Darron Steele
New Member
Deleted by poster.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Well, unfortunately, from what I see in Scripture, it is not our call.Pastor Larry said:...
So you would baptize someone that you would immediately have to exercise church discipline on? I have a real struggle with that.
Again, Jesus Christ did not give me the option of not baptizing the new Christian.If someone is "not letting go of sin" then don't baptize them until they do.
If he is a Christian, then absolutely.Pastor Larry said:Are you really going to baptize someone who says, "I know living with my girlfriend is sin, and I shouldn't be doing it, but I like it too much to stop. But I want to get baptized"?
As the one doing the baptizing, or as a member of the one who is to guard the church, it most certainly is your call.Well, unfortunately, from what I see in Scripture, it is not our call.
Yes, and part of the process is confronting the person living in sin ... not pretending like it is no big deal and letting them continue to play the game of Christianity.However, does not Scripture require a multi-step program before the matter is brought toward the whole congregation? That is what I see in Matthew 18.
Of course not. But how do you know they are a Christian?Again, Jesus Christ did not give me the option of not baptizing the new Christian.
Again, how will you know that? A persons who is living in open unrepentant sin is giving no evidence of being a Christian.If he is a Christian, then absolutely.
So you are advocating John's baptism? I'll take baptism into Jesus thank you.Tom Butler said:When Paul wrote to the church at Corinth, he blistered the congregation for failure to deal with a member who was involved in an illicit relationship with his father's wife. In I Cor 5, he told them to kick this man out of the congregation. He, Paul, said he'd already passed judgment on the situation, even though he wasn't there. Part of Paul's tirade was that the congregation was not upset about it, and in fact seem to be "glorying" in it. Paul was not only casting stones, he was hurling boulders at the Corinthian congregation. He told the members, "don't even eat with this guy."
I'm also reminded that when some Pharisees and Sadducees came to John the Baptist, asking for baptism, he didn't mince words. He called them a "generation of vipers," and demanded that they first show evidence of repentance. (Matt 3: 7-8).
The situation described in the OP is a no-brainer.
This entire thread is based on the premise that baptism requires water. DHK cites what is called the great commission and fails to see that the command says nothing about water.FriendofSpurgeon said:Scenario:
Susan attends a Baptist church. Susan's close friend (Julie) and Julie's boyfriend (Tom) have been visiting her church quite regularly. Recently Julie went forward during an invitation for a profession of faith. She also wanted to be baptized. The pastor has refused to baptize her since she and Tom are living together.
This is a true story, though names have been changed. So what say you? What is the correct Scriptural stance on this?
Since it is impossible for any human to baptize a person into the Spirit (that is God's work, not ours), the medium must be water. That is a given. Translated correctly the word baptize means immerse. They are to be immersed in the name of of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.trustitl said:This entire thread is based on the premise that baptism requires water. DHK cites what is called the great commission and fails to see that the command says nothing about water.
trustitl said:So you are advocating John's baptism? I'll take baptism into Jesus thank you.
You know as well as I do that these were two distinct baptisms. You have taken from John's baptism something you want to be a part of being baptized in Jesus name.Tom Butler said:That's not my point. Just as John the Baptist demanded evidence of repentance from the Pharisees and Sadducees, should we not baptize only those who have repented of their sins and trusted Christ for salvation.
I'm not getting into that debate pitting John's baptism against the baptism by Jesus disciples--except to point out that Jesus submitted to it and endorsed John's ministry.
Why was John baptizing where the was much water (JOhn 3)? Why was Jesus baptized by going down into the water and coming back out? Why was the Ethiopian eunuch baptized where there was water to go down into and back out of?This entire thread is based on the premise that baptism requires water. DHK cites what is called the great commission and fails to see that the command says nothing about water.
That's what Jesus said to do.We are to baptize people in "the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost". People have sadly turned this into a ritual requiring a person to become wet while the mantra "in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost" is recited.
Once again you twist the words. I cited the command to immerse or baptize in the name of something and you say "it is impossible for any human to baptize a person in the Spirit."DHK said:Since it is impossible for any human to baptize a person into the Spirit (that is God's work, not ours), the medium must be water. That is a given. Translated correctly the word baptize means immerse. They are to be immersed in the name of of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.
trustitl said:This entire thread is based on the premise that baptism requires water. DHK cites what is called the great commission and fails to see that the command says nothing about water.
We are to baptize people in "the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost". People have sadly turned this into a ritual requiring a person to become wet while the mantra "in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost" is recited.
As long as this is misunderstood, the church will be divided over what mode of applying the water is "biblical", who gets to perform this "sacrament", when it should be done, and a myriad of other issues that divide the body of Christ.
"Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?" Romans 6:3
I'll take this baptism over the infant baptism my parents had performed on me and the "believers baptism" I once thought I needed to do any time.
I would say it this way:annsni said:Baptism MEANS immersion - and when it's a sign of our identity with Christ in His burial and resurrection. That's Scriptural.
As you say, the name represents the person.trustitl said:Once again you twist the words. I cited the command to immerse or baptize in the name of something and you say "it is impossible for any human to baptize a person in the Spirit."
The "name" of Jesus represents who he is. That is what we are to immerse them into. That is making a disciple.
"Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.
It is water baptism; there is no doubt about it.baptizō
Thayer Definition:
1) to dip repeatedly, to immerse, to submerge (of vessels sunk)
2) to cleanse by dipping or submerging, to wash, to make clean with water, to wash one’s self, bathe
Necessary for what? Not for salvation, to be sure. But it is necessary for obedience. The command to baptize people is the command to be baptized.Water baptism is not necessary.
It is an act of obedience.I will ... allow the former to be an act of conscience.
And Spirit baptism isn't metaphysical? It is the ultimate example of metaphysical.DHK said:As you say, the name represents the person.
One doesn't baptism "into a name." That is an impossibility. You are being entirely too metaphysical if not existential. The Bible was not meant to be read like that, but was written in Koine Greek (common Greek) to be understood for the common person, not for the highly educated philosophers. In fact Paul speaks against that class of people in 1Cor.1.
One is baptized by the Spirit once and only once--when he is saved. Man cannot do that. The action is done by God. It is Christ that saves; not man. Or do you believe that salvation is of man?trustitl said:And Spirit baptism isn't metaphysical? It is the ultimate example of metaphysical.
Is there a verse that talks about the Spirit baptizing us? I have heard of being baptized in or with the Spirit, but not by BY the Spirit. Just curious.DHK said:One is baptized by the Spirit once and only once--when he is saved.
Why do you ask me this on almost every topic? Is there something I say that makes you think I teach that we save ourselves.DHK said:Man cannot do that. The action is done by God. It is Christ that saves; not man. Or do you believe that salvation is of man?
Here again is baptized BY the Spirit.DHK said:Salvation is by grace through faith, not of works--it is a gift of God.
It happens when one trusts Christ as their Saviour, and that is when one is baptized by the Spirit; the only Spirit-baptism that takes place.
You have water baptism after salvation and after being a disciple? Explain how you scripturally arrived at this and how this plays out in a person's life. For example, how long does one have to be a disciple to get baptized and how does one prove ones discipleship? Also, who is the person that determines these things?DHK said:However that baptism in the Great Commission takes place after salvation; after discipleship. There are not two Spirit baptisms. There is only one that takes place at salvation. This baptism in the Great Commission is commanded by Jesus to be carried out by His disciples. The disciples do not carry around the Holy Spirit in their pockets to disperse on every new believer. They immerse new believers in water, as the Lord commanded them.