KenH
Well-Known Member
"In September 2014 California became the first US state to ban plastic grocery bags, kicking off a national trend.
...
Though the law was sold as a “win-win for the environment” by lawmakers, a decade later it’s clear the bill was no such thing, something California lawmakers today concede.
“California’s original ban on plastic bags hasn’t worked out as planned,” said State Sen. Catherine Blakespear, “and sadly, the state’s plastic bag waste has increased dramatically since it went into effect.”
...
New Jersey, for example, saw a threefold increase in plastic consumption for grocery bags, according to research. The Garden State’s law was similar to California’s.
...
The problem was, much like in California, customers were only using the bags a few times before trashing them, and according the New York Times, a typical polypropylene bag must be used “at least 10 times” for it to offset the additional energy required to manufacture them compared to the thin bag.
...
Instead of simply rescinding the statewide ban on thin plastic grocery bags, which backfired so badly, California lawmakers decided to ban all plastic grocery bags in stores.
...
One reason thin plastic bags are popular is that they are convenient and efficient: the bags are light, cheap, and can be discarded after a single use. Heavy duty bags cost much more, but higher costs are not the only secondary consequence.
Heavy duty bags also require a great deal more maintenance. They must be washed routinely, which requires energy. The amount of energy it requires to wash reusable bags is higher than the amount of energy it takes to produce single-use plastic grocery bags, sustainability researchers say.
...
But higher energy and monetary costs are not the only secondary consequences. If heavy-duty reusable bags are not washed routinely and stored properly, they can become riddled with germs and bacteria, health department warn, particularly E. coli and Salmonella, which can cause food poisoning.
...
The best case scenario for California’s law is that in exchange for a bit less plastic trash, consumers will spend a great deal of time, energy, and money maintaining their reusable cotton shopping bags. The worst case scenario (or one of them) is that consumers will not spend sufficient time and energy maintaining their heavy tote bags, and as a result the state will experience a spike in foodborne illnesses."
- rest of article at Cali Lawmakers Admit the Plastic Bag Ban Backfired, So They're Doubling Down | The Daily Economy
...
Though the law was sold as a “win-win for the environment” by lawmakers, a decade later it’s clear the bill was no such thing, something California lawmakers today concede.
“California’s original ban on plastic bags hasn’t worked out as planned,” said State Sen. Catherine Blakespear, “and sadly, the state’s plastic bag waste has increased dramatically since it went into effect.”
...
New Jersey, for example, saw a threefold increase in plastic consumption for grocery bags, according to research. The Garden State’s law was similar to California’s.
...
The problem was, much like in California, customers were only using the bags a few times before trashing them, and according the New York Times, a typical polypropylene bag must be used “at least 10 times” for it to offset the additional energy required to manufacture them compared to the thin bag.
...
Instead of simply rescinding the statewide ban on thin plastic grocery bags, which backfired so badly, California lawmakers decided to ban all plastic grocery bags in stores.
...
One reason thin plastic bags are popular is that they are convenient and efficient: the bags are light, cheap, and can be discarded after a single use. Heavy duty bags cost much more, but higher costs are not the only secondary consequence.
Heavy duty bags also require a great deal more maintenance. They must be washed routinely, which requires energy. The amount of energy it requires to wash reusable bags is higher than the amount of energy it takes to produce single-use plastic grocery bags, sustainability researchers say.
...
But higher energy and monetary costs are not the only secondary consequences. If heavy-duty reusable bags are not washed routinely and stored properly, they can become riddled with germs and bacteria, health department warn, particularly E. coli and Salmonella, which can cause food poisoning.
...
The best case scenario for California’s law is that in exchange for a bit less plastic trash, consumers will spend a great deal of time, energy, and money maintaining their reusable cotton shopping bags. The worst case scenario (or one of them) is that consumers will not spend sufficient time and energy maintaining their heavy tote bags, and as a result the state will experience a spike in foodborne illnesses."
- rest of article at Cali Lawmakers Admit the Plastic Bag Ban Backfired, So They're Doubling Down | The Daily Economy
Last edited: