Are most Fundamental Baptists Churches KJVO then?

[Ben1445]

Its the verse about craftsmen...

I am aware of the Jer. 34.16 discrepancy in the Oxford edition which Oxford recognized as it's error and has even now changed most of its printings to be accurate (I am told. I didn't Check this myself).

I am not finding a discrepancy in this one in Revelation right off. if you don't mind pointing it out when you get a chance, I would appreciate it.

 

[KJB1611reader]

I am aware of the Jer. 34.16 discrepancy in the Oxford edition which Oxford recognized as it's error and has even now changed most of its printings to be accurate (I am told. I didn't Check this myself).

I am not finding a discrepancy in this one in Revelation right off. if you don't mind pointing it out when you get a chance, I would appreciate it.

That's different.

Go read Revelation side by side the 1611 KJB.

 

[Ben1445]

I read Chapter 18 and didn't see it.

 

[KJB1611reader]

I read Chapter 18 and didn't see it.

Okay, I shall find it to morrow and send a photo.

Shawn

 

[Dr. Bob]

It's my understanding that the original KJV translators included the extra books not considering them a part of the 66 books, but significant in history.

The original AV1611 listed a daily Bible Reading as well as cross-references to other Bible verses. In BOTH, the translators included passages from the apocryphal books with old and new testament books as "Bible" readings/references. Remember, these were "Anglican", just one generation from Roman Catholicism, so were still in theology and practice tied closely to the papists.

 

[KJB1611reader]

Yes Dr. Bob.

Though it wasnots scripture, just historical books thst may contain some good wisdom.

Also, Holy Bible contained Old and New Test.

Also, to the others whom it may concern regard craftsman in Rev 18:22 in 1769.