I am not discrediting the accomplishments of our forces, but whenever I read someone writing only about America defeating the Nazis I know that that person has not really read any good history book on the subject. Our forces had 135,576 military deaths in Europe compared to 8.7 million Russian military deaths. So, they did more of the fighting there - and certainly most of the dying.
I’m not saying Russia didn’t help defeat the Nazis, but high death statistics don’t equal more effort. It could be that communism uses life as a commodity and found that they had too many people and not enough potatoes.
It sounds like oversimplifying but that is communism in short. When you are not productive you are expendable.
There is a reason why people can name American generals , British generals,Japanese generals, and German generals from WWII. The number of people who can name a brilliant military leader from Russia or Italy has more to do with the lack of significant accomplishments. Russias best ally was winter. Winter did more for Russia than any of her generals.
In part, the same can be said of other nations in WWII. Some nations may not have had the same opportunities to display their military leadership because of their outdated equipment. This doesn’t mean that they didn’t have good intentions. It means the leadership, whether military or civilian, dictatorial or democratic, didn’t have the ability to direct their own resources in a manner that would bring significant recognition to their own countries military.
None of this means that lives were less valuable individually. It can mean that some countries ascribed less value to individuals.
That is what communism does. When you are too sick, you’re left to die. Too old? Who cares about you? If times are bad enough, you might not even rate the expense of a more humane execution by lethal injection.
Executed? Yes. Why, what crime? You got old and useless to society.