God was and is pleased by having the Cross and person of Christ exalted!can you define the word PLEASED?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
God was and is pleased by having the Cross and person of Christ exalted!can you define the word PLEASED?
Its not either/or, and I do agree Bible alone is the inspired authority, we can use them as sources / much that we use other books!
God was and is pleased by having the Cross and person of Christ exalted!
Yes, His death was sufficient to save all lost sinners, but effectual only towards those whom Good intended to get saved by it!the death of Jesus Christ is universal, and those who "repent and believe" will be saved. No "limit" on this anywhere in the Bible, only in "reformed theology"!
Yes, His death was sufficient to save all lost sinners, but effectual only towards those whom Good intended to get saved by it!
We agree, as being baptists we have the right to use or reject them for ourselves, but cannot decide for others are to view this!it is a personal choice. Not for myself
We agree, as being baptists we have the right to use or reject them for ourselves, but cannot decide for others are to view this!
I take it that you mean you have not used a confession adopted by a church, association, something like that. Is that correct? In this thread alone you have made at least the following confessions of faith:I have been a born again Christian since Feb 1982, and in all these years have not used any creed or confession for any of my theology! I read the Bible...
As I understand it, and the originator of the thread may correct me if I am wrong, the subject of the OP is about whether or not having a confession of faith is a valid principle, not whether any particular confession of faith is scriptural.different subject, lets stick with the OP
You do not really understand what they are teaching, and I do have issues myself with certain areas on the WCF!the two "confessions" that I have quoted, show how DANGEROUS these can be! They are actually teaching what the Bible does NOT!
I take it that you mean you have not used a confession adopted by a church, association, something like that. Is that correct? In this thread alone you have made at least the following confessions of faith:
As I understand it, and the originator of the thread may correct me if I am wrong, the subject of the OP is about whether or not having a confession of faith is a valid principle, not whether any particular confession of faith is scriptural.
- the Bible which Teaches that The Three Persons are equally YHWH
- The Holy Bible, in its 66 Books, in the Original Autographs, IS ALONE THE Infallible, Inerrant, God-breathed, Word of Almighty God
- I do NOT believe in universal salvation
- the death of Jesus Christ is universal, and those who "repent and believe" will be saved
stop trying to defend a faulty, man-made, unbiblical "confession", just because it is "reformed"!
How is it lazy to thoughtfully write out the beliefs and doctrines which they/church believe and hold to? Everyone has a confession of faith which they hold, including you, even if you won't admit it.for lazy Christians!
You do not really understand what they are teaching
there are plenty of confessions that are not reformed. Reformed has nothing to do with statements of Faith.
How is it lazy to thoughtfully write out the beliefs and doctrines which they/church believe and hold to? Everyone has a confession of faith which they hold, including you, even if you won't admit it.
Correct.As I understand it, and the originator of the thread may correct me if I am wrong, the subject of the OP is about whether or not having a confession of faith is a valid principle, not whether any particular confession of faith is scriptural.
not whether any particular confession of faith is scriptural
Statement of belief would be just someone confessing what they see the Bible affirming and teaching!I have given what I personally believe from what I see the Bible teaches. It is not a "confession", but statements of facts, as I see them. "Confessions" are documents that reflect the teachings of a denomination, faith group or Church/Bible school...
They are NOT anti scriptural!then WHY have one as Christians, if they are not Scriptural? It makes no sense at all
Confessions do not have to be by a denomination, school, etc. A confession can be personal -- what you believe. One definition of confess is to declare one's religious faith or belief, or as you say, "I have given what I personally believe."I have given what I personally believe from what I see the Bible teaches. It is not a "confession", but statements of facts, as I see them. "Confessions" are documents that reflect the teachings of a denomination, faith group or Church/Bible school...
If you don't get it, I am not sure I can explain it to you. Obviously, the people who make the confessions think they are biblical. Yet, for example, Calvinists think Arminian confessions are unscriptural, while Arminians think they are scriptural. Arminians think Calvinist confessions are unscriptural, while Calvinists think they are scriptural. The question is, is it wrong for people or groups to confess what they believe from what the Bible teaches?then WHY have one as Christians, if they are not Scriptural? It makes no sense at all
They are NOT anti scriptural!