• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Black Lives Matter Mission

Zaac

Well-Known Member
No, you choose to ignore the fact that not every white person is not a racist.

And you chose to assume that I have said every white person is a racist when I clearly didn't. So stop with the race baiting that yall are so quick to blame others of. You're just trying to use the emotion of white people being called racist to win the support of the others. You already got it so no need for the emotional plea.

You categorically accuse others based on skin color.
I haven't categorically accused anyone of anything. I've categorically told you what history shows. You'll have to take history up with those who lived it.
You are prejudiced. You are guilty of the sin that you claim to crusade against.
Oh I'm definitely prejudiced against the head in the ground syndrome displayed by most of ya on here.



SNIP

I truly think that you and a lot of other white people think that folks are supposed to just roll over and say yes sir you are right just because you say so.

I've said what I need to about the dismissal of what Blacks say by Whites. You don't have to agree. I didn't expect you to.

Good night and have an incredible Sunday worship.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Rolfe

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Zaac- The fact is that your reputation is what it is, and that it is based on your own actions. Call me a racist all you like, and I am confident that my reputation would not support the claim. I would assert that yours would not weather such scrutiny.

This is all that I will say on the matter. You may have the last word.
 

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Regardless, I wanted to see what they really stood for. And now that I've been to their website, and have seen their demands, I absolutely stand against them. Where once I thought that they might be misguided, but well intentioned people, I now see the movement as something malicious.

Thanks Sapper for a well thought out, and extremely we'll researched article on this group.

I have looked at this group too and found it is a group of malcontents and misfits who out grew the "Occupy" movement; old Acorn anarchists; ex-Black Panthers; and surprisingly, sprinkled in the midst of the BLM are radical Muslims. The mixture of social outcasts leading this group will more than likely fail as we can clearly see the protests are less populated with protesters each time they rise up against another shooting.

The majority of blacks do not feel this group is properly representing their concerns as well as how they go about making a point. Hopefully, using a movie term, the BLM will slowly fade to black.

AGAIN, you get my big :thumbsup:
 

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
And you chose to assume that I have said every white person is a racist when I clearly didn't. So stop with the race baiting that yall are so quick to blame others of. You're just trying to use the emotion of white people being called racist to win the support of the others. You already got it so no need for the emotional plea.

I haven't categorically accused anyone of anything. I've categorically told you what history shows. You'll have to take history up with those who lived it.
Oh I'm definitely prejudiced against the head in the ground syndrome displayed by most of ya on here.



SNIP

I truly think that you and a lot of other white people think that folks are supposed to just roll over and say yes sir you are right just because you say so.

I've said what I need to about the dismissal of what Blacks say by Whites. You don't have to agree. I didn't expect you to.

Good night and have an incredible Sunday worship.


More of the same brother. Do you have any other social concerns that yoy can turn you attention too, as this is getting old. No one can even begin to reason with you, because you only see things in "black-n-white" and that is a shame :tear:
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Zaac- The fact is that your reputation is what it is, and that it is based on your own actions.

And i'm good with that. Jesus had the same problem for telling folks truth they didn't want to hear or deal with. And white people, particularly the ones who fancy themselves to be political conservatives, in this country don't want to honestly deal with race and how white people have historically and today treat Black and Brown people.

Call me a racist all you like, and I am confident that my reputation would not support the claim. I would assert that yours would not weather such scrutiny
.

Again, the supposition you put forth is just like the rigged system of which I speak. The folks who are rigging the system get together and say 'we're not racists. The guy who is calling us racist is'. Then you pat each other on the back and feel good about yourselves.

I get it.

Doesn't change your racial prejudices or the outright racism of some of ya. But don't ever think that I've got a problem with being called a racist for calling out the racism and racial prejudices on this board and throughout these United States of America.

Don't expect to see me shrink away from calling a spade a spade just because the resident bully pulpit thinks that banding together and declaring "we're not racist, you are race baiter". I'll continue to call it as I see it. And you and the 'brethren' will continue to deny it just like white Christians did during Jim Crow and slavery.

Come up with a new tactic.

This is all that I will say on the matter. You may have the last word.

You didn't have to say the previous words as you've said them before.
 

just-want-peace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Zaac, you made the comment way back to the effect that "whites" are running everything.
Well, my first thought was that the mayor of N.O. During Katrina was NOT a white; that was not a very good example of "black leadership"!!
 

Sapper Woody

Well-Known Member
And right here again is where you refuse to listen ironically. It's your reality that's been accepted during Jim Crow and now by the masses of folks who call themselves Christians. There will be and can be no meeting of the minds because, like you, the white people in the majority will continue to marginalize and dismiss anything that black people say because it's not YOUR reality.

They dismiss yours because YOURS isn't the truth that they are living day to day.
And theirs isn't the truth that I am living day to day. Don't you see, that you actually reinforced what I'm saying. If neither side is willing to listen to the other, there can be no reconciliation. And I'm saying I'm willing to listen. If the other side is willing to listen.


They dismiss yours because people who have said the same things as you have dismissed theirs for over 400 years in this country.
Which is amazing, seeing as this country is only 239 years old. Even if you go all the way back to the pilgrims, it's less than 400 years on this continent. Then add to the fact that slavery wasn't legal until 1643 (even though there were a few slaves earlier), then you only get oppression (assuming it still continues to this day, which I don't believe it does, but for the sake of this argument will allow the assumption) for 372 years on this continent.

I don't know how better to explain it to you. White people run everything in this country and always have.
The majority has run this country. And the majority is white. It's not surprising, and it means nothing. Until a minority becomes the majority, this will not change.

You want a meeting of the minds, for what?
So that a rational discussion can take place. As I've said before, but you dismiss, I am willing to listen, if the other side is. But since the other side is not, I have no choice but to NOT listen.

That's fine. But that is NOT how the exchange took place.

A more accurate display of the exchange was:

They told you what their experience is.
You dismissed it because your experience didn't show you any evidence that you believed "warranted' their reaction.
No, the evidence didn't show any evidence. So, rather than dismiss experience, I'm asking for a discussion in which we can compare experiences. But the reaction is, "No. No discussion. Acquiescence or nothing."

Right here is why you and those like you will never get anywhere with black people. You're dismissive of what they say and white folks have in large part been dismissive of what they say for 400 years in this country. But then you wonder why there can't be a meeting of the minds when you continue the same pattern of marginalization that's taken place in this country for 400 years.
Firstly, again, take a look at your numbers. Your claim is impossible. Second, I wasn't alive until the 80s. And even the oldest of blacks who remember segregation are dying off. The "voices" of the movement have no recollection of the injustices that blacks suffered years ago.

I'm going to take a break from the discussion here to say that I will readily admit that in the past blacks have been discriminated against, held back, etc. It was tragic, but it happened. But I refuse to feel ashamed for something I had no part in. I refuse to feel ashamed of being white. I am proud of my heritage (as should be everyone else).

You even went so far as to make it look as though I was aligning with them.
You defend them. You stand up for them. Whether you are a part of the group, you are aligned with them. You don't have to say something for it to be true. It's really simple. Just like your claim that you've never called anyone on this board racist. No, you've never said the words, but the clear implication was there.

I'll give you credit. You are very careful with your words. But you have to be. Your position(s) are wrong, and so you have to pick and choose your wording carefully so as not to leave the holes in your arguments exposed.

You're being dishonest. You dismissed what they said from the start because YOU haven't seen any evidence.
I'll be dead honest here. In the past I was completely dismissive of their experiences, because I didn't see the evidence. But, IN THIS THREAD, I have been open to discussion. And still am, if someone will discuss reasonably without dismissing me outright.

You haven't asked for an exchange of experiences.
What do you think I am doing? Right now, I am asking for an exchange of experiences. How can you say I haven't asked for an exchange. That's what I've been doing almost this whole thread.

The White privilege you displayed said to Blacks I'm gonna tell you what your experience is because you obviously don't know any better than to believe you're experiencing one thing when you're not.
You're opinion. It's wrong, but you're entitled to it. I haven't said that at all. To use your words, "I've never said that." In fact, I've said the opposite. I've said, "I'm willing to examine your experiences if you'll examine mine (ours)."

Your data is rigged. If the system is systemically racist and discriminatory towards Blacks in its practices, what is your data gonna show other than what the folks who rigged the system towards Blacks want it to show?
If we can't go to the data, and we can't go to experiences, then I guess nothing will ever change.

You should accept it in the same way that you started your dismissive approach to what they said as just an "ignorance of the facts".

You IMMEDIATELY dismissed and attempted to marginalize what they said, but now you wonder why what you said is summarily dismissed as irrelevant?
You did what white folks have been doing for 400 years and then tried to flip as though they were being dismissive of your experience when it is YOU who immediately dismissed theirs.
No, I dismissed the BLM movement's words. I did not dismiss black people's experiences. I dismissed the BLM movement's claims, which were obviously wrong.

Again, just stop. You were dismissive from the start so I don't see why you keep trying to make it look like you were open to a discussion of what they said when you IMMEDIATELY claimed they were malicious and perhaps just ignorant of the facts.
Look at that website. That website WAS malicious, and ignorant of the facts.

I HAD to be dismissive of the website in order to begin a rational discussion. To do so otherwise would be to ignore reason and logic. Now that I've established that the website from the founders is wrong, I turn to people in the movement (which I am trying to do off the board) to say, "Ok, so what do YOU think?"

The ONLY way to get a discussion going was to start at the beginning. There was a website by the founders that made some claims and demands. So I looked at that. It was wrong. So now I am going to the next step, and trying to get in touch with INDIVIDUALS to see what the prevailing opinion/experience is.

I am taking this a logical step by logical step. I have dismissed no experience from anyone who did not dismiss my viewpoint without listening to me. I dismissed the starting point, which caused me to dig deeper. There was no turn around, there was no waffling. I called out the site, and am now moving on to the next step.
 

Rippon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No, you choose to ignore the fact that not every white person is not a racist.
You meant, of course:"No, you choose to ignore the fact that not every white person is a racist."

You had loaded too many negatives in your sentence.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You meant, of course:"No, you choose to ignore the fact that not every white person is a racist."

You had loaded too many negatives in your sentence.

I am not like him. I don't never be loading to many negatives in none of my sentences.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
452.png
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
And theirs isn't the truth that I am living day to day. ...

you're not willing to listen. you dismissed them and what they said because you're not willing to listen. It's what white folks have been doing to black folks for 400 years.

One of the reasons the BLM movement developed is because like yourself, a lot of white people don't listen to what Blacks say, so they are making sure that you know that they believe Black Lives Matter TOO.


Which is amazing, seeing as this country is only 239 years old. Even if you go all the way back to the pilgrims, it's less than 400 years on this continent.

The first slaves arrived here in 1619. So there's just about 400 years.

Then add to the fact that slavery wasn't legal until 1643 (even though there were a few slaves earlier), t....

Well gosh. I guess they just shipped those slaves back because slavery was illegal.

The majority has run this country. And the majority is white. It's not surprising, and it means nothing. Until a minority becomes the majority, this will not change.

Sure it does. That's your white privilege talking if you think Whites being the majority in this country doesn't mean anything.

So that a rational discussion can take place.

Rational according to whom? You and the other dismissive folks rigging the system? They already know what you and the dismissive folks think. That's why there is a BLM movement.

As I've said before, but you dismiss, I am willing to listen, i...

And as I said before stop lying. Not two or three paragraphs into your OP you completely dismissed them and what they were saying. You're not trying to have a discussion. You're trying to run the narrative the way white folks have for nearly 400 years. And you want them to agree with your reality when your reality IS NOT their reality.

Not happening and there simply is no reason to talk to folks like you about it.

No, the evidence didn't show any evidence. So, rather than dismiss experience, I...

Again, no you're not. You're saying the evidence you have gathered doesn't show any evidence. they are saying the lives they live and have lived is the evidence that you and those like you keep rejecting in favor of what the police and the rigged system keep saying.

Praise God for video because it's starting to show that the evidence that you say isn't there, really is. But a lot of white people like you don't want to believe it.

Firstly, again, take a look at your numbers. Your claim is impossible.

Firstly, again, you don't know what you're talking about. There have been black slaves in this land we now call the United States since the early colonial period and before brought over by the Spanish and others.

Second, I wasn't alive until the 80s.

And you obviously didn't have any problem learning the ways of the dismissiveness and marginalization of white privilege.

And even the oldest of blacks who remember segregation are dying off. The "voices" of the movement have no recollection of the injustices that blacks suffered years ago.

You must have darn near lost your mind even writing that. How about you go tell the Jews that the voices have no recollection of the Holocaust and see what response you get.

I'm going to take a break from the discussion here to say that I will readily admit that in the past blacks have been discriminated against, held back, etc. It was tragic, but it happened. But I refuse to feel ashamed for something I had no part in. I refuse to feel ashamed of being white.

Nobody asked you to feel ashamed. It's been established by you and a lot of other white folks that white folks will continue to be dismissive of and marginalize the lives of Blacks. You are ( and your words in this thread testify) are ACTIVELY, TODAY taking full part in THAT.
I am proud of my heritage (as should be everyone else).

If you believe that, based upon your comments, you only seem to believe that for white folks otherwise you wouldn't have a problem with folks saying Black Lives Matter.

You defend them. You stand up for them.

