What do YOU think it means to be a slave of Christ?
OK, Luke, now
that is an excellent question.
You're absolutely correct in making the assumption underlying your position that there is nothing in the Bible declaring any of us, sinner or believer, free. We're not. Paul tells us we are either slaves -- or, as I've said before, "bond-servants" -- to sin, or to righteousness. Those in sin cannot free themselves. But once Christ "sets us free" we
willingly entrust our life and our faith to Him.
This is why I prefer the term "bond-servant" to the word "slave." Slavery has come to be synonymous with bondage, degradation and gross inequality. That is how human slaves have lived their lives for the last 400 or more years. I am firmly in the belief that is the reason the NASB shows preference for the term "bond-servant," in order to show the different paradigms represented by those words. There are those who disparage the NASB for that translation, but the NASB makes a deliberate choice in both the Old and New Testaments to alternately translate the word
doulos or its OT equivalent
'ebed as either "slave" or "bond-servant." It requires an understanding of the nuances of the passage in which the word is included to determine which is appropriate.
Why? Because the "slave" to sin has no choice. Into sin he/she is born, and in sin he/she will die unless hearing of the salvation of Christ and trusting in Him. Then, as we have, he/she will
willingly and unhesitatingly put him/herself in servitude to Christ. He is the only source of pure joy, peace, and love we will ever know in this life. It is true that servants receive a wage, and based on that, there might be some minor objection to its use for
doulos.
However, I don't believe that argument stands. In the first-century understanding of servitude, the bond-slave had nothing to offer but him/herself. Nothing could convince a householder to take a bond-servant under his roof. They were the poor of society, with no property, no dowry, nothing but their own bodies, and the inherent strength of weakness of those bodies to be put into service for the masters. That is all we have to offer Christ, and He doesn't need them. He takes us in out of His love, and because He loved us before we loved Him, He does so with great joy and affection. In Christ, there is no inequality, because we cannot even pretend to be equal with Him, and there is no degradation, because He doesn't degrade. He loves.
So, I am a bond-servant, not a slave. Partially because of the modern day understanding of that word do I reject it as indicative of the relationship between myself and Jesus, but also because I have willingly placed myself in His service, because of what He has done for me. No slave ever willingly gave up freedom. No sane person would. But a bond-servant, especially in the first century, took this servitude on willingly, as refuge against the world, and the storms of life. That is why I give me life to Christ daily, because I have no other refuge, no other recourse, and nowhere I could be shown the love that He shows me. Masters don't love slaves. Yet Christ loves those who belong to Him, and for that reason we give ourselves up to love and serve Him.