I took one scripture, which is true and cannot be broken, to refute one claim of yours. Now you say this does not offset "all the other didactic texts. But you did not reference any of them. Thus a generalization without specific support in scripture.
Yes, if we are willing to accept nonsense, we can stick with the advocacy of mystery to explain a logical impossibility. But since scripture answers the mystery, there is no need to accept nonsense. You argument is like advocating that God put invisible pink elephants in orbit around Mars. You cannot prove from scripture that he did not, and God is certainly able to do whatever He chooses to do. But if we stick with what scripture actually says, we can agree on the truth.
Lets just take one more example. In the book of Jonah, God tells Jonah to proclaim "in forty days Nineveh will be overturned." Now according to you God knew He would not overturn Nineveh, He was just telling them something He was able to do. But Satan is the father of lies, so to ascribe this behavior to God demeans God.
I could go on with other didactic texts which teach your view is mistaken. OTOH, I have addressed every single passage cited to support your view. Now of course, I am not allowed to repeat those arguments because they have been ruled "unorthodox." However, I do not believe we can find in the doctrinal statements of Baptists that everything is predestined, and therefore the orthodox view is limited open theism.
problem is that you are trying to reason your way tot he answer, need to accept what God has already declared in His word!
Also, once you lose concept of there really be free will in the strictest sense for man, that will help you also to see the truth!