• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Breaking news...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Drudge is now reporting that Sarah Palin has announced that she will resign as governor of Alaska, effective July 24. Some are speculating that this is in order to focus on a run for the White House.


Liberals are scared to death of her and it is sending their visceral hatred through the ceiling.
 

KenH

Well-Known Member
Liberals are scared to death of her and it is sending their visceral hatred through the ceiling.

So all of this vitriol directed toward President Obama by conservatives must mean, according to your reasoning, that conservatives are scared to to death that he has what it takes to be a very, very successful president.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So all of this vitriol directed toward President Obama by conservatives must mean, according to your reasoning, that conservatives are scared to to death that he has what it takes to be a very, very successful president.


Actually it means we are concerned that he will further dismantle the constitution and the economy. Bush did enough of that in his second term with corporate take overs and entitlement programs. His marxist policies should be a concern for all of us. And by the way everyone can see the original post. Hacking up a quote from me and trying to rearrange the context is silly.
 

KenH

Well-Known Member
Actually it means we are concerned that he will further dismantle the constitution and the economy.

Then, according to your own reasoning, those of us opposed to Sarah Palin are concerned that she will dismantle the Bill of Rights and impose beggar thy neighbor, race to the bottom economic policies.

And, by the way, looking at your avatar, our Founding Fathers were mostly libertarians, not right-wingers.
 

Pastor Larry

<b>Moderator</b>
Site Supporter
1) No, you are quite wrong.
Factually incorrect.

2) And you are?
Yes, I am objective about your posting.

3) Then, with all due respect, you shouldn't be posting in this thread.
So not only are you posting when you said you wouldn't. Now you are telling others when they can post. You really have some chutzpah, Ken.

4) Yes, you did.
No I didn't. If you knew what a personal attack was, you would know very well that I didn't make a personal attack against you. I made a statement reasonably grounded in experience that had nothing to do with you as a person. It, by definition, was not a personal attack.

Seriously, Ken, why do you break your word so easily? Just answer that.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Then, according to your own reasoning, those of us opposed to Sarah Palin are concerned that she will dismantle the Bill of Rights and impose beggar thy neighbor, race to the bottom economic policies.


Think before you post.
 

KenH

Well-Known Member
1) Factually incorrect.

2) Yes, I am objective about your posting.

3) No I didn't.

1) No, factually correct.

2) That's the best laugh I've had so far today, Pastor Larry. Thanks. :laugh:

3) Yes, you did. Just buck up and admit it.
 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Actually it means we are concerned that he will further dismantle the constitution and the economy. Bush did enough of that in his second term with corporate take overs and entitlement programs. His marxist policies should be a concern for all of us. And by the way everyone can see the original post. Hacking up a quote from me and trying to rearrange the context is silly.

Have you ever read Marx?

Go to: http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/61
 

Pastor Larry

<b>Moderator</b>
Site Supporter
1) No, factually correct.
This shows that you are not objective about your own posting.

2) That's the best laugh I've had so far today, Pastor Larry. Thanks.
Your welcome. Life is easier when you accept the truth. I am not entirely objective about my own posts, but I am generally about others. In this case, were you to ask if I were objective about my own posts, I would say, "No." But the question was about objectivity about your posts. You are not objective about them. You have too much invested in them,

3) Yes, you did. Just buck up and admit it.
No I didn't. I have demonstrated that several different ways. And the fact that you still don't get it proves my point. You won't win by defending yourself.

But I noticed you didn't answer the question: Why do you break your word so easily? Doesn't that bother you?
 

ccrobinson

Active Member
KenH said:
I am quite consistent.

Indeed, somebody who continues to post about politics after stating, on multiple occasions, that they weren't going to post about politics anymore is certainly the model of consistency. :rolleyes:


KenH said:
I abhor bad behavior on the part of any person, regardless of political views or lack thereof.

Maybe you really do, but it's funny how I don't see you criticizing Democrats when they do the same things that Republicans do.


JohnDeereFan said:
Calm down. It was just a joke.

And just where is the smiley that lets me know you were joking? :wavey:
 

KenH

Well-Known Member
I can't wait until she declares wolf hunting season!!!

Fortunately, she won't be in a position of power to do that.
woohoo.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top