Originally posted by Bartimaeus:
Boaz and Ruth had a "marrriage by covenant".
Boaz made public announcement that if the next of kin would not fulfil his responsibility, he would.
He promised publically before the people.
He bought back the fields of his family member and restored them publically to Ruth.
He took her into his household to have and raise up children unto her previous heritage.
Marriage is to the family what the ordinaces are to the church. It is an act of worship. The State has intervened. It has no right to be intervening. It has no Biblical position to be involved in an act of worship. Marriage is a basic right of man, period. I do not need a state, any state to give me permission to do what God has told me I already have a right to do. God is my authority. The state has already without exception exercised authority over it's marriages. That fact cannot be denied in law or in history. Bro Larry already has stated his inadequacy in knowledge of the law.
The Ohio State Bar association puts out a pamphlet on this very issue. I quote, "Actually, when you repeat your marriage vows you enter into a legal contract. There are three parties to that contract: 1. You; 2. Your husband or wife, as the case may be; and 3. The State of Ohio. The state is a party to the contract because under its laws, you have certain duties to each other and to Ohio." Taken from "With this ring I thee wed", Ohio State Bar Association.
I am providing this information so that we may understand what it is that the state says about the issue of marriage. How can we obey according to Rom 13 without knowing the mindset of the state concerning the issue? So....I quote more: West's Law Encyclopedia next.
Section 1 Definition and Nature
A marriage is the union of one man and one woman for so long as they both shall live, to the exclusion of all others, by and obligation which, during that time, the parties cannot, of their own volition and act, dissolve, but which can be dissolved only by the authority of the State. Our Legislature has declared that marriage is a civil contract into which males of the age of eighteen and females of the age of sixteen, not nearer of kin than second cousins, and not having a husband or wife living, are capable of entering.
The purpose of the statutory characterization of marriage as a civil contract is to place the subject of marriage under the control of the civil authorities to the exclusion of the ecclesiastical. Under this statute marriage is a status founded on contract and is an institution regulated and controlled by law upon principles of public policy. Marriage has been futher described as a contract in which the public is interested, and to which the State is a party. (end of quote)
Try as you might you will not, I repeat you will not find any scripture authorizing the state to be involved in the covenant of marriage. As far as a Holy Marriage, it is a covenant between God as the only Authority, and the man and woman. It is done in front of witnesses and with a Minister of the Word of God present. This marriage is consumated by the stating of the marriage vows and cohabitation of a conjunal nature (act of marriage). The State marriage is consummated by a signed and delivered document by the minister who dispenses the vows, (info given upon request). When the state issues the lisence it becomes the prevailing third party to the contract. The state assumes total jurisdiction over the contract. It may without warning take over total control of the marriage and any offspring that the marriage produces, (info given upon req.). You might ramble on about Romans 13, but that does not give the state the right to be involved as a "Party". Romans 13 gives no authority for the public to be interested in a Holy Marriage and certainly not to be goveerned by "public policy". We know where "public policy" is headed today, not lisencensure, but licentiousnous. In a state approved marriage there is a servant master relationship. God has said,
Luke 16:13 No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.