• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Any opposition to Odrama labeled as "Extremism"

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Then what does a poster with exaggerated lips and ears have to do with abortion and intrusion? What did the sign that said he should be hanged have to do with abortion and intrusion?

yea you tell me.I have no idea why you brought it up in the first place. It has nothing to do with the DHS report.




It only takes one and I believe it's called Habeas corpus.

Name the people effected by a loss of rights.


I
didn't say needlessly you added that word. And, if we kick in a door and find no insurgents, was there a need to kick in that door? I have no problem admitting what we did and fully support our troops for doing it. It was war and things happen in war for various reasons. Innocent people die in war which can never be described as "right" but is a truth we have to accept.

Sigh....what?



According to Webster... Unwillingness to recognize and respect differences in opinions or beliefs

How about intolerant of dissent unless the dems are doing it.



I think it succeeded in taking the news, spot light and focus off the tea parties... I think you guys met your match with Obama. He got you again.

There has been no evidence of this cited or proven. And in fact it has worked to incite conservatives. Not smart at all. But like I told ken you guys just keep thinking other wise. Such illegal activity will bite him in the back side.
 

LeBuick

New Member
There has been no evidence of this cited or proven. And in fact it has worked to incite conservatives. Not smart at all. But like I told ken you guys just keep thinking other wise. Such illegal activity will bite him in the back side.

I believe that's the problem, it incited the far right but it doesn't bring your moderates back whose numbers you need to win an election. Th tea parties that are now overshadowed might have brought some of your moderates back.

I could be wrong, but I think he just chased more of your moderates further away by stirring up the anger attacks from far right and giving them a label the moderates don't want to be associated with. The more outraged the far right gets the more your moderates leave the fold. They are not nearly as conservative as the far right.

So yes your are right, he made the far right a tighter base. But what you don't seem to get is there are not enough votes in the far right alone to win an election.
 

poncho

Well-Known Member
So it's all Obama's doing is it? :laugh:

You guys are wacked. I told you all this stuff was happening way way way before Obama's name ever come up on Baptist Board. This isn't Obama's doing at all. When are you going to learn these political figures are puppets?
 

Alcott

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
When you make a picture of Obama with exaggerated lips and ears, you don't find that to be racist?

No. When Nixon was drawn with an exaggeratedly large nose and his receding hairline exaggerated, was that racist? Political cartoons that exaggerate features and make caricatures have been around since Thomas Nast or before.
 

rbell

Active Member
No. When Nixon was drawn with an exaggeratedly large nose and his receding hairline exaggerated, was that racist? Political cartoons that exaggerate features and make caricatures have been around since Thomas Nast or before.

You don't seem to understand.

Any criticism, caricature, etc., of Obama is by definition, racist.

Nixon was an old white guy. He was fair game.
 

Alcott

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You don't seem to understand.

Any criticism, caricature, etc., of Obama is by definition, racist.

Nixon was an old white guy. He was fair game.

Those are the points I was making, so I do understand.
 

poncho

Well-Known Member
Hey Rev,

Who was president on January twenty three 2007 at 1:32:54 PM?

The reason I ask is because that is the day and the hour that this PDF file was created.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

poncho

Well-Known Member
Created i/23/2007, BUT modified April 7, 2009!!! What was in the original document?:tear:

Dunno maybe it pointed out that another report entitled "Leftwing Extremists Likely To Increase Use Of Cyber Attacks Over The Coming Decade" was created the same day?

There's been quite a slew of these types of "reports" that have been coming out for a long while now. Face it the state thinks we're all threats or would be threats to it's safety no matter which side of the fence you happen to be standing on. Aren't you all glad the state has a shiney new militarized police force to protect itself against all us citizens, er uh, threats?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

poncho

Well-Known Member
You hush now... Don't tell the party of victims that others received similar reports. We know their report is a badge for not agreeing with Obama.

Don't know about all that but it seems kind of crazy to me to be blaming the Obama administration for something that was created under the Bush administration. I still wonder what's in it for Obama though. He could just come out and say hey look at the date, this isn't my doing. There must be some benefit in it for him.

This has nothing to do with the right vs the left like everyone is making it out to be. This is about we the people vs the corporate fascist state, period.

Would anyone like to discuss this (how the state uses these reports to keep us divided and at each others necks or in other words distracted from the real issue at hand) further or would you just prefer to keep playing their game and fueling the flames of division amongst ourselves?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You hush now... Don't tell the party of victims that others received similar reports. We know their report is a badge for not agreeing with Obama.


It is not a similar report at all. Just because it uses the title "left wing extremists" does not make it similar.
 

poncho

Well-Known Member
It is not a similar report at all. Just because it uses the title "left wing extremists" does not make it similar.

Both of these reports, and this is just two of many like it are similar because they all do the same thing. Point out that the criminal state fears it's citizens and what they might do if ever they come to understand that those on the right and on the left are being manipulated and played against each other to keep us all distracted and divided. While we're being sheared and readied to be "merged" and "harmonized" into the new international order the Bushes, Clinton's, and Obama's are so fond of.

Same old plays from the same old playbook.
 

rbell

Active Member
I think you guys met your match with Obama. He got you again.

Oh well...I guess when you think of He Who Can Do Nothing Wrong...yeah; we're pretty much gonna lose every time...you can't win when a deity is the opponent.
 

tinytim

<img src =/tim2.jpg>
It is sad to see people falling all over themselves worshipping this false god we have as President.

Sickening isn't it?

Jesus or Obama... you can't worship both

Jesus is Prolife
Obama is Prodeath...

Obama Spends
Jesus Saves

Choose Obama, you have turned your back on God.

You can't serve 2 masters.

I serve God, and stand opposed to Obama's policies of death, and pro homosexuality.

OH well.. it will all wash out in the end.
Those of us who will stand for God against the little god of this world, will continue to stand when Obama worshippers are perishing in the lake of fire.

(Don't misconstrue this post to say that anyone here is worshipping Obama.. I am talking about the Obama worshippers in real life)
 

LeBuick

New Member
Don't know about all that but it seems kind of crazy to me to be blaming the Obama administration for something that was created under the Bush administration. I still wonder what's in it for Obama though. He could just come out and say hey look at the date, this isn't my doing. There must be some benefit in it for him.

I stated my theory, it seems as no coincidence that this report was released the day of the tea parties. Perhaps he'll let it go a few days until the smoke is clear and the right demands his head then reveal how this was not his administrations findings.
 

LeBuick

New Member
Choose Obama, you have turned your back on God.

I'm not sure God would want his Name used in this way. We all know there is no correlation between God and political affiliations. God is neither Democrat or Republican since both parties have faults and come short of the Glory of God.
 
Top