Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I'm not following. Jesus was telling the RYR (who had knowledge of the Law, I might add) to come to Him in faith. What knowledge of the Law do babies posses? It sounds like you are espousing a works salvation, that man can come to the Father apart from Christ by keeping commandments. Sinners are saved by grace through faith. Period. There is no other way. Infants and babies are not sinners, though. A sinners is defined as one who commits sin. The phrase "I'm not a sinner because I sin, I sin because I'm a sinner" is bunk. This same logic doesn't apply to actual sins. A murder is a murderer because they have murdered, a rapist a rapist because they have commited rape, etc.So you think Jesus lied to the Lawyer?
Luk 10:25 And behold, a lawyer stood up to put him to the test, saying, "Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?"
Luk 10:26 He said to him, "What is written in the Law? How do you read it?"
Luk 10:27 And he answered, "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind, and your neighbor as yourself."
Luk 10:28 And he said to him, "You have answered correctly; do this, and you will live."
I agree that babies are corrupted...that's because of sin entering the world. It is appointed unto all ONCE to die. This is the curse on our physical bodies, infants included.Babies are sinful. They are corrupted. Yet because they have kept the commandments, the blood of Christ cleanses their "sin nature" ala the Old covenant. God made a promise to all who would keep His commandments. And He cannot break it.
...or all babies are NOT sinners, and Christ the mediator on their behalf bridges the gap between humanity and God. Christ still receives all the praise. His death and resurrection ensured that everyone (remember...ALL are appointed once to die) can also share in the same. If He would have failed on the cross, all humanity would be damned by default.This is the ONLY way, that Christ gets the Glory for saving all of humanity. If Babies are NOT born sinful, then the either the VAST majority of people in Heaven will NOT be praising Christ for saving them throughout all eternity (which would contradict scripture), or accordingly with "free will" beliefs, ALL babies go to Hell, because they cannot have faith in Christ.
ReformedBaptist said:
...and so goes the "other dispensation" of salvation I mentioned earlier. NOBODY is saved because they are elect. Everyone falls under 2 camps: guilty or not guilty. Sinners are guilty, infants are not. Sinners require faith in Christ, infants do not.Spurgeon said:On what ground, then, do we believe the child to be saved? We believe it to be as lost on the rest of mankind, and as truly condemned by the sentence which said, "In the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." It is saved because it is elect. In the compass of election, in the Lamb's Book of Life, we believe there shall be found written millions of souls who are only shown on earth, and then stretch their wings for heaven. They are saved, too, because they were redeemed by the precious blood of Jesus Christ.
Amy.G said:Such a tired old line. Everyone who disagrees with someone else's interpretation thinks God is a liar.
![]()
How do babies keep the commandments? And if they could keep them, they would be saved by works and not grace.
That is not "free will" beliefs.
Ed Edwards said:Somehow I can't See Messiah Yeshua supervising the frying of babies.
Rev 14:10 (Geneva Bible, 1599 Edition):
The same shall drinke of the wine of ye wrath of God, yea, of the pure wine, which is powred into the cup of his wrath, and he shalbe tormented in fire and brimstone before the holy Angels, and before the Lambe.
God prohibits humans from bruning babies. Note that bruning babies is compareed by co-location to witchcraft & the occult arts. Both are abominations before the Lord God.
Deut 13:10-12 (NIV):
No one among you is to make his son or daughter pass through the fire, practice divination, tell fortunes, interpret omens, practice sorcery,
11 cast spells, consult a medium or a familiar spirit, or inquire of the dead.
12 Everyone who does these things is detestable to the Lord, and the Lord your God is driving out the nations before you because of these detestable things.
Ed's Conclusion: No babies in Hell or Lake of Fire. If you find a verse that appears to assign babies to such a vile eternal fate - look again, you may have misunderstootd???
Babies are born to die naturally, but mostly they don't die as soon as they are born. They are also born after Adam and when they come to know God and Glorify Him not it is sin.Havensdad said:So you think Jesus lied to the Lawyer?
Luk 10:25 And behold, a lawyer stood up to put him to the test, saying, "Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?"
Luk 10:26 He said to him, "What is written in the Law? How do you read it?"
Luk 10:27 And he answered, "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind, and your neighbor as yourself."
Luk 10:28 And he said to him, "You have answered correctly; do this, and you will live."
Babies are sinful. They are corrupted. Yet because they have kept the commandments, the blood of Christ cleanses their "sin nature" ala the Old covenant. God made a promise to all who would keep His commandments. And He cannot break it.
This is the ONLY way, that Christ gets the Glory for saving all of humanity. If Babies are NOT born sinful, then the either the VAST majority of people in Heaven will NOT be praising Christ for saving them throughout all eternity (which would contradict scripture), or accordingly with "free will" beliefs, ALL babies go to Hell, because they cannot have faith in Christ.
Only a baby that is born sinful, yet saved by Christs blood in accordance with the promise of God Himself, makes sense in light of scripture. This would mean ALL babies would end up in Heaven, and that they would still sing praises to Christ for there redemption.
webdog said:...and so goes the "other dispensation" of salvation I mentioned earlier. NOBODY is saved because they are elect. Everyone falls under 2 camps: guilty or not guilty. Sinners are guilty, infants are not. Sinners require faith in Christ, infants do not.
We keep the Law through Christ. He fulfilled the Law. We are righteous in Him, not works.Havensdad said:Really? Jesus told the Lawyer whoever perfectly kept the commandments, would receive eternal life. If someone DENIES that, they are calling Him a liar. Let me show you...
ME: "I have a red car"
YOU: "No you don't"
See? In the scenario above, you just called me a liar. Since God, MULTIPLE times, throughout the Bible, states that those who keep the commandments will receive eternal life, live, etc., to say OTHERWISE is to call God a liar.
Babies do not keep the commandments. You can't "keep" that which you do not know exits. They have committed no sin, which makes them innocent. They have not transgressed the Law. Sin is disobedience with knowledgeHave babies lied? Nope. Have they stolen? Nope. Have they hated anyone? Nope. Have they ever put anything above God? Nope.
They have perfectly kept the commandments. Therefore the Blood of Christ is applied for their sin nature, and they are saved by Grace, just like the rest of us.
Please provide scripture that states that a "sin nature" is condemned as sin.Are the Old Testament Saints saved by works? No. Neither are Babies. The fact that they keep the commandments perfectly would do them NO GOOD: their sin nature would still condemn them as a thing worthy of eternal punishment, yet Christ's atoning blood pays for it, and they are therefore saved by Grace, just like everyone else.
I have never seen anyone on this board say that babies must have faith. In fact, quite the opposite has been stated many times. Babies do not have the intellect required to have faith. They also cannot break laws that they are not aware of. Sin is a willful rebellion against God, having the knowledge that one is rebelling against their creator.Anyone that states salvation MUST be according to faith, with faith being something one "chooses", automatically eliminates babies from eternity in Heaven. Babies cannot "choose" to have faith.
We die because we suffer the consequences of Adam's sin, but we are not held accountable for his sin. We are accountable for our own sin. We die spiritually when we commit sin.ReformedBaptist said:I will only make a few comments, but will not debate the issue. That the infant is gulitless is refuted easily by the fact that the child dies. The wage of sin is death.
Wages of sin is the "second" death.ReformedBaptist said:I will only make a few comments, but will not debate the issue. That the infant is gulitless is refuted easily by the fact that the child dies. The wage of sin is death.
Brother Bob said:Wages of sin is the "second" death.
The natural death is an appointment.
BBob,
Amy.G said:We die because we suffer the consequences of Adam's sin, but we are not held accountable for his sin. We are accountable for our own sin. We die spiritually when we commit sin.
The soul that sins shall die. God makes it clear that we are never punished for someone else's sin. We do not inherit Adam's guilt. Our guilt is our own. We inherit the consequence of his sin, physical death.
We die once physically. We die spiritually when we sin willfully, just as Adam did. Those who have died spiritually (have sinned) will die the second death (which is eternal) in the lake of fire if they have not been born again from the first spiritual death. Babies have not died spiritually because they have committed no sin. They do not need to be re-born because they are not spiritually dead.ReformedBaptist said:Where is the "second" death stated or implied in the text of Scripture? How does this interpretation work with the judgment passed upon Adam and with his posterity, especially as it relates to the teaching in Romans concerning Christ, being the Second Adam?
Jesus is the second Adam, who came from the Father (as did Adam), had no earthly father (as Adam) but lived a sinless life because He was always obedient to the Father reconciling us to the relationship with God that the first Adam had.ReformedBaptist said:How then is Jesus the Second Adam. If we do not inherit (or rather have imputed) guilt, how is it that we can inherit (or rather have imputed) righteousness?
Rev 21:8But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.ReformedBaptist said:Where is the "second" death stated or implied in the text of Scripture? How does this interpretation work with the judgment passed upon Adam and with his posterity, especially as it relates to the teaching in Romans concerning Christ, being the Second Adam?
...and your point is easily refuted because Jesus died physically. You dare say He was guiltless, or His death was the result of being a sinner??ReformedBaptist said:I will only make a few comments, but will not debate the issue. That the infant is gulitless is refuted easily by the fact that the child dies. The wage of sin is death.
I think we too often have the wrong look at death. I think we view it differently than what it truly teaches us....and your point is easily refuted because Jesus died physically. You dare say He was guiltless, or His death was the result of being a sinner??