Heir...how do you define the word "heretic"? I will say up front that my personal "take" on heresy is ...anything that teaches any concept of salvation contrary to OR IN ADDITION TO "salvation by grace through faith in the finished work of Christ". Doc Ruckman does teach some things that would definitely be strange to some but as far as I can tell he preaches a straight Gospel and holds to the established "fundamentals" of the historical, Biblical Christian faith.....as far as I know.
As for Cody....I cannot bring myself to label him as a heretic. It is obvious that he is a follower of Doc Ruckman and has a high degree of respect for his teachings. The term "Ruckmanite" is, in my opinion, simply a label that was invented by folks that don't like the position or stand that Dr. Ruckman takes about the Word of God. There are plenty of good Christian people who "follow" and "respect" the teachings of men who are in positions of "leadership" that they have either placed themselves in or been "elevated" into by the people they serve. We wouldn't normally ascribe the "ite" label to them. I for one had great respect (and still do) for the late Bro.Lester Roloff...but I'm not a "Roloff"ite" or anything. I just think we need to refrain from calling other Gospel-preaching,teaching Bible-believing Christians "heretics". Joseph Smith was a heretic, Ellen G. White was a heretic, JW's are heretics, Benny Hinn and Creflo Dollar are heretics...Bro. Cody and Dr. Ruckman are not, by definition, heretics. I don't believe Cody is a heretic. I just think he has a large degree of respect for the Bible teacher that taught him to NEVER DOUBT the Book he holds in his hand. I will say in the open HERE that it was at least partially the writings of Dr. Ruckman that helped me to settle the matter of where I stood about the Bible while I was a resident of Bro.Roloff's homes in Texas back in the early 80's. I'm not ashamed to say that here but I am no "Ruckmanite"...if there even is really such a thing. I am a Bible-Believer and if I must wear a label then I am happy to wear that one. I don't think I'll have to apologize to God for being THAT. Beyond that...I do think Peter Ruckman is kinda mean ...kinda like a Christian "junkyard dog". If I was opposed to him I think I would simply avoid him...because I know I'm neither smart enough nor aggressive or "mean" enough to go toe-to-toe with a guy like him in verbal or intellectual "combat". That said...If I was in a war (and we are) I think I'd like to have two things on my side...Peter Ruckman and a bunch of those Israeli soldiers from the IDF. I think my chances of winning would go UP dramatically! The man is a genius of sorts. He just doesn't (and never did) lay down and "take" the nasty things people said about him. He committed the BIG sin in Christendom....he FIRED back.....and HIT what he was aiming at! I'm not saying he was right OR wrong. We all know that men like Joshua, David, Peter, and Paul and others in the Bible had their agressive, combative moments. God used them...sometimes, as David..in bloody physical combat... and sometimes, like Paul to call out false doctrine and false teachers BY NAME. Even our Lord Jesus called some of His contemporaries a "generation of vipers" (modern english.. a bunch of snakes). None of these men would have "played well" with the faint-hearted. The Bible...and the men and women of the Bible are a BLOODY and blood-stained bunch. Any way... we need to be careful about our use of the word "heretic". I personally hope Cody can get his deal worked out and bring his site back. There is value in it.....just like there is value in THIS site. At least I won't get ridiculed for my convictions about the Bible over there.
Bro.Greg:saint: