Featured Artifical Intelligence Translation?

Note JOJ does not address what I said, but addresses what he says was his understanding. Go figure.

Here is what I said:
People whose livelihood is teaching Greek, would not like to be made obsolete by an AI program that could take any Greek text and turn it into a reverse interlinear in English.
I addressed all those who derive their income dispensing their "special knowledge" which could be obtained through AI instead.
Here is the next thing I said:
Or consider software programmers, what is the need if AI could write programs at incredible speed with superior results? Just go down the list, and you will find that the "special knowledge" folks are all in jeopardy.
Does anyone see where I am addressing JOJ, or just Greek teachers or am I addressing everyone worried about technological displacement?

 

Yes, I know you seem to be the center of your world, but Sir, you are not the center of the translation world, as for example you did not write, not fully understand the essay you linked which said:

What’s next?
In addition to garnering funding from their university, Hermjakob and Mathew’s work has received support from a major Christian Bible translation agency. Their goal is to make the software available for free, in keeping with their Christian beliefs about the importance of spreading the word of God “to every tribe and nation.”​

How AI is helping to translate the Bible into rare languages

 

Totally off topic, personality centered posts
Did anyone say AI will replace missionaries, mentors, pastors, and the like? Nope.

 

Totally off topic, personality centered posts
Did anyone say AI will replace missionaries, mentors, pastors, and the like? Nope.

Here is what I said:
People whose livelihood is teaching Greek, would not like to be made obsolete by an AI program that could take any Greek text and turn it into a reverse interlinear in English.
I addressed all those who derive their income dispensing their "special knowledge" which could be obtained through AI instead.
Here is the next thing I said:
Or consider software programmers, what is the need if AI could write programs at incredible speed with superior results? Just go down the list, and you will find that the "special knowledge" folks are all in jeopardy.
Does anyone see where I am addressing JOJ, or just Greek teachers or am I addressing everyone worried about technological displacement?

 

Calculating probabilities is a data analysis performed mathematically. For example say a Greek word is usually translated as meaning one of three things. But an outlier translation goes with a meaning not consistent with any of the word's historical meanings. The probability that translation is best is low.

Yes, software is only as objective as its programing, and thus if Christians set the program's standards it might be very helpful. Of course, in the absence of the product to review, the viewpoint is conjectural.

I am just saying, do not throw the baby out with the bath water.

 

Sir, your post does not mesh with my understanding of reality. AI can replace many of the tasks currently performed by people.
Your claims concerning statistical analysis again differ from reality in my opinion. AI has potential that is unknown, and to claim it is known once again differs from reality.

 

In my opinion, your 5 points are all false.
1) The limits of AI are unknown.
2) AI is not dependent on selected input, given the ability to search a composite database beyond human comprehension.
3) Yes, the expertise of AI, its capacity to expand the knowledge of its users, is dependent upon its human programing.
4) Given that AI can write software, the claim new software will be dependent on human input is inaccurate.
5) What should be done in a perfect world is seldom done in reality.

 

Did anyone say AI is or will become self-aware, i.e. Number 5 is Alive? Nope

1) The limits of AI are unknown.
2) AI is not dependent on selected input, given the ability to search a composite database beyond human comprehension.
3) Yes, the expertise of AI, its capacity to expand the knowledge of its users, is dependent upon its human programing.
4) Given that AI can write software, the claim new software will be dependent on human input is inaccurate.
5) What should be done in a perfect world is seldom done in reality.

 

I said and stand by what I said, "the limits of AI are unknown." See post #57. I did not claim AI would become "self-aware." And I did not claim AI would remain unaware. OTOH, your claim # 1 is obviously false.

What does "inhuman" mean? Written by AI and not by human hands? Or lacking the compassion of the milk of human kindness?

What does "unknowing" mean? Not knowing everything or not knowing anything?

What does "unaware" mean? Not being self-aware or not being responsive to inquiry?