Nope. Murder is murder. There's no reason for anyone not carrying a weapon to be riddled with bullets by the police. And it didn't happen just once but again and again and again. So I'm being honest when I say that not a single unarmed person should be dead at the hands of police fire.
That makes about as much sense as thinking we should not have gone into Iraq because the Media says there were no weapons of mass destruction.
Only the fool rattles the imaginary sabre.
And we have been through this. You present a caricature of people based on very limited experience. If anyone has a reason to hate Police Officers, I think I qualify a little more than you, my friend. I have been beaten by corrupt cops, and, they tried to literally kill me by throwing me off a cliff.
Do I hate cops? Nope, because I know what this country would be like without them.
In theory I agree, when an unarmed citizen is shot, the system has failed. However, in practical terms, if a police officer feels threatened, and their orders are not complied with...
...don't whine about getting shot.
Just because a citizen, black or white, red or yellow, isn't armed, doesn't mean they are not potentially lethal. If you don't understand that, then you are not dealing with facts, simply those details relevant to your caricature of reality.
And save the stupid compliance defense as many complied and are still dead.
I don't deny there have been and probably will be bad handlings and unjustified shooting. Doesn't make the responsibility of the citizen to comply with the Law any less.
And it is particularly foolish to try to justify any non-compliance.
What reason, Zaac, does any citizen have not to comply with an Officer of the Law?
Continued...