• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Are Iran leaders Jewish?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rob_BW

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
tenor.gif
 

Squire Robertsson

Administrator
Administrator
Please give me a reason why I should not view this in the same as being in the same genre as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Anti-Semitic tripe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rsr

RighteousnessTemperance&

Well-Known Member
Could you pick any part of the article you disagree with and oppose it with facts?
Are there compelling reasons not to apply the author's own technique of associating names to link him, Donny Ahzmond, with the famous LDS Osmond family with ulterior motives to stir up controversy against Jews?
 

Agent47

Active Member
Site Supporter
Please give me a reason why I should not view this in the same as being in the same genre as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Anti-Semitic tripe.

You have not given any basis for your objection so your views are ignored with contempt. Please demonstrate any falsehood in the article.

Protocols was exposed as a forgery I think in 1921 before either of us were born. They did not just 'view' it as fake, they went out of their way using science and history to do that.
 
Last edited:

Agent47

Active Member
Site Supporter
Why would you think this is an important topic?
Iran is making news lately and is there an inconvenient time for history lessons?

I'm waiting for a well reasoned objection to the contents. The views there are not mine. I tried to find anything against what he said and I couldn't. Can you?
 

Agent47

Active Member
Site Supporter
Are there compelling reasons not to apply the author's own technique of associating names to link him, Donny Ahzmond, with the famous LDS Osmond family with ulterior motives to stir up controversy against Jews?

There is more than names in this piece.

Please, all I need is sound refuting of his points.
 

RighteousnessTemperance&

Well-Known Member
There is more than names in this piece.

Please, all I need is sound refuting of his points.
No, it's all about names, which is how genealogies generally work, and a lot of speculation.

OK, it also mentions noses and hair in a conspiratorial way, as though the Jews are completely unrelated to other peoples in the region, which would contradict the Bible. Abraham had many sons, and was related to others besides, as was hairy, red Esau.

And for some reason it seems to treat the name Ismail, a variant of Ishmael, as a supposedly Jewish rather than Arab/Muslim reference.

As for the supposed photographic forensics, nothing appears established there at all.

Bottom line, it doesn't sound sound enough to need refuting. It's poor speculation, or rich in speculation. But keep trying—maybe Muhammad was Jewish. After all, he was a businessman. Or possibly his cousin Ali ibn Abi Talib would fit the bill.
 

Agent47

Active Member
Site Supporter
No, it's all about names, which is how genealogies generally work, and a lot of speculation.

OK, it also mentions noses and hair in a conspiratorial way, as though the Jews are completely unrelated to other peoples in the region, which would contradict the Bible. Abraham had many sons, and was related to others besides, as was hairy, red Esau.

And for some reason it seems to treat the name Ismail, a variant of Ishmael, as a supposedly Jewish rather than Arab/Muslim reference.

As for the supposed photographic forensics, nothing appears established there at all.

Bottom line, it doesn't sound sound enough to need refuting. It's poor speculation, or rich in speculation. But keep trying—maybe Muhammad was Jewish. After all, he was a businessman. Or possibly his cousin Ali ibn Abi Talib would fit the bill.

You have not read it. Don't bother refuting what you have yet to read
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You have not given any basis for your objection so your views are ignored with contempt.

Who gives a rats behind what you have contempt for. Your anti-semitism is on full display. You are a propagandist. The hubris in which you constantly display shows your heart. You are a joke. Be gone.
 

rsr

<b> 7,000 posts club</b>
Moderator
Iran is making news lately and is there an inconvenient time for history lessons?

I'm waiting for a well reasoned objection to the contents. The views there are not mine. I tried to find anything against what he said and I couldn't. Can you?

Why would I want to? Again, what is the purpose of this screed?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top