• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Anti-intellectualism Is Killing America

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I would think it is more the decline of Western Civilisation , America is not the only nation that has gone all spineless in kowtowing to all and sundry.

Which side of the evolution question are you on--pro or con? I am amazed that Crabtown thinks that his belief in evolution is a mark of intellection and my opposition to evolution as poor science is considered by Crabtown to be anti-egghead.
 

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I would think it is more the decline of Western Civilisation , America is not the only nation that has gone all spineless in kowtowing to all and sundry.

Good thoughts. We have all declined, gradually, but like a snowball, picking up.speed. I is just sad to watch something you dearly love, die.
 

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It seems that if you agree with Crabtown, you are an intellectual just like Crabtown says that he is.

Anyone can claim something, but being that something is another story! CTB could claim to be a Big Mac because he was in a McDonald's for a Filet of Fish sandwich, but that doesn't make it so! :laugh: :smilewinkgrin: :type:
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Anyone can claim something, but being that something is another story! CTB could claim to be a Big Mac because he was in a McDonald's for a Filet of Fish sandwich, but that doesn't make it so! :laugh: :smilewinkgrin: :type:


:thumbs:

No, Crabtown is not a Big Mac and if he stood in the garage all day he wouldn't be an automobile either. Nevertheless, Crabtown believes in evolution and he says that his belief in evolution makes him an intellectual (and he implies that it makes me a monkey). C'est la vie. The next step in evolution is to kill all the people who are not intellectuals in order to improve America and to stop people who are not intellectuals from killing America. Hitler believed in evolution and he found that he had to kill a lot of people to stop them from killing Germany.

Intellectuals are a higher form of evolution.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
:thumbs:

No, Crabtown is not a Big Mac and if he stood in the garage all day he wouldn't be an automobile either. Nevertheless, Crabtown believes in evolution and he says that his belief in evolution makes him an intellectual (and he implies that it makes me a monkey). C'est la vie. The next step in evolution is to kill all the people who are not intellectuals in order to improve America and to stop people who are not intellectuals from killing America. Hitler believed in evolution and he found that he had to kill a lot of people to stop them from killing Germany.

Intellectuals are a higher form of evolution.

Hitler believed in evolution as well and used to to justify her rampage. Margaret Sanger also did and she used it to justify her views. I wonder how intellectual they were?
 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Hitler believed in evolution as well and used to to justify her rampage. Margaret Sanger also did and she used it to justify her views. I wonder how intellectual they were?

Hitler believing or not believing in evolution has nothing to do with the validity or the invalidity of the theory. Using an argument from adverse consequences is a logical fallacy.

There is no doubt Hitler believed in eugenics, but that is a very different topic from evolution. Hitler also believed in the germ theory of diseases and considered the elimination of various minorities as getting rid of national germs. Of course this is the same logical fallacy.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Hitler believing or not believing in evolution has nothing to do with the validity or the invalidity of the theory. Using an argument from adverse consequences is a logical fallacy.

There is no doubt Hitler believed in eugenics, but that is a very different topic from evolution.

Ok you skipped over what I said. I said he as well as Margret Sanger used evolution as a justification for Eugenics. The point in bringing that up is it leads one to wonder, in the context of this thread, just how intellectual that is considered by far left progressives. Evolution being the basis for such stupid thinking. What my comment was not was a commentary on the validity of evolution.
 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Ok you skipped over what I said. I said he as well as Margret Sanger used evolution as a justification for Eugenics. The point in bringing that up is it leads one to wonder, in the context of this thread, just how intellectual that is considered by far left progressives. Evolution being the basis for such stupid thinking. What my comment was not was a commentary on the validity of evolution.

What is the stupid thinking you are referencing? Certainly is it not eugenics.
 

just-want-peace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The real problem is not anti-intellectualism; the REAL problem is the current fad of liberal PSEUDO-INTELLECTUALISM!
I believe it was Reagan who said, "It's not that liberals are stupid, it's just that they know so much that isn't true!" - or words to that effect.
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It is actually the self appointed "intellectual elite" that are ruining the country by ignoring the precepts and laws on which this country is based.

http://eyler.freeservers.com/JeffPers/jefpco38.htm


...in no case was confidence to be placed in even this aristocracy of virtue and talent so as to give them unlimited powers to run the government as they pleased. No elitist group was to be trusted to that extent. The fundamental structure of government was controlled by a Constitution which bound this elite of virtue and talent to certain principles.

"It would be a dangerous delusion were a confidence in the men of our choice to silence our fears for the safety of our rights. Confidence is everywhere the parent of despotism. Free government is founded in jealousy, and not in confidence. It is jealousy and not confidence which prescribes limited constitutions, to bind down those whom we are obliged to trust with power. Our Constitution has accordingly fixed the limits to which, and no further, our confidence may go... In questions of power, then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution." --Thomas Jefferson: Draft, Kentucky Res., 1798.

This was to be a government of the people, not an aristocracy of the elite. Governmental purpose rested on the inalienable rights of the people, not on a confidence in the experts who run the government. Because certain talented persons are needed to operate the government does not mean that those persons will somehow be free of interest.

"All know the influence of interest on the mind of man, and how unconsciously his judgment is warped by that influence." --Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821.

No person is to be trusted with the powers of government independently of the oversight by the people.
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Hitler believing or not believing in evolution has nothing to do with the validity or the invalidity of the theory. Using an argument from adverse consequences is a logical fallacy.

There is no doubt Hitler believed in eugenics, but that is a very different topic from evolution. Hitler also believed in the germ theory of diseases and considered the elimination of various minorities as getting rid of national germs. Of course this is the same logical fallacy.

Crabtown, as an intellectual you must realize that anti-intellectualism is killing America and the only way to save America is for the intellectuals to kill the anti-intellectuals. Afterall, evolution is about the survival of the fittest and, clearly, intellectuals are more fit than anti-intellectuals who are so ignorant that they don't believe in scientific Darwinism. Hitler believed that Aryans were a higher form of evolution but evolution has now proven than intellectuals who believe in evolution are now the highest form of evolution.

How much clearer could it be than that?
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The author of the drivel posted in the OP.

David Niose's background includes experience in law and mass communication. Having practiced law in Massachusetts since 1990, Niose has also worked in print and broadcast media, taught both history and law, and written extensively on a wide array of issues. Upon joining the AHA board in 2005, Niose initiated and helped develop the AHA's media campaign.

Niose has appeared in national media and spoken to groups around the country, emphasizing the importance of utilizing mass media to inject humanist ideas into the public dialogue, improve the public image of humanists, and sway public opinion away from the religious right.

As an attorney, Niose has advocated for church/state separation and the rights of humanists and other nontheists, and he is currently involved in implementing a legal strategy to enforce the rights of humanists and other nontheists via the avenue of equal protection law. He has worked with the Secular Coalition for America in various positions to help advocate for the rights of Secular Americans, and has served on the boards of Greater Worcester Humanists and Greater Boston Humanists.

Says all that needs to be said about the self styled intellectual "humanist". Consider the source.
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Make that self styled pseudo intellectual and I'll be aboard. :thumbs:

No, Crabtown is a true intellectual because he believes in evolution. It is those who are against Darwinism who are killing America and those people will have to be killed to save America--that is what Darwin teaches. Only the intellectuals who believe in Darwin can save America.

It is what may be meant by political science, but then I am on the list because I don't believe in evolution. Now I do believe in climate change because it was very hot today and it wasn't hot 90 days ago.
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No, Crabtown is a true intellectual because he believes in evolution. It is those who are against Darwinism who are killing America and those people will have to be killed to save America--that is what Darwin teaches. Only the intellectuals who believe in Darwin can save America.

It is what may be meant by political science, but then I am on the list because I don't believe in evolution. Now I do believe in climate change because it was very hot today and it wasn't hot 90 days ago.

Christians are always considered anti-intellectual by the pseudo intellectual elite.
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Christians are always considered anti-intellectual by the pseudo intellectual elite.

Ah, you have made a very good point, Carpro, and I have to applaud you for that. For example, Marx said that we were a bunch of drug addicts on an opiate, and even the new Pope is a Red Pope and a Marxist, sadly.

The late Dave Breese wrote a book about seven men who rule from the grave and Darwin was one of them. The complete list is Charles Darwin, Julius Wellhausen, John Dewey, Sigmund Freud, John Maynard Keynes, Soren Kierkegaard and Karl Marx. I guess that those are the mentors of American intellectuals, and if I disagree with any or all of those seven I probably will be charged with a hate crime and executed by the intellectuals who prefer power above all else, no?
 

OnlyaSinner

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The real problem is not anti-intellectualism; the REAL problem is the current fad of liberal PSEUDO-INTELLECTUALISM!
I believe it was Reagan who said, "It's not that liberals are stupid, it's just that they know so much that isn't true!" - or words to that effect.

Resembles a quote from Civil War era journalist/humorist P.T. Nasby: "It ain't so much people bein' ignorant; it's them knowin' things that ain't so."
 
Top