Calvinism View of John 6-The Judas Conundrum

[Inspector Javert]

Actually I speