• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Calvinism is Internally Inconsistent

Status
Not open for further replies.

Reformed1689

Well-Known Member
There are no passages that say that God chose the elect out of fallen man or God chose the elect and reprobate before the Fall. This is all philosophy.
Right because Romans doesn't teach this, Ephesians doesn't teach this, John doesn't teach this...oh brother. :rolleyes:
 

Reformed1689

Well-Known Member
Theology is Christ-centered. Calvinism is not (it is a philosophy that seeks to know God via the mind of the Father, not Christ). There are no passages to offer.
Theology means the study of God. It is God centered. Not Father or Christ centered, God centered.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Ah, see you think you published Calvinist doctrine. But really, you posted Van's caricature of Calvinist doctrine which isn't Calvinist doctrine at all. Some would call it strawman.
More of the same "change the subject based on false charges" behavior of nearly every Calvinist.

1) I post published Calvinist doctrine, not the frequent disavowals of the doctrine posted by deceit.
2) When the topic is "A" posting scripture whose topic is "B" the scripture is non-germane.
3) Ever notice how often Calvinists post "that is not what Calvinism claims" but do not offer the correct view?

Folks ever wonder how people could respond if Jesus had not hidden his message in parables. Read Matthew 13 Total Spiritual Inability is fiction.

Folks ever wonder why Christ laid down His life as a ransom for all, if Christ died only for the elect.

Folks, ever wonder why God chooses individuals for salvation through faith in the truth, if they were unable to trust in Christ?
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Ah, see you think you published Calvinist doctrine. But really, you posted Van's caricature of Calvinist doctrine which isn't Calvinist doctrine at all. Some would call it strawman.
Denial piled on denial, but ordained means predestined, which means Calvinism claims God predestined our every sin but is not the cause of our every sin. I kid you not.
 

Reformed1689

Well-Known Member
More of the same "change the subject based on false charges" behavior of nearly every Calvinist.

1) I post published Calvinist doctrine, not the frequent disavowals of the doctrine posted by deceit.
2) When the topic is "A" posting scripture whose topic is "B" the scripture is non-germane.
3) Ever notice how often Calvinists post "that is not what Calvinism claims" but do not offer the correct view?

Folks ever wonder how people could respond if Jesus had not hidden his message in parables. Read Matthew 13 Total Spiritual Inability is fiction.

Folks ever wonder why Christ laid down His life as a ransom for all, if Christ died only for the elect.

Folks, ever wonder why God chooses individuals for salvation through faith in the truth, if they were unable to trust in Christ?
Oh brother Van. You did not post Calvinism, you posted VanCalvinism. We have corrected you literally HUNDREDS of times.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oh brother Van. You did not post Calvinism, you posted VanCalvinism. We have corrected you literally HUNDREDS of times.
One idiotic denial after another, did this person not claim ordain does not mean predestine?

Why these rule violators are allowed to post endless falsehoods is beyond me...
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Well, by your reasoning here, any organizing of thought from scripture cannot be understood from scripture. None of the views could therefore be anything but philosophy with no scripture. I guess this explains Jonnyianism as well.
No. You are sking us to tell you the difference between "high Calvinism" and "low Calvinism" using Scripture.

It is a foolish request.
 

AustinC

Well-Known Member
No. You are sking us to tell you the difference between "high Calvinism" and "low Calvinism" using Scripture.

It is a foolish request.
Thus you show the foolishness of your own definitions. Your incapacity to define the difference from scripture shows that the concept is made up by people such as yourself.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Thus you show the foolishness of your own definitions. Your incapacity to define the difference from scripture shows that the concept is made up by people such as yourself.
Ok....OK.... test your hypothesis.

Tell me the difference between Reformation Arminianism (Classic Arminianism) and Wesleyan Arminianism using Scripture.

That you do not understand the differences between "high Calvinism" and "general Calvinism" just proves you do not understand Calvinism.

Before you adopt a philosophy you really should understand it.
 

AustinC

Well-Known Member
Ok....OK.... test your hypothesis.

Tell me the difference between Reformation Arminianism (Classic Arminianism) and Wesleyan Arminianism using Scripture.

That you do not understand the differences between "high Calvinism" and "general Calvinism" just proves you do not understand Calvinism.

Before you adopt a philosophy you really should understand it.
LOL, you prove my point with your response. This is great, however, you forgot to add Jonnyism to that list.
 

Reformed1689

Well-Known Member
Yeah actually we do.

You have not done anything to change ur view. In fact. All you have done is support what I have always known..

It’s also funny how I was brought into a thread I had no desire to be a part of.. smh
No you don't as you have shown time and time again. You are against a caricature of Calvinism.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top