• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Bad News for Artsy Types

Jerome

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Broadman & Holman author Jane Chu is chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts and posted this yesterday:

www.arts.gov/news/2017/statement-national-endowment-arts-chairman-jane-chu-fy-18-budget
Today we learned that the President’s FY 2018 budget blueprint proposes the elimination of the National Endowment for the Arts. We are disappointed because we see our funding actively making a difference with individuals of all ages in thousands of communities...
Oachita Baptist University profile of alumna Jane Chu
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Last edited by a moderator:

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Should taxpayer money be used to build pro sports team's stadiums? If you say no, you also have to say no to taxpayer support for the arts.

Why should wealthy arts patrons get taxpayer support?

Sent from my Moto Droid Turbo.
 

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
Should taxpayer money be used to build pro sports team's stadiums? If you say no, you also have to say no to taxpayer support for the arts.

Why should wealthy arts patrons get taxpayer support?
.

Here in Syracuse, the State tore down the St Fair Grandstand - and then help pay part of the 50 million dollar pricetag to build an
amphitheater adjacent to the Fair grounds.

Then NY spent another 50 million dollars on improvements at the St Fair.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Should taxpayer money be used to build pro sports team's stadiums? If you say no, you also have to say no to taxpayer support for the arts.

Why should wealthy arts patrons get taxpayer support?

Sent from my Moto Droid Turbo.
Wealthy arts patrons? This funding supported the development of the arts in the U.S. for everyone. If you want us to be a country that doesn't support classical music, painting, the theater, etc. then just watch your football games and say that's it. I for one appreciate the arts.
 

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
Since we are 20 trillion in debt - we need to do a lot of cutting!!!
If money was available - that would be another story.
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Wealthy arts patrons? This funding supported the development of the arts in the U.S. for everyone. If you want us to be a country that doesn't support classical music, painting, the theater, etc. then just watch your football games and say that's it. I for one appreciate the arts.
Yes, wealthy arts patrons. Have you been to see the orchestra? An art museum? Gone to the theater lately? It's not cheap.

Look up the social profiles of the people that are active in the arts community. Most of them are wealthy. Why should taxpayers support their passion?

The country should have no role in supporting the arts. Individuals may do so voluntarily.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
 

The American Dream

Member
Site Supporter
What does the federal government or the Constitution have to do with the arts? It is the government's job to protect its citizens, not paint silly paintings or support ice skating and ballet. What a waste of money. Our nation needs skilled craftsmen and women to rebuild our infrastructure. For those that like to look at painting, see Broadway plays, and keep up with what the movie stars are doing, spend your own money enjoying it, not mine.
 

777

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yeah, I don't see what the big deal is in abolishing this funding at all - it was appropriated by an act of Congress in 1965 and has had its day. It's easy to argue that the culture of 2017 is far inferior to that of six decades ago.

I'm also in favor of gutting PBS - with the gadzillion cable channels out there now, PBS isn't necessary anymore. Axe it.
 

Rob_BW

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
But without the National Endowment for the Arts, who will fund monetary awards to guys who give us such wonderful pieces of art as a photograph of a crucifix submerged in the artist's own urine?
 
Top