Where have I defended them? Where have I stood up for them? Even if I had, it would be irrelevant.I was simply trying to explain to you what they were saying. But like white people tend to do whenever they think a group of black people is speaking against them and what they have done or are doing, you got a chip on your shoulder about the group.

Whether you are a part of the group, you are aligned with them. You don't have to say something for it to be true. It's really simple. Just like your claim that you've never called anyone on this board racist. No, you've never said the words, but the clear implication was there.

You can claim I'm aligned with the "group" all you want and it won't make it true. Are you aligned with the KKK or the Aryan Brotherhood or perhaps the Skinheads? Your words would lead some to think that you might share the same philosophies as those groups. The clear implication is there.

I'll give you credit. You are very careful with your words. But you have to be. Your position(s) are wrong, and so you have to pick and choose your wording carefully so as not to leave the holes in your arguments exposed.

I'm very careful with my words because unlike a lot of folks, I know what the words mean. You and a lot of others are just upset that you have to try so hard to find holes so that you can make the truth look untrue. Too funny. :laugh:

I'll be dead honest here. In the past I was completely dismissive of their experiences, because I didn't see the evidence. But, IN THIS THREAD, I have been open to discussion. And still am, if someone will discuss reasonably without dismissing me outright.

And you insist on continuing to tell this lie. How are you gonna dismiss what they say and then say you're open to discussion? Stop giving lip service to being open minded when you've made clear that you're not. It's as though you're trying to curry some sort of "I'm taking the high road" position for the folks reading because you know the majority of them will fall for it and act as though you hadn't already set yourself up to dismiss what the BLM folks were saying.

So save that foolishness for the folks on here who are gonna fall for it. I CAN read and saw exactly what you did. And if you think that's a demonstration of being open to discussion, you continue to be part of the problem as to why there won't be any discussion.

What do you think I am doing? Right now, I am asking for an exchange of experiences. How can you say I haven't asked for an exchange. That's what I've been doing almost this whole thread.

How are you asking for an exchange of experiences if you've already said
Sapper said:
This could, in all honesty, just be an ignorance of the facts. Looking at the numbers, there is NOT a "systemic pattern of anti-black law enforcement violence".

You've ALREADY dismissed their experiences. So what's the purpose in them attempting to have an exchange of experiences with someone who has already dismissed their experiences as ignorance of the facts?


So again, stop pretending when your words make clear that what you now say you're doing is NOT the case.

You're opinion. It's wrong, but you're entitled to it. .
"

It wasn't opinion. It was quite factual.
I haven't said that at all. To use your words, "I've never said that." In fact, I've said the opposite. I've said, "I'm willing to examine your experiences if you'll examine mine (ours)
Oh you said it. You and some other white people are just so used to saying stuff like you said that you don't even realize what you did. That's why it's SYSTEMIC.

You were dismissive and don't even realize it. But then you wonder why there is no discussion. Why would there be a discussion when, like you, white people have been dismissive of what Blacks have said or experienced for nearly 400 years? And then turn around and try to claim to be open to discussion as though the black people don't have sense enough to see what you did.
If we can't go to the data, and we can't go to experiences, then I guess nothing will ever change.

You go to the data, because you're white and you trust the white people who are rigging the system.

You won't go to the experiences because the experiences go against your data.

So you're right. Nothing will ever change. And black people will continue to express that their lives matter, and white folks like yourself will continue to dismissively reply that all lives matter.



(con't)
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
No, I dismissed the BLM movement's words. I did not dismiss black people's experiences. I dismissed the BLM movement's claims, which were obviously wrong.

Backpedaling is not allowed. You said perhaps they were just ignorant of the facts. Where do you surmise they are getting their facts about how Blacks are being treated?

They certainly don't have to see it on FOX news to know that police have been murdering, brutalizing, and incarcerating black people at a rate many times that of their white counterparts.

Look at that website. That website WAS malicious, and ignorant of the facts.

Website's aren't malicious. People are. And I ask again, how do you get to deem that these people who are the ones with the experiences are ignorant of the facts?

Could it just possibly be that the numbers gathered by the folks who rig the system don't reflect the reality of what is actually happening in the black community? Could it possibly be that those numbers that you're using to judge them ignorant of the facts, don't reflect the facts?

I HAD to be dismissive of the website in order to begin a rational discussion.

Nope. Again, this is the same thing that a lot of white people often do with anything run by Blacks. You had to be dismissive of the website and what they were saying in order to make your point about not supporting them. If you were really interested in starting a discussion with them or anyone else, that was NOT the way to go about it.

At least you acknowledged you WERE being dismissive.

