1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Bush on the Constitution: 'It's just a [edited] piece of paper'

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by poncho, Dec 13, 2005.

Top Posters
Page 3 of 4
  1. prophecynut

    prophecynut New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,263
    Likes Received:
    0
    The American people should have the right to known the true number of casualties, the number reported by the DOD is a lie, military personnel who have died en route to Germany or in German hospitals are not listed in the official death toll."

    We have a bunch of pathological liars in high places of government.

    http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a1669.htm
     
    #41 prophecynut, Dec 14, 2005
  2. StefanM

    StefanM Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    7,333
    Likes Received:
    210
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The title of this thread makes me laugh. After all the Constitution is an "edited" piece of paper. Edited 27 times that is!
     
    #42 StefanM, Dec 14, 2005
  3. Daisy

    Daisy New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    Used to impress the gullible and intimidate the paranoid - unless some group actually did appoint you their spokesman.

    We think it's silly to use "we" to give your own opinion extra weight. [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
    #43 Daisy, Dec 14, 2005
  4. prophecynut

    prophecynut New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,263
    Likes Received:
    0
    #44 prophecynut, Dec 14, 2005
  5. hillclimber

    hillclimber New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Messages:
    2,075
    Likes Received:
    0
    I subscribed to Pastor Baldwin's web site until I realized I did not agree with nearly enough of his theology. It took me about a full month to get off his email list. I was really angry, and almost cussed in email pleas. It took an effort like replying something about saying "wagonwheel" while standing on your head on June 4th at 4:27 AM to get taken off his list.

    I don't believe a word of these accusations against President Bush, and the capitolhillblue thing looks like a liberal bunch trying to look neutral or moderate.
     
    #45 hillclimber, Dec 14, 2005
  6. rsr

    rsr <b> 7,000 posts club</b>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    11,864
    Likes Received:
    1,098
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Well, yeah, many of them. I don't know of any that I trust implicitly. (Walter Williams probably comes the closest, but when he advocates civil war I just have to ignore him.) Coulter is a slash-and-burn polemicist and Malkin is just embarrassing. I still don't know why I should pay attention to Limbuagh except that he's Rush's brother.
     
    #46 rsr, Dec 14, 2005
  7. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Well, I guess you've proved your point if the point is that you can answer your own questions. Bravo. [​IMG] [​IMG]

    And I don't buy the coincidence theories that you do. You'd think (well I would anyways) after awhile they'd get tired of using the same old plays from the same old playbooks. Like "OOOPS! We goofed, we need more money and more power quick", but I suppose if those old plays keep working for you (the people keep buying it) only a fool would abandon them.

    Either we got some incredibly inept folks running things or there is a conspiracy. Personally I can't see how Harvard and Yale trained brains can be so stupid to keep making "mistakes" and being rewarded for it with ever increasing power and funding without noticing all the benefits those mistakes grant them.

    That's no theory that's history. [​IMG]

    [ December 14, 2005, 11:32 PM: Message edited by: poncho ]
     
    #47 poncho, Dec 14, 2005
  8. Terry_Herrington

    Terry_Herrington New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    4,455
    Likes Received:
    1
    Yea Poncho, only real war heros like emeraldctyangel are allowed to comment on things pertaining to freedom. :rolleyes:
     
    #48 Terry_Herrington, Dec 15, 2005
  9. Pastor Larry

    Pastor Larry <b>Moderator</b>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    ACtually, it is common use of "we" in writing and speaking. It has nothing to do with impressing or intimidating. It is a common figure of speech in writing and speaking.

    Furthermore, look at what I actually said: I said "we have seen something." We have all seen it, even you, though you may not have recognized it for one reason or another. So when I said "we have seen it," I was in fact correct, even with those who disagree with me.

    That's fine. But given your complaints about the use of "we," you seem decidedly inconsistent to use it here. I assume you are being light hearted here because I don't think you would do the thing you complain about. But maybe you are inconsistent.

    But I would point out that you were wrong about my reasons. I didn't do it to give my opinion extra weight. I too think it is silly to use "we" to give an opinion extra weight. So at least we agree on that ... [​IMG] ...

    Hope your day is great for you.
     
    #49 Pastor Larry, Dec 15, 2005
  10. Rocko9

    Rocko9 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,621
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yea Poncho, only real war heros like emeraldctyangel are allowed to comment on things pertaining to freedom. :rolleyes: </font>[/QUOTE]Terry, when was the last time that we have had a terrorist attack in Hawaii----not since Pearl Harbor,right? So this must be because Emeraldcityangel is being so ever vigilant in keeping the terrorist out of Hawaii ;)
     
    #50 Rocko9, Dec 15, 2005
  11. Pastor Larry

    Pastor Larry <b>Moderator</b>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nope, it's the Patriot Act :D
     
    #51 Pastor Larry, Dec 15, 2005
  12. NiteShift

    NiteShift New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wow. That is quite a burden you carry around, being the only ones who can see the truth. A conspiracy under every rug and in every closet. Boy am I glad I'm part of that great, mindless herd and don't have to trouble myself with all that!
     
    #52 NiteShift, Dec 15, 2005
  13. Rocko9

    Rocko9 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,621
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nope, it's the Patriot Act :D </font>[/QUOTE]I don't think that this is acting, if it is then emeraldcityangel deserves an Oscar. ;)
     
    #53 Rocko9, Dec 15, 2005
  14. prophecynut

    prophecynut New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,263
    Likes Received:
    0
    NightShift
    What you don't know won't hurt you until it happens, by that time its too late to do anything about it.

    Although Poncho heads the pack, there's Lady Eagle and others who share our views.
     
    #54 prophecynut, Dec 15, 2005
  15. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Nope, it's the Patriot Act :D </font>[/QUOTE]I don't think that this is acting, if it is then emeraldcityangel deserves an Oscar. ;) </font>[/QUOTE][​IMG] [​IMG]
     
    #55 poncho, Dec 15, 2005
  16. emeraldctyangel

    emeraldctyangel New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    737
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yea Poncho, only real war heros like emeraldctyangel are allowed to comment on things pertaining to freedom. :rolleyes: </font>[/QUOTE]Terry, when was the last time that we have had a terrorist attack in Hawaii----not since Pearl Harbor,right? So this must be because Emeraldcityangel is being so ever vigilant in keeping the terrorist out of Hawaii ;) </font>[/QUOTE]That probably would mean to people with common sense that we are doing our jobs out here. Figures rock.

    Memo to you: just because US military are stationed in Hawaii or Nebraska or wherever, does not mean we stay there, um its called DEPLOYMENT? Maybe youve heard of it?

    Gosh you could win the entire jeapordy category entitled 'I know nothing about the military but will continue to comment regardless" yourself. Sigh - typical.

    And to whomever it was that posted the comment about the title of this post - couldnt agree more!

    poncho...standby for the rights report: INTACT. [​IMG]

    Capitolhillblue: still silly. [​IMG]
     
    #56 emeraldctyangel, Dec 17, 2005
  17. emeraldctyangel

    emeraldctyangel New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    737
    Likes Received:
    0
    Were you looking to start your own political based religion? strange.
     
    #57 emeraldctyangel, Dec 17, 2005
  18. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    The rights reports brought to you by the globalist owned television theater. [​IMG]
     
    #58 poncho, Dec 17, 2005
  19. prophecynut

    prophecynut New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,263
    Likes Received:
    0
    Never would do it because:

    "No one serving as a soldier gets involved in civilian affairs - he wants to please his commanding officer." 2 Tim. 2:4
     
    #59 prophecynut, Dec 17, 2005
  20. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Too bad the commander in chief's loyalty is to the organized money powers instead of the American people, PN. The top of the chain of command is the bankers and their corporate minions, not George Bush or John Kerry.
     
    #60 poncho, Dec 17, 2005
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 3 of 4
Loading...