• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Any "false" doctrines found in John 14:2,3?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Salamander

New Member
http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=1295376&postcount=21

I was accused of making a false doctrine, by none-the-less than Brother Ed, but I fail to see where he makes this claim as to have it validated in the link above.

I am not trying to re-open the previous "discussion" which turned out as just another attack your brethren according to your bias.

Since the claim was made I have to ask what false doctrine I am supposedly pushing and what OTHER false doctrines culminate from John 14:2,3?
 

Salamander

New Member
Yep, after 29 views I see no one but the instigator of falsehoods has anything to offer that anyone has ever come up with anything considered a false doctrine on these verses.

The usual diatribe by another member to cause suspicion upon this brother in Christ is becoming sickening.:godisgood:
 

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
From my reading, you said:

"Seems the NKJV has altered doctrine here. ..."

then Ed Edwards responded with:

"Nobody I know of is teaching your false doctrine from the nKJV about John 14:2-3"

I think the "false doctrine" is not referring to anything in the KJV or nKJV but your term "altered doctrine" which, if is a doctrine from Scripture that is altered, it is then a false doctrine. In other words, your "altered doctrine" is not evident to Ed Edwards.
 

Ed Edwards

<img src=/Ed.gif>
Ed Edwards: // "Nobody I know of is teaching your false doctrine from the nKJV about John 14:2-3" //

Duh! 'Nobody I know' includes Salamander who I know through the Baptist Board. So I thought it was obvious that the 'false doctrine' I identified with your (referant: Salamander) was the 'false doctrine' that Salamander does NOT teach from the nKJV but the 'false doctrine' that Salamander IDENTIFIED.

Nevertheless, I guess on could say it less confusing:

Nobody I know of is teaching 'the false doctrine from the nKJV' which Brother Salamander identified. Therefore it is useless discussing the matter any more. Brother Sal has slain the nasty windmill which hath been terrorizing the Baptist Board (BB) neighborhood.

The nKJV is part of ALL SCRIPTURE.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

rbell

Active Member
annsni said:
From my reading, you said:

"Seems the NKJV has altered doctrine here. ..."

then Ed Edwards responded with:

"Nobody I know of is teaching your false doctrine from the nKJV about John 14:2-3"

I think the "false doctrine" is not referring to anything in the KJV or nKJV but your term "altered doctrine" which, if is a doctrine from Scripture that is altered, it is then a false doctrine. In other words, your "altered doctrine" is not evident to Ed Edwards.


I agree with the above.

And I would guess that the reason you didn't see a flurry of replies is because of how contentious some of the discussions you're involved in become.
 

blackbird

Active Member
I find nothing here to debate------this is a debate forum--not a quarrel forum---please settle personal issues via PM with the one in question

This thread is closed---if the OP wishes he may take the issue up with an administrator

Sincerely,
Bro. David
aka blackbird
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top