Business Meeting

Phillip: //One of the members of that church, who is a salesman, who used
to work at one of those little "rip-off" finance companies and
the pastor worked out the salary increase to hide it down in his expenses.//

What is with the 'hide'?

I've been in the same church for 2005-1973=32 years.
I'm on our 5th pastor. We tell him how much we are
going to pay him, let him figure out how he will get it.
One big expense was (he is on Medicare now) Health
Insurance - 22% of his compensation package.
(our secetrary used to have insurance for her 60ish
husband - a full ½ of her take-home-pay )

We do try to give a slight increase each
year - aging doesn't get any cheaper

 

Quote: "The pastor kept saying that he was amazed that nobody complained about the budget when it was voted in. I told him that there were very few people in the meeting and they were the older folks that don't gripe about anything."

If I'm reading what your saying, the people that are now complaining did not bother to show up to vote on the budget. If that's true, they are wrong, are causing division in the church, and need to repent immediately and then hush.

 

As for percentages of the staff raises---here's the "skinny" on what we did--I as Pastor

Custodial workers raise of 6%


Salaried Youth minister raise of 5%(and believe me--he deserves every dime--the dude is "the bomb" and loves the Lord Jesus Christ!!)

Myself--as Pastor---a raise of 3%

My 3% was worth "way more" than the custodian's 6%

But I tell ya what "gets my goat"---its these lazy Baptists who won't come to business meeting to discuss and vote any raises----but when its all over---they gripe and fuss and belly ache and yak-yak and bak-bak over who got what and what was fair and how come this and how come that and why this and why that!! I wouldn't give you a Lincoln penny for a lazy baptist---and its almost Christmas!!!!!

 

I am of a pastor.

IF the people didn't show up to the business meeting to discuss and vote, then they have no reason to complain.

IF the pastor needs a higher raise then anyone else to have respect, then he has bigger problems then people not showing up at a business meeting.

With respect to the expenses, that is a common way to divide up a pastoral salary. I wouldn't worry about that.

However, to give everyone the same percentage raise is unnecessary and perhaps unwise. Pay people according to their work in the church.

 

People will always complain. Spurgeon says in one of his books that the church should take the pay of the ten highest paid deacons and average that and pay the pastor that amount.

If people in the church complains about a pastor's salary after the fact then they should either get to work or leave.

When I worked as a manager in a very large business I received as much as a 60% pay increase in one year by the company. I also worked hard to bring in business and showed it in their profit and sales. The lowest raise I received was in a church where the nickels and noses increased by 2.4 times in a little over one year. They had never had much money and once they saw more they started saving for a rainy day. They became greedy. Their greed came back to haunt them though. All they had except $3,000 was gone in one swoop because of a bad investment. Earlier I had advised them against and they went against me. So the amount they had saved for a rainy day was gone. Eventually some of the people began to complain in the church thinking that since the nickels and noses had increased so much that they should have given me more of a pay raise. So that caused problems too.

The amount with which you are generous will come back to you.

Prov. 11:25, "The generous man will be prosperous, And he who waters will himself be watered."

 

I would say pay people according to what they have accomplished not just how hard they worked. Some people work very hard and do not accomplish as much as others who are more efficient and have better training.

 

I agree with Pastor Larry.

 

I have found if you question anything, especially finances you have a "suspicious nature and a rebellious spirit".

 

But some people have ministries where the work is paid off in easily seen fruit, and others not so much. IT is not always about efficiency and better training.

 

Depends on the timing of your question. If your question comes after the fact, and you didn't participate in the budgeting process, then yes, you are showing a rebellious spirit. If not rebellious, then at least a divisive spirit.

 

If you have questions come to the business mtg and ask them.

The ones that are problems are those who complain and criticize but do not take the time to come to the meeting to share their views.

 

No not at all. I think questions and healthy debate about things can be very good for a church. It helps keep things in balance.

I do know pastors who cannot stand questions of any kind in a business meeting. For whatever reason they take it as a personal attack on their leadership. I think it is just an inflated ego.

 

In our church the Business Meeting moderator
is elected from non-Staff members. Also
the recorder (so can't be the Secretary).

This has worked well for 12 years. We started
it with the last pastor, but this pastor
likes to sit in the audence and bring
forth the questions.

 

Here's my massive 2.5 years of experience on this matter:

In the past, I would get offended, too...because I thought that I've spent much more time on this issue, and my life is invested in this work - while they invest approximately 3-5 hours a week...why can't they see that I'm right?

Some of the time, I have been right...but maybe not all the time. I have since learned (again) that we must consider all viewpoints, and not immediatly jump to conclusion that members who voice their opinions are simply following their carnal nature!

 

Members should ask questions a discuss the decisions being made in a business meeting. If I am to vote either for or against something then I should be informed on the subject. If I am only to vote the way the pastor tells me to vote then my vote means nothing.

Sometimes discussion can lead to something better coming along. At our last business meeting it was brought up that the church needed a new copy machine and one of the deacons had a couple of prices of new machines. I asked one simple question "Has anyone checked into leasing a machine vs. buying one?" No one had and when the Deacons checked it out they found we could lease a new machine with a maintenance contract for about $60 a month less than the cost of the maintenance contract on the old unit. Then at the end of the three year lease we could buy the machine for $1, and we had no large outlay of money for a new copier right now.

Without the discussion would have spent a couple of grand on a copier and still have had to pay a maintenance contract. Discussion can be good as long as it is intended to be discussion. If your point is simply to be right then you are better being quiet.

Bill

 

Been there, done that. The catch is of course, that at the end of three years the machine is so worn, used and outdated that it is probably worthless anyway.

Good point anyway.

We have pre-meetings to keep discussion to a minimum during these general church business meetings.
Anyone interested can attend, comment.
Hopefully by the time of the business meeting, a consensus of opinion has been achieved so the meeting will go smoothly and without rancor.

Rob

 

I came from a Southern Baptist background where you usually had more members show up for business meetings than you did for worship services. People would argue for hours about the color of the carpet, or whether to pad the pews, or whether the ice machine should deliver crushed or cubed ice.

Fortunately I now belong to a church where we only vote on three things: The hiring of a pastor, the dismissal of a pastor, and the annual budget. Our elders make all the other decisions, and I agree with this form of government. Anytime you make your people vote, you're dividing the church. Sometimes you're on the winning side, sometimes you're on the losing side; and if you stay there long enough, everyone will end up a loser. Voting is an American concept, not a biblical one. It's not found at all in the scriptures; in fact, dice were thrown to decide who would replace Judas.

As to a pastor's salary, and I can say this because I've been part of the pulpit committee, the finance committee, and an elder and deacon in my church. You can't equate what you earn or what the median church member earns to what your pastor earns. Most pastors have a college education. Most pastors tithe. Most pastors are on call 24 hours a day. You don't just hire a pastor, you hire his wife and family. A pastor's wife is expected to look and act a certain way. All the whining and complaining doesn't just get dumped on the pastor, it gets dumped on the wife and kids as well. Most pastors are required to do things above and beyond what Christ has called them to do: visit the sick, perform weddings, funerals, etc. The purpose of a pastor is to equip the congregation for their own ministry - not to do it for them.

And I suppose the most wrong attitude about paying a pastor is the attitude that your tithe actually belongs to you to begin with. God demands the first fruits and He has purposed those tithes so that there will be food in His house. What kind of food do you get in church? Spiritual. This means that it is God's intention that the tithes are to support His ministers and to care for the poor and widows (elderly).

In biblical times, people brought their tithes to the temple. These tithes were for the priests who were not given land when Israel moved into the promised land. The temples were built from offerings, not from tithes. And if you read the description of Solomon's temple, you'll see that it would have cost hundreds of millions in today's dollars - so God's people gave more in offerings than they paid in tithes. And they did this because they loved the Lord and wanted to honor Him. But if you look at how we 'do church' today, you'll find the building fund coming out of the regular tithes...which is necessary because only 20 percent of Christians are tithing anyway. If everyone did what God demanded, there shouldn't be anyone in our communities who are going without food, clothing and shelter. God doesn't need impressive structures today because His Spirit lives within all of His children.

The world should be coming to the Church instead of the government to have their needs met, but the modern church has adopted a worldy viewpoint and we're too busy worrying about how what isn't even our's is spent. If you've got to control how your tithe is spent, you might as well have kept it, because you haven't released it spiritually and God can't bless what you won't let go of.