1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Bible Translation

Discussion in 'Other Discussions' started by FriendofSpurgeon, Jan 6, 2009.

  1. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    5
    This post is for Jim. You have caused me to do something bad. I ordered a Cambridge! Any bible that can last 45 years is one I have to have. :laugh:

    :love2:
     
  2. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    No Ed,DE is not the most accurate description for the NIV.The NIV uses "optimal equivalence" though the term wasn't even around then.It's translational method could also be called "essentially literal" though that term was not coined yet.In the 4-page Preface to my NIV the term "dynamic equivalence" is not used at all.

    Elsewhere I have demonstrated the close affinity that the HCSB has with the TNIV.The translational methods are nearly identical;the differences are a matter of degree,not kind.

    Let's look at the English Bible scene in 1978.That was the year in which the Old and New Testaments of the NIV were published.

    On the more formally-equivalent side there was the NASB (1971)

    RSV Common Bible (1973)

    Mediating Version Between Formal and Dynamic --

    MLB (1969)

    Dynamic Versions

    JB (1966)

    Phillips Version (1972)

    NEB (1970)

    TEV (1976)

    LB (1971)

    These were the major versions at the time.The NIV was clearly more formally-equivalent than five of them.Two were clearly more formally-equivalent than the NIV.And one was a bit more formally-equivalent than the NIV.

    If one wanted to assign numbers to these various versions to categorize them -- the smaller the number means it's more formally-equivalent.The larger the number means that it is more dynamic.Here is my arbitrary system.

    LB --100
    TEV --90
    NEB --80
    PV --70
    JB -- 60
    NIV --30
    MLB - 25
    RSV -- 20
    NASB --10

    The NIV lands somewhere in the middle --tending toward the more formally-equivalent model.Five to the left of it and three to the right.
     
  3. Jim1999

    Jim1999 <img src =/Jim1999.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,460
    Likes Received:
    1
    Sorry. It is not for sale. Besides, with all the notes and corrections notated, I would have to charge for a full set of commentaries. Why it even has sermons in it...........:saint:
    It as printed in Great Britain on india paper with a full leather cover. It was a gift on my entering the Bible College.


    Cheers,

    Jim
     
  4. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    5
    Oh, I know. I purchased my own! Except there are no notes.....yet.

    It is also leather with India paper. I wasn't kidding. I really did order one from Cambridge Bibles.com!
     
  5. Jim1999

    Jim1999 <img src =/Jim1999.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,460
    Likes Received:
    1
    Now remember to break it in correctly...small sections back and front, working to the middle and never leave it sitting open at a given page. The tendency is to put weight on it before it is fully broken in. I might come back in 64 years to have an eye on it.............:wavey:

    Cheers,

    Jim
     
  6. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    5
    Thanks for the tips Jim. Seriously, every time I use it, I will think of you. :)

    In 64 years, you and I will be in the same place. See you there!
     
  7. Marcia

    Marcia Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    1
    Does LB stand for Living Bible? I thought that was a paraphrase?
     
  8. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yeah,it's a paraphrase or a very free dynamic!
     
  9. Marcia

    Marcia Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    1
    I thought so.

    I bought one of these as a brand new believer because it had pictures in it. I really liked it because of the pictures (!)but somehow found out a few months later it was a paraphrase. So I got rid of it and got another Bible.
     
  10. Jim1999

    Jim1999 <img src =/Jim1999.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,460
    Likes Received:
    1
  11. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    5
    It still works though! I love all your notes. I was trying to read all of them, but I wasn't able to make all of them out. (print was small in the photo) What a treasure that book is!
     
  12. Jim1999

    Jim1999 <img src =/Jim1999.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,460
    Likes Received:
    1
    Amy: I'll try to scan some more for you. It almost takes me forevr to figure out the scan thing.

    Cheers,

    Jim
     
  13. annsni

    annsni Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,914
    Likes Received:
    706
    Amy - I was thinking the same thing - that was a picture of a treasure. :)
     
  14. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    5
    You're doing better than me Jim. I haven't figured out that scan thing yet! :laugh:

    I look forward to seeing more pics. :thumbsup:
     
  15. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    No,it was not the Living Bible.The one with the drawings was the Good News Bible (GNB). A Swiss woman,Annie Vallotton, made 500 line drawings for it. She's now very old and still loves to teach the Bible to children.She's regarded as the world's best-selling artist.

    Later this Bible was called Today's English Version.In 2001,since many called it a paraphrase when it was indeed translated -- it was renamed The Good News Translation (GNT).
     
  16. Spinach

    Spinach New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2008
    Messages:
    984
    Likes Received:
    0
    This thread is a bit debatee for the fellowship forum, imo.

    As far as the OP goes, I use the KJV and have my whole life. I have a Cambridge and a Thompson Chain. Dh has a wide-margin Cambridge (2, actually).
     
  17. Jim1999

    Jim1999 <img src =/Jim1999.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,460
    Likes Received:
    1
    The difference here, for the most part, we are just talking and not fighting.

    Cheers,

    Jim
     
  18. mcdirector

    mcdirector Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    8,292
    Likes Received:
    11
    Talking is nice.
     
  19. Marcia

    Marcia Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    1
    No, it was a Living Bible. There was an edition of it that had colored pictures (this was in '91). I know the Good News Bible and it was not that one. It was a Living Bible - my memory on that is vividly, crystal clear!!
     
  20. Marcia

    Marcia Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    1
    You really think so, Spinach? I think it's all friendly talk and joshing.
     
Loading...