Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
What law?..........
"[T]he Court has received several sworn affidavits that Taitz asked potential witnesses that she planned to call before this Court to perjure themselves," writes Carter. "This Court is deeply concerned that Taitz may have suborned perjury through witnesses she intended to bring before this Court."
The law for choosing the president as interpreted by the courts again and again and again and again and again.
Congress acknowledged his qualifications. The courts have rule again and again and again and again and again.
It is time to recognise the jurisdiction of the courts.
This refusal of patriotic Americans to acknowledge the court system is worrying.
From the article:
Really was it worrying when the courts supported slavery? Is it worrying that the courts support the slaughter of millions of unborn children every year? I do not know if he is or is not legitimate. But his failure to present the long form BC is questionable as is his more than one million dollars spent to keep him from doing so.
Regardless of one's opinion on Obama, the "Obama's not really a citizen" folks are nothing short of tinfoil-hat quacks who are either idiots, or ignorant by choice. Mature and discerning Christians would do well to disassociate themselves from such persons in the same manner that one should disassociate oneself from members of Westboro Baptist Church.
Barack Obama will not be removed from office based on this birth certificate issue. The energy spent on this would be much, much better spent trying to elect truly limited government advocates to office in 2010 and 2012 and in promoting limited government alternatives to the bad ideas of the current occupants of public office in Washington, D.C., the various statehouses, and the cities.
Barack Obama will not be removed from office based on this birth certificate issue. The energy spent on this would be much, much better spent trying to elect truly limited government advocates to office in 2010 and 2012 and in promoting limited government alternatives to the bad ideas of the current occupants of public office in Washington, D.C., the various statehouses, and the cities.
The listing of Obama's father as African American (instead of Negro, the phrase used in the '60's) is reason enough for me to question the validity of his BC. I think the ignorant ones here are the ones who fail to look at all of the facts involved and just dismiss this claim.
BTW, I have many hats...but none are made of tinfoil
Given the countless times the "Obama's not really a citizen" folks filed cases and had them tossed for lack of any merit whatsoever, pettiness and childishness are traits belonging to them, and not their critics.But it does make you look petty and childish.
The listing of Obama's father as African American (instead of Negro, the phrase used in the '60's) is reason enough for me to question the validity of his BC.
I still would like to see the actual document, not what some state official tells me it says! I would think any concerned citizen would at this point, after seeing how he operates.
African is not a race, and it was not the verbiage used in the '60's.
I'll concede that I used African "American", but semantics aside African is not a race, period. To use that on an official document would not have happened. I do have evidence that Negro was used on a Hawaii BC in the '60's, it has been posted here before. We are not talking of "every state of the union", we are talking about Obama's Hawaii BC, and I doubt any state would use or would have used "African", as it is NOT a race.It is also not the 'African-American' that you claimed was there.
I would find it hard to determine that every official in every state in the Union used the exact same term for blacks in 1960. Do you have evidence that 'African' was not used in State of Hawaii except in this instance?