Bush: Never Wudda Happened on HIs Watch!

[righteousdude2]

Now that is one BIG Oxymoron...

What the Obama administration does will depend on the information given to him by the intelligence services.

"intelligence services" :laugh::laugh::laugh:

 

[General Mung Beans]

....and after that attack, with a higher level of potential attacks being possible, Bush held the fort quite admirably. :thumbs:

And Obama "held the fort" for another four years. The fact is that the number of terrorist attacks in the United States have been declining for the last several decades including under both Bush and Obama.

This prez cares more about spending money we don't have.

The deficit is stablizing over the short term. Long-term obviously entitlements will cause a problem but right now getting people back to work should be the priority.

Eliminating the middle class.

How so?

Gutting and cutting the military.

You need to cut military spending if you're serious about reducing deficits. And we're hardly "gutting" the military.

Pulling military out of places we should stay in order to show strength.

Where would those countries be?

Enabling the entitled.

?

Supporting gay marriage.

Unfortunate perhaps, but then few Republicans want to abolish no-fault divorce laws either which is the main enemy of traditional marriage in these United States not gay marriage.

Legalizing millions of undeserving illegals.

Just like Reagan.

Giving health insurance to a group of people that could care less. [/QUOTE}

?

Taking guns out of the hands of good Americans.

Just like Reagan again who supported the Brady Bill. An assault weapons ban is politically impossible while an expanded background checks used to be supported even by the NRA.

Killing UNBORN babies in abortion mills.

I'm pro-life actually and deplore Obama's pro-abortion legalization stance but

Bowing to the threats of twerp of a leader in North Korea trying to make a name for himself.

President Obama has continued to refuse to accept a nuclear North Korea and pushed through new sanctions while ordering new missile defence systems deployed.

Freezing out nations that have care little about "Human rights" while kissing the ring of the Chinese in order to keep the credit card limits high!

Most of the borrowing comes from within the United States.

Oh, and taking vacations every other week. Then we has a growing nation that is moving into the realm of a socialistic county, and less like the democratically free, capitalistic nation it once was. :tear:

Would you have said the same thing eight years ago when President Bush was on vacation during Hurricane Katrina. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-20093801.html

Oh, and I forgot....he is doing his best to sweep the Benghazi incident under the carpet of the Oval office. :tear:

If I left anything out, I am sorry.

Take a bow Mr. President...you deserve the applause; after all this is the America you have created after five years of socialistic ideas.

Obama's policies are not socialist, or even Keynesianism. They are far more free-market than FDR or even Richard Nixon's policies.

And to answer your question, before you hit me with it. Yes I'm mad. I'm disgusted with the continual downward spiral of this once great nation into a sea of mediocrity! And having to sit by and listen to the liberal news media shower this administration with praise, and hearing this administration blow its horn of self accomplishments. :applause:

No offence but I sometimes wonder if we are talking about the same President here.

This is the President who has aggressively used drone strikes to kill hundreds of terrorists. This is the same President who passed health care reform legislation that was largely based on Republican ideas, and is to the right of President Nixon's UHC plan 40 years ago. This is the same President who has offered compromise after compromise for the Republicans on entitlements which his party values incredibly strongly.

Seriously? You don't think he's hoping for more and bigger attacks?

No I do not.

"intelligence services" :

What's the sarcasm for? Do you believe our intelligence services are a joke?

 

[Revmitchell]

What the Obama administration does will depend on the information given to him by the intelligence services.

No what the President does depends on how bad he needs to cover his backside. Which is why he was in a hurry to give him is miranda rights.

 

[righteousdude2]

Yes...Don't you?

You asked >What's the sarcasm for? Do you believe our intelligence services are a joke?<

It looks as though - and it looks like time will show this to be a fact - that the FBI and others did a smash-bang job of following up on the concerns of Russia about the older brother.

Yes I am being sarcastic.

And as far as Obama needing to cut back on military, let me ask why he has NOT yet cut back on the money he and his family spend on jetting across the country and around the world.

If large corporations can utilize cyber generated meetings, why can't the government get with the new age, use cyber meeting techniques, and save us all the money it costs to fly around the world?

Sure, some meeting, for the purpose of security need to be face-to-face. But, generally, the president could use Skype to talk with leaders around the world.

Do you realize how much oil, manpower and money we'd save with Skype generated meetings? There are programs like "gotomeeting," "cvent" and "imeet" to name a few. And it wouldn't take much for technology to devise a security proof cyber meeting program that could be used to help nations save tons of money and be "Green" while doing it. :wavey: