saturneptune
New Member
I believe mine was a valid question, regardless of the sarcasm others post.
If you are talking about my response, I did not mean it to come across that way.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I believe mine was a valid question, regardless of the sarcasm others post.
No sn, your post wasn't sarcastic.If you are talking about my response, I did not mean it to come across that way.
Would you call this pastor for you church?
(or somone like him?
I believe mine was a valid question, regardless of the sarcasm others post.
Good point in some situations. However, looking at the video, I get the feeling he uses this method in all situations. Is it really necessary to stop the sermon and point out everyone nodding off, and walking away from the pulpit? It seems more dramatics than focusing on a situation.
This character reminds me of a wife beater...after he has kicked the tar out of his wife, he goes back & tells her that he is sorry & he really loves her!
A guy like this ought not to be operating as a pastor....also keep him away from kids & animals.
He's 'important' (or so he says).
Not so rare behavior of IFB's in Oklahoma, Missouri, Texas and other places.
'Touch not God's annointed!' :type:
According to 1 Timothy, pastors that sin are to be rebuked before all. Why not congregants that clearly are in sin?
You are right. If he walked over to where I was sitting and made one of those remarks in front of all of my fellow church members, his tie would have been in a different position as he flew back up to the pulpit.
...and made one of those remarks in front of all of my fellow church members, his tie would have been in a different position ....
I think I will have to watch more of his videos, to watch how often he corrects others for "nodding off." Who knows? it could be something he doesn't always address.
I have only seen the one sermon, and heard news interviews that clearly don't broadcast everything in its proper context. After watching the entire one hour sermon, I really did not see a problem with his rebukes.
Everyone around the "boy" could see him nodding off. The pastor aroused him, pointing out that he was looking after the boys spiritual well-being. Nothing wrong with that, imo. I might have done the same thing if I was the pastor.
As to Mister Underwood, the man who wanted the pastor to marry him, that may or may not have been the proper time to address that man. Maybe the pastor had tried to reach him before and the man always avoided him. I know if I was laying out of Church, and the pastor was trying to contact me, I would probably avoid him... knowing the rebuke he might have for me.
The young man in the video room? The pastor was looking back toward the room at the time he gave that rebuke. Maybe he saw youth back there and felt he had to address that issue. My guess is he didn't see youth at that time, or no doubt he would have called those youth out of the room and into the congregation where they belonged.
Maybe the pastor had already talked with these "offenders" in the past privately, we don't know. But if their offense was open and obvious, as Mister Underwood's was, I see no problem with addressing it openly.
According to 1 Timothy, pastors that sin are to be rebuked before all. Why not congregants that clearly are in sin?