Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Ridiculous. Can you use some more derogatory terminology? Nothing he said had any carnality to it, no matter what size font you've used in response. As far as how you've acted above, well carnality there is glaring.
You've been answered concisely, proven incorrect by jhb28 and iconoclast. They exegeted and you eisegeted. Same stuff different day.
:thumbs: :wavey:
STOP! OFF TOPIC!!!
There is NO "carnal philosophical reasoning" included in this tread as per your RULES! "No Correction is welcomed!"This tread is merely to demonstrate that we use scripture to support our Anti-Calvinism position! There is no resorting to "carnal philosophical reasoning".
I see how this is going before you hopefully reply. Please forget my comment. I cannot play by rules of using single verses to promote doctrine. And I don't do that either so I'm not your target. See ya
I did use scripture...but seeing as you added to God's word ..that was a foul and had to be called out. The scriptural arguement is intact.
So God says seek, and persons do that (which is bogus) and when they find Him they get the free gift of eternal life!!!!!! YAY!!!!
That's a works based salvation. That he (bennie) cannot see that in quoting Deut. is beyond me, he's missed the entire point. Man cannot and is dependent upon grace/mercy Romans 9:16, John 1:13.
Bennies interpretation is semi-pelagianism if not full. Makes salvation a reward, not a gift. Clearly bennie doesn't understand the implications of God's call, and that it is all through Christ, John 14:6. Only.
Thus we see the carnal philosophical reasoning of bennie inserted into passages of Scripture, with more to come.
STOP! Your comment is off topic.
This is simply a tread for those who wish to offer Anti-Calvinism scriptures to show they exists WITHOUT "carnal philosophical reasoning"!!!
Please take all attempts to begin personal attacks and to use your "carnal philosophical reasoning" to refute the clear teaching of scripture and begin your own tread.
There are rules here (not mine, but as requested) to be followed!
REPEAT:
The sole purpose of this tread is supply that scripture...
STOP
2 questions.
1. Why do you keep saying "tread" instead of thread? Is it a joke? I know I'm not as "intellectual" as you, so maybe I'm just too dumb to get it. Or maybe you just have spelling issues.
2. Are you trying to get yourself banned?
Off Topic!
Personal attacks are against the rules. Please do not troll this "tread" ...if you have any scripture to offer to the cause, do so, if not your off topic personal attacks are NOT welcome.
STOP! YOU ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE REQUESTED CALVINIST PRINCIPLES OF DEBATE!
This tread is to demonstrate that Non-Calvinist do indeed use scripture to refute the Determinist system and is to comply with the demands of the Calvinist/Determinist for a scriptural food-fight with WITHOUT getting into philosophical debate which would require ethical rules of argument (i.e. “carnal philosophical reasoning”).
The topic is simple, offer Anti-Calvinism scripture to show it does indeed exists while maintaining the premise in the OP. Please stay on topic which only requires presenting such non-existent scripture and a “brief” explanation of why the scripture is use.
If anyone wants to start a “carnal philosophical argument” involving in-depth reasoning about a particular scriptural interpretation then: START YOUR TREAD ON THAT SUBJECT.
Off Topic!
Personal attacks are against the rules. Please do not troll this "tread" ...if you have any scripture to offer to the cause, do so, if not your off topic personal attacks are NOT welcome.
The entire premise of the "free will" doctrine must be philosophical since it is clearly not Biblical!
You have confused yourself! You want folks to post Anti-Calvinism scripture scripture to show it does indeed exists yet then foolishly call it non-existent!!!!!! (it is not me saying it is Non-existent but is to present otherwise concerning the typical argument of the Calvinist/Determinist that they do NOT exist. ) This thread is to show they exist! Duh!
Philosophical arguments, especially about non-existent Scripture, are inherently carnal!
Acts 17:26-27(spoken to pagans)
proves ALL men were place precisely in the exact and perfect location geographicly and linearly to seek Him and "perhaps" reach out for Him (literally grope around as if in the dark) although He is not far frrom ANY one of us.
Refutes the T, U, L, and I.
How was that Benjamin?
How does that refute it? Who placed them there?Acts 17:26-27(spoken to pagans)
proves ALL men were place precisely in the exact and perfect location geographicly and linearly to seek Him and "perhaps" reach out for Him (literally grope around as if in the dark) although He is not far frrom ANY one of us.
Refutes the T, U, L, and I.
How was that Benjamin?