• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Calvinism takes Biblical Truth Too Far

Robert Snow

New Member
Robert, I was noticing your better tone over the last week. This wasn't so much.


btw, I have plenty of Reese's left over. It was raining last night. :)

You are correct, I should not respond like this, but like quantumfaith says, it's p4t's condescending attitude that upsets me. He, no doubt, would be more respectful in person, thus the comment about being cowardly.

BTW, I'll be right over to share those peanut butter cups! :thumbs:
 

preacher4truth

Active Member
Robert,

I see you're replying already. Please keep in mind that name-calling and malicious treatment is proof of being incorrect and that you're losing.

I apologize that you didn't see the difference between physical/spiritual death in the passage as you should have. It was very apparent to me, as it well should be.

Anyhow, you employ these works of the flesh often against other brethren on the BB. I wonder what that means that you do this so often?

But still, bless you my friend.
 

preacher4truth

Active Member
You are correct, I should not respond like this, but like quantumfaith says, it's p4t's condescending attitude that upsets me. He, no doubt, would be more respectful in person, thus the comment about being cowardly.

BTW, I'll be right over to share those peanut butter cups! :thumbs:

Nothing I said was condescending. The fact is plainly there: the passage deals with physical death, not spiritual.

Here's what you've done:

1) Blamed your actions on another.

2) Called the other names.

3) Justified your actions "because of someone else."

4) Failed to stop and see that the passage was misused.

Wow. How biblically mature of you, and how responsible.

Nothing I said was condescending. You're attitude and qafs? Totally condescending while showing yourselves as incapable of admitting the error that is so plain. Instead of doing this, you come back, both of you, with hasty, cursory, and cynical responses, both with name calling.

I find the need of yourself, and of qaf to add malice and name-calling into this, both shameful, and unChrist-like behavior. A simple admittance that this text does not deal with spiritual death, but instead addresses physical death, and therefore does not apply to the subject at hand would've been sufficient, contrary to the name calling. In so doing we could've had mature, Christian dialogue.

You're not learning doing this. A wise man would've admitted the error. The proud and imprudent? Not so much. Instead of this, we have name-calling and an attack on a person, and on said persons theological stance, namely, against Calvinists and Calvinism, calling this doctrine false doctrine.

If you count pointing out what you so obviously missed in your hastiness to respond and attack Calvinism as "condescending", then that is shame on you, not me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

quantumfaith

Active Member
If you can't see the clear teaching of the passage that was given by DHK, that has nothing to do with spiritual death, but is instead dealing with physical death, well, then you need more help than I've ever considered.

I know it must be embarassing to you non-cals when someone points out something so glaringly obvious that you've totally missed. Again.

Then come the cynical responses out of an embarrased and shamed heart over what you just cannot see. Fiddlesticks!!!! :thumbsup:

Yes, I came to clear things up that are glaringly obvious, and you're still oblivious to it. And you teach new Christians?

I'm a coward? Any more names? I also hide? What does that mean? I teach false doctrine? Really? Where? And you can't see the false teaching of the mis-useage of this passage? I'm amazed! No, not really, this is status-quo for you all.

Wow. Imagine if a Calvinist said that on the BB. God bless you Robert Snow.

PFT, my responses to YOU are an attempt to get YOU to see how YOU respond to others in such dismissive ways. Yes, I do teach new Christians, and I am grateful for that opportunity. YOU are a pastor? Really? We could go on and on, all I have ever wanted is for your "corrections" to be a tad more conciliatory rather than denigrating toward your "opponent". It is your "manner" more than your message (not to mention history) which I do not share.
 

JesusFan

Well-Known Member
I will give you that proof. Be patient. It does not mean "lifeless."

So what are you more interested in: the process or the result. Are we going to be speaking how the brain slowly loses its capacity to function while at the same time the heart loses its power to function. If you want to talk about the "definition" of death specifically, then you are in for a long drawn out biological discussion. I am not interested in the shutting down of the bodily functions of a human being. What does it mean when the Bible says: "The wages of sin is death"? It is not speaking of the shutting down of the body until it becomes lifeless--that process. It is talking about the end result. The wages of sin is death--separation from God for all eternity. But the gift of God is eternal life--life with God for all eternity. There also is the end result of accepting God's gift.


adam died BOTH ohysically and spiritually when he chose to disobey God, sinned, and become fallen...

ALL of us now born into His image, and suffer same state/condition that he found himself in before God!

I believe in sola scriptura; you believe in sola dictionaria. That is fine. I will use the Bible as my authority; you can use the English dictionary as yours. As long as we have this understanding we are ok.

We beive in the Bible same way as you would, EXCEPT do NOT believe that it means cannot use any other sources to study and learn from then it, in this case English dictionaries!
Would you deny using one IF a person did know the english language that well?



Not so. Remember, I get my definition from the Bible, not English dictionaries.
No thanks, I will stick to what the Bible teaches. It is a much better teacher then the garbled football jargon you just tried to impart. Remember, my authority is the Word of God, the Bible.

Again, we believe that it is final inspired/revealed authority, but that God does expect us to study it diligently, in ths case with study tools such Greek/Hebrew texts and tools!

