IAMWEAK_2007
Member
Why would GOD put the tree of knowledge in the garden of eden? And how does satan know about this tree?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Why would GOD put the tree of knowledge in the garden of eden? And how does satan know about this tree?
Why would GOD put the tree of knowledge in the garden of eden? And how does satan know about this tree?
Wrong question. God does things according to His own will. But ultimately, it was to teach the heirs of salvation something about themselves. That lesson is hotly debated between those who have learned it, and those who have yet to.Why would GOD put the tree of knowledge in the garden of eden? And how does satan know about this tree?
Why would GOD put the tree of knowledge in the garden of eden? And how does satan know about this tree?
Wrong question.
Category mistake....the question is not properly classified as either "right" or "wrong". Possibly....it might be pointless or un-answerable (although I don't think so)...but it isn't "wrong".
God does things according to His own will.
Of course he does...why are Calvinists constantly harping on this? Are they trying to convince themselves or us? I am getting to the point of thinking that it is they themselves they are trying to convince and not others... Everyone already knows this...it is as fundamental as Monotheism itself...It is as though Calvinists are constantly reminding us that there is "Only one God, and there are none like him".....O.K. got it, now tell us something we don't know. The question wasn't whether it was God's will to put the tree there...the question was more like: "Why did God "will/want" to put the tree in the garden in the first place?"
But ultimately, it was to teach the heirs of salvation something about themselves.
Not likely....according to Calvinistic thought...we can little compare ourselves to Adam in that he had something of a "genuine" freedom of choice (as a not pre-corrupted slave to sin already) and it is only through or after his choice that we who are "dead" in him, have this newly depraved and enslaved will. But his "choice" and our "choices" are not the same.
However, even if one were to object to the above by suggesting that Adam's choice and ours are the same (thereby somehow suggesting that Adam was already depraved and a slave to sin; which entails it's own problems...) then the initial question still remains...Why did he "will" this?
That lesson is hotly debated between those who have learned it and those who have yet to.
No "lesson" was forth-coming, as there was no answer provided other than the fact that some hold to a Theology incapable of reasonably suggesting an answer to an interesting and fruitful question, and therefore default to decreeing it meaningless out of hand.
Semantics.Category mistake....the question is not properly classified as either "right" or "wrong". Possibly....it might be pointless or un-answerable (although I don't think so)...but it isn't "wrong".
Because noncalvinists are constantly trying to justify God's ways to the carnal mind. The Calvinists isn't so much concerned with the why of God's will as they are with the what. The Calvinist asks, "What is thy will," not "Why is thy will?"Of course he does...why are Calvinists constantly harping on this?
It's the differences that teach us. However, free will is an illusion. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit. Neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Disobedience is merely evidence of corruption, not the cause of it.Not likely....according to Calvinistic thought...we can little compare ourselves to Adam in that he had something of a "genuine" freedom of choice (as a not pre-corrupted slave to sin already) and it is only through or after his choice that we who are "dead" in him, have this newly depraved and enslaved will. But his "choice" and our "choices" are not the same.
For Christ.However, even if one were to object to the above by suggesting that Adam's choice and ours are the same (thereby somehow suggesting that Adam was already depraved and a slave to sin; which entails it's own problems...) then the initial question still remains...Why did he "will" this?
It's only interesting and fruitful from a certain premise. Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, "Why hast thou made me thus?" Paul smacks that kind of questioning down. It springs from a rebellious heart.No "lesson" was forth-coming, as there was no answer provided other than the fact that some hold to a Theology incapable of reasonably suggesting an answer to an interesting and fruitful question, and therefore default to decreeing it meaningless out of hand.