free to donate a few scriptures to the Calvinists/Determinists, but please keep to the protocol:
1) Offer Scripture
2) Offer a BRIEF explanation of how these scriptures refute their..ah, shall I dare say…address their ”reasoning” that their determinist' system is Biblical and dealing with their claims that “no scripture exists” while trying to overlook any argument they give by adhering to their own rules that “No correction is welcome” .
3) Remember keep the “carnal philosophical reasoning” to a minimum, this is merely an opportunity for a simple old fashion, good ole boy, Biblical food fight to see whether or not it is true that any scriptural support exists which refutes the Determinist System.
4) Remember, abide by their rules: No “carnal philosophical reasoning” about the scriptures after they and a "brief" explanation are presented.
This is the "debate" they have been asking for:
Obviously, the opposition knows the ones doing this enjoy nothing more than going in circles with simpleminded scriptural food-fights and are avoiding using the science of logical reasoning (philosophy) which is designed to draw out the truth in a matter concerning premises, claims and issues. Hence: We know they are trying to support their arguments through “circular reasoning fallacy”. Since critical thinking skills involving logical reasoning has no value to them I suggest the least I could do for those who under the delusion that we can’t offer scriptures and wish to forego rational reasoning in debate is to give them an example of what they say doesn’t exist.
It is said, seeing is believing, a picture is worth is worth a thousand words, and in this case a demonstration of the scriptures they say don’t exist might have some value in providing a reference to those who seem to continually forget they exist. So let’s humor them:
Here is your chance to offer scriptures to the Calvinists/Determinists and edify them in the truth that they exist.
Feel free to donate a few scriptures to the Calvinists/Determinists, but please keep to the protocol:
1) Offer Scripture
2) Offer a BRIEF explanation of how these scriptures refute their..ah, shall I dare say…address their ”reasoning” that their determinist' system is Biblical and dealing with their claims that “no scripture exists” while trying to overlook any argument they give by adhering to their own rules that “No correction is welcome” .
3) Remember keep the “carnal philosophical reasoning” to a minimum, this is merely an opportunity for a simple old fashion, good ole boy, Biblical food fight to see whether or not it is true that any scriptural support exists which refutes the Determinist System.
4) Remember, abide by their rules: No “carnal philosophical reasoning” about the scriptures after they and a "brief" explanation are presented.
This is the "debate" they have been asking for:
Last edited by a moderator: