I started a thread devoted to Who Are the Missionary Baptists.Why do you use the name of Missionary Baptist or why is it used?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I started a thread devoted to Who Are the Missionary Baptists.Why do you use the name of Missionary Baptist or why is it used?
Maybe we should be less honest and pretend we like each otherI'm convinced that by in large. everyone in here hates each other. Lol
Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk
It's a little frustrating as I just came back to the forum and don't mind discussions but a lot of peeps in here are ruthless. Oh well. Such is.Maybe we should be less honest and pretend we like each other
Often it depends on the topic.It's a little frustrating as I just came back to the forum and don't mind discussions but a lot of peeps in here are ruthless. Oh well. Such is.
Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk
Ha yea like any theological topicOften it depends on the topic.
Or politics....or books.....or music....or Christian holidays....Ha yea like any theological topic
Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk
We should see if we can agree on chic fil a and go from there.Or politics....or books.....or music....or Christian holidays....
I gotta tell you, I'm not happy with their decision to ditch coleslaw...We should see if we can agree on chic fil a and go from there.
Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk
Because S. Truett Cathy was a member and teacher in a SBC church?I gotta tell you, I'm not happy with their decision to ditch coleslaw...
For me it's politics. Politics brings out the wrathful side of me.Often it depends on the topic.
For me it's politics. Politics brings out the wrathful side of me.
Only on days that end in Y.Nooooooo. You do not say?
I know many Calvinists that used the Romans road. They just used the whole road.But you are right. These things are tools that often get a bad rap, and from my experience normally from Calvinists. It is sad because many have shared testimonies of being reached with the gospel through the methods they now oppose.
I think the problem is often those opposed to one method or tool (like the Roman Road or EE) assume the method is all that is ever said. Insofar as evangelism, I do not know that the gospel itself is insufficient. The thing is we are not called to merely proclaim the gospel but to also disciple people.JonC,
I know many Calvinists that used the Romans road. They just used the whole road.
They filled in the potholes and missing portions of the road.
Know ing that what you win them with, is what you win them to, they filled out the road using portions of Romans that get skipped by.
I went ahead and jumped on this suggestion. The new thread is HERE.If you want to start a thread about the Roman Road...
We do not need to characterize entire denominations, churches, or “camps” based on our limited experience or on what we have read about these Christians with whom we find (or think we find) disagreement.
But you are right. These things are tools that often get a bad rap, and from my experience normally from Calvinists.
. But when we start categorizing other Christian churches based on our experiences it can cause unnecessary complications (as evidenced by your responses).
The point is, despite the objections, it is wrong to generalize the whole based on limited experience.
You have misunderstood.JonC,
from the OP.
But in post45;
in post50;
in post68;
You were trying to make a point here, and yet you seem to do what you say we should not do???see post 45.
Why not let people express what they want and stand by what they post. If you feel the way you do in post 45, fine...others feel as they do, that is also fine.
Too much saltWe should see if we can agree on chic fil a and go from there.
Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk