It isn't.
Dad2, how old are you?
I ask because I am only in my mid 50's and I can remember the PLO and the rise of Hamas. But all of the history (including fairly recent history) seems foreign to you. The land once belonged to Israel. Prime Minister Meir was a Ukrainian immigrant to Palestine. Palestine belonged to the Ottoman Empire until the end of WW1, and then was controlled by England.
Palestine has had the opportunity to be its own country (a two-state solution) since 1947. Israel supported this, however the Arabs rejected the plan (they did not want an all Palestine state).
The fact is Israel is responding to a mass murder committed by Palestinians under the government of Hamas with the support of Iran and Lebanon.
No. They are ruining Gaza and mass murdering the people. If they ever happened to get a hamas in the death toll by accident, that is no excuse for the terrorism they inflict on a population.
Their goal for decades has been to exist in peace.
Then perhaps they should not have forced over 700,000 people out and stole their lands, and put up barbed wire around a population, restricting their lives, travel, etc. in virtual prison camps. That is begging for war not some goal for peace.
The initial goal of Hamas was create a Palestinian state along side Israel, however their current goal is the PLO goal - exterminate the Jews.
Who cares what the goal of terrorists is? They are not the issue. The mass murder of civilians and inhuman treatment of a population is the issue. No excuses possible
Israel actually won the right to the Gaza Strip, the Golan Heights, the West Bank, and the entire Sanai Peninsula. They won this when they defeated Egypt, Jordan, and Seria in 1967.
So the oppressed were not able to take it back, so that means Israel has 'rights'?
They withdrew for peace. Israel withdrew from the Gaza Strip in 2005.
Not from control. No airport, sea port, freedom of travel, etc etc. It looks like they took out their soldiers so they would not be killed for their own benefit, rather than some magnanimous gesture.
The problem is Israel's enemies will not stop until Israel ceases to exist. This is what "to the river and the sea" means.
That depends on who is using the term. When Israel uses it, it means something else. The issue is not what women and children are supposedly thinking or believing when they get blown to hell in the street or their homes. The issue is the wanton destruction terrorism and mass murders being committed against a population (rather than criminals)
I do understand why we, as Christians, give over lives lost on both sides. I do not understand why you side with the terrorists - the ones who actually committed mass murder.
Children and civilians are not terrorists. They are the oppressed. The innocent. I do not see how you can equate the ruination of a country and deprivation of basic needs, and non stop bombing and literal mass murder of people with 'siding with terrorists'. If you can go in and kill those who actually are terrorists, do it. Do not bomblast the civilians. God no likey