To do so otherwise would be to ignore reason and logic. Now that I've established that the website from the founders is wrong, I turn to people in the movement (which I am trying to do off the board) to say, "Ok, so what do YOU think?"

So you weren't looking to understand what they had written as I tried to explain it to you. You were looking to expound upon why you could not support them. hen that's what you should have said instead of being dismissive.

The ONLY way to get a discussion going was to start at the beginning. There was a website by the founders that made some claims and demands. So I looked at that. It was wrong.

To get a discussion going with whom? There are no BLM founders on here. And again, it being wrong is YOUR opinion that's only true if you reject their experiences which you summarily did.

So now I am going to the next step, and trying to get in touch with INDIVIDUALS to see what the prevailing opinion/experience is.

Except you don't care because right at the beginning you told us what you think.

I am taking this a logical step by logical step. I have dismissed no experience from anyone who did not dismiss my viewpoint without listening to me.

You dismissed their experience barely half way into your OP. The post IS still up.

I dismissed the starting point, which caused me to dig deeper.

The starting point is THEIR experiences that you dismissed as being indicative of anti-Black law enforcement violence.


There was no turn around, there was no waffling. I called out the site, and am now moving on to the next step.

You dismissed their experiences and then pretended to want to talk. About what???
 

Rolfe

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You meant, of course:"No, you choose to ignore the fact that not every white person is a racist."

You had loaded too many negatives in your sentence.

You are right to correct me. Missed that one. Thanks. :)
 

Sapper Woody

Well-Known Member
Ok, Zaac, I feel there is a talking past each other here. Let's start over, and I'll attempt to explain my current position in a more accurate wording.

Hearing about the Black Lives Matter, but realizing that I've never really looked into what the movement stood for, I decided to look for answers and see what the movement is really about. I did a google search. I came upon the founder's website.

After looking at the website, I realized that the founders of the movement were people, who at the least, were ignorant. They either did not care to use accurate statements, or did not bother to check up on them. (If they got their numbers from a different source, I'd like to examine that source. But they gave no sources. In the absence of given sources, I had to do my own searching.) They were more concerned about the queer black woman's rights than black rights as a whole.

So, I dismissed the website.

After dismissing the website, I decided to look into the matter further.

This is where I am right now. I want to find out what the average black person is thinking in terms of equality and oppression. I don't care about what some website that caters to queers says. I want to find out what individuals think, what they feel, and why they think/feel that way.

The worst that can happen is that I disagree. That's the absolute worst case scenario.

I don't want someone ranting, I want someone talking. Don't try and tell me that "black people face this on a daily basis." I want to hear, "Here's what I faced." I don't want, "black people don't get the opportunities white people do." I want, "Here's the opportunity I didn't get because I am black."

If people are facing this on a daily basis, it shouldn't be hard to find. But I am having a hard time finding it. It's natural to be skeptical of someone claiming "black people face it all the time", and then when you ask, "give me an example", the response is, "it happens all the time."

All I can get is answers that talk about the collective, not the individual.

Now, while I know that one person does not represent the collective as a whole, my first outreach into finding out what black people go through was tonight to a young man attending the college here.

He talked to me in confidence, and so I won't share his story. But, basically, his response was, "Before I got saved, I was the worst. I believed that the white man was responsible for all the wrongs in my life. Then I met Jesus four years ago, and I realized that He was the answer. Since that time, I've not felt like the white man has held me down at all."

Again, I know that one person does not a pattern make. But I can't help but wonder how many others there are like him out there, who simply need to hear the Gospel. In this one person's life, his outlook completely changed since he got saved.

I can't solve America's woes. I can't reconcile the black versus white mentality. But what I can do it give the gospel. I can share the good news to all (black, white, whatever), and try to change lives that way.

Back to the subject at hand, I am currently in a state where I wish to invite dialogue. I want someone to give me their personal testimony of how the white man held them back. I want someone to give me a first hand account of how they were discriminated against. Not in the 60s. I know that. Today. In the 2000s.

The abolishment of slavery was the beginning. MLK and Rosa Parks ignited a movement. Today, the same thing is being attempted. But, to what end? In order for me, as a white man, to possibly understand what the black population wants, and in order to form a reconciliation, I need to hear what is going on. I need actual experiences, not "it happens all the time".

Black people have the right to vote. They have the right to free speech. They have all the same legal rights I have, as a white man. If they are being discriminated against, I need something concrete. I can't back a movement that just simply says, "this is the way we see it." I need, "This is why we see it that way."

Edited to add: I am trying to have a serious discussion. I would appreciate all the de-railing threads concerning grammar, or trying to be humorous to stop.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top