Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Jerome said:from I Samuel 1
But Hannah went not up; for she said unto her husband, I will not go up until the child be weaned
Only speaking for myself, but it's done so discreetly that everyone around me thought I was holding a sleeping baby.Carolina Baptist said:Just a question. Is it done discretely enough to keep a teenage boy's imagination from stumbling?
Spinach said:There is no "need" to do it in public. I don't understand the "need" to do it in private. A baby is eating. It's not shameful.
It's an art, I tell ya. LOL!blackbird said:My wife breast fed both of ours-----when she fed in church, I promise you-----an FBI investigator wouldn't have been able to detect WHEN she was doing it---she always sat on the 2nd row and all eyes COULD have seen---but it was so descreet no one----no one---repeat----no one ever saw it!!
IF they DID happen to see and were offended------no one was MAN or WOMAN enough to complain about it to me or to her
How do you know this?My wife breast fed both of ours-----when she fed in church, I promise you-----an FBI investigator wouldn't have been able to detect WHEN she was doing it---she always sat on the 2nd row and all eyes COULD have seen---but it was so descreet no one----no one---repeat----no one ever saw it!!
Not to be rude, and I sincerely hope you understand that, but how long were your services? I can't imagine that out of a full day even with six or eight feeding that an hour or hour and a half service is the only time that a baby can eat. That strikes me as odd.As a mom of 5, all close in age, I would have spent 7 years straight in the nursery. I also would have missed much of our deputation.
It might, but that's not really my issue. To me the issue is appropriateness. If you were on a long flight, then by all means, have at it. I am not offended by it. I just don't see the need for it.Even if a woman did have her baby covered with a blanket and everyone "knew" what she was doing, what exactly is the problem? Does "knowing" cause imaginations? Does seeing a woman's pregnant belly, clothed, cause imaginations as well?
As do I. As I analyze it, I just find myself wondering why it is necessary. It seems to me to be unnecessary and sufficiently questionable to avoid it particularly when there are better options.If someone had a problem with a woman nursing her baby, discreetly, in public, I think that person should analyze why, imo.
Carolina Baptist said:Just a question. Is it done discretely enough to keep a teenage boy's imagination from stumbling?
Spinach said:It's an art, I tell ya. LOL!