I am acquainted with the Greek. The Greek isn't the problem. When you ignore context and the teaching of the Word itself then you find yourself in trouble.

problem in this regard is that BOTH the context and the Greek/hebrew words used do NOT ascribe meaning to "death" as you are using them here!


It is; but a man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still.
Thus even if I give you a rational and convincing explanation you no doubt won't accept it.

THAT cuts both ways, Eh?

First, Physical Separation
For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also. (James 2:26)
--James defines actual physical death as separation of the spirit from the body. That is all that death is: separation of the spirit from the body.
Death, in the Bible, is always separation.

Second, Spiritual Separation
And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins; (Ephesians 2:1)
The KJV certainly added a lot to this verse. Did you notice how much of the verse was italicized?
Young's says:
Also you--being dead in the trespasses and the sins, (Ephesians 2:1)
(I'll save that for another discussion)

--The point is that the Ephesians were separated from God spiritually. They were not lifeless corpses or even lifeless spirits. They were separated from God because of sin. Sin had separated them from God, as all sin does. That is why Christ had to die for sin. They needed to be reconciled to God. They were separated from God and needed to be reconciled to God. Without that reconciliation there could be no life. That reconciliation would come through the Word of God and the Spirit of God, the two agencies by which a person is born again.

Sinners are born in a state/condition automatically estarnged from God, due to our sin sate, being found in Adam!
THAT is the cause of our seperation from God, you keep referring to the end result!



But your iniquities have separated between you and your God, and your sins have hid his face from you, that he will not hear. (Isaiah 59:2)

Third, Eternal Separation
For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. (Romans 6:23)
--I have already explained this verse. Notice that it is a contrast between eternal life and thus eternal death. God's gift is eternal life, contrasted with the wages of sin--eternal death. What is eternal death: separation from God for all eternity.
Death is always separation in the Bible.

WHAT though is the cause of that?
Not my sins commited against God, but that I am found by Him in Adam, dead in sin nature, and spiritually dead, even though physically alive!

Fourth. The Second Death
And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them. And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire. (Revelation 20:11-15)
Here is the scene of the Great White Throne Judgment: The Second Death. It is God's final judgment for all unsaved. Even death and hell will be cast into the lake of fire. The final sentence, the final result, will be separation from God for all eternity.

Death is separation in the Bible, all the time.

There is the evidence. Do with it as you will.


Again, your evidenced has been weighed byt he scales of the Bible, and been found wanting!
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
JesusFan, we wouldn't know as we cannot decipher through your convoluted posts. PLEASE use the quote feature correctly! You have been shown time and time again. If you cannot do something so simple, just respond to the whole quote! :BangHead:
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Again, your evidenced has been weighed byt he scales of the Bible, and been found wanting!
Try answering your own post JF. The above quote is all I see when I hit the quote button. My evidence is not found wanting. That is all I can respond to, that is basically all I can see. Try it yourself.
 

JesusFan

Well-Known Member
Try answering your own post JF. The above quote is all I see when I hit the quote button. My evidence is not found wanting. That is all I can respond to, that is basically all I can see. Try it yourself.

Please reply to # 106, as my replies to your original posting are all "in the box!"
 

jbh28

Active Member
Change the () to [].

(quote)bla bla bla bla(/quote)

You must have the (quote) and a following (/quote)

Otherwise it's hard to read.
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
Change the () to [].

(quote)bla bla bla bla(/quote)

You must have the (quote) and a following (/quote)

Otherwise it's hard to read.
He's been given these instructions again and again. He refuses to follow them.
 

preacher4truth

Active Member
Guess that its just predestined to happen when I post, Eh?

Jesusfan, since they have trouble denying some (well, most) of your arguments, they attack the fact you struggle with the quote feature instead. They have to win at something :thumbsup:

Imagine debating them and dismantling their theories live, and they want to start arguing about the podium you're using, or your shoes, anything but the issue.

:laugh:
 

JesusFan

Well-Known Member
Jesusfan, since they have trouble denying some (well, most) of your arguments, they attack the fact you struggle with the quote feature instead. They have to win at something :thumbsup:

Imagine debating them and dismantling their theories live, and they want to start arguing about the podium you're using, or your shoes, anything but the issue.

:laugh:

think that would be similiar to when they asked Jesus questions, and instead of directly answering them, had to first point out what the scriptures REALLY said and meant!
 

preacher4truth

Active Member
If you want to put deliberate ignorance on the back of God, that's on you.

Wow, imagine you of all people making a sardonic statement.

Try sticking to the OP? Oh, wait, nevermind, you invariably lose those when you do, then it turns into the above cynicism and prattle.

At least you're consistent. Congrats!!! :thumbs:
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
can we please go back to discussing the Bible, instead of going off to "rabbit trails?"
Hard to discuss anything when you have to decipher through a long post with quote inside of quote and not understanding who said what.

It's a simple thing to do...I have no idea why the stubbornness in refusing to do it the right way.
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
think that would be similiar to when they asked Jesus questions, and instead of directly answering them, had to first point out what the scriptures REALLY said and meant!
Hardly. I'm sure they would know how to use the quote feature properly. You have had every one of your questions answered (regardless of what your side kick says). You don't like the answers.
 
Top