Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I made the first mistake of my life. (Lol). My software is by default Macarthur commentary. I had switched it to ESV study Bible and forgot. What I attributed to Mac, he did not say. It indeed came from ESV study Bible. Macarthur is still very little help.ESV Study Bible [Link]
2:15 This is a notoriously difficult-to-understand verse. Paul clearly does not believe people can be saved in the sense of earning justification through childbearing or any other means (e.g., Eph. 2:8–9). But the NT can also use the term “saved” (Gk. sōzō) in the sense of progressively coming to experience all the aspects of salvation. In that sense, “salvation” is ongoing (see note on Phil. 2:12–13). A similar view is that “saved” can be understood as referring especially to the endurance and perseverance in faith that is necessary for eternal salvation (cf. Matt. 10:22; 24:13; etc.). People are saved as they persevere (continue) in the faith to carry out the Lord’s calling in their life, one example being the unique role of women in childbearing. (The change from singular she to plural they is a literal rendering of the Gk. text.)
Crossway Bibles. 2008. The ESV Study Bible. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.
~~~~~~~~~
Still pondering... I'm not satisfied with the answer.
If this is the answer it would apply to both men and women! >>> Why point the saving/sanctification towards only women?
I'll move on in my studies and leave the interpretation of this passage open for further evaluation.
The inability to understand the context and meaning lend to move me closer to a problem that Paul was addressing that was contemporary to his time... and that we not longer have access to knowing.
Rob
If that were true, what of the single women praised by Paul in 1 Cor. 7:34?I'm studying through 1 Timothy and having some problems integrating 1 Timothy 2:15 with its context (2:8-15).
1 Timothy 2:15 (ESV 2016)
Yet she will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control.
Are women really saved through childbearing?
Rob
Written in German?... by someone I would not recommend.
Not according to MacArthur. He does not say much about this verse, but he does say "2:15 women. That Paul does not have Eve in mind here is clear because the verb translated “will be saved” is future, and he also uses the plural pronoun “they.” He is talking about women after Eve. will be saved.".The text " . . . Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, . . .". The context, verses 13-15, explicitly refers to Eve, not women. Think. And that bad interpretation would morally exclude all single women.
The she refers to Eve in the verses 13-15 context.Not according to MacArthur. He does not say much about this verse, but he does say "2:15 women. That Paul does not have Eve in mind here is clear because the verb translated “will be saved” is future, and he also uses the plural pronoun “they.” He is talking about women after Eve. will be saved.".
Yes but not unto salvation. The "saved" is referring to not being useless. The fact that she bears children gives her the opportunity rear a godly heritage. But what about women that have no children? I believe that they are under the umbrella of those women who do bear children.I'm studying through 1 Timothy and having some problems integrating 1 Timothy 2:15 with its context (2:8-15).
1 Timothy 2:15 (ESV 2016)
Yet she will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control.
Are women really saved through childbearing?
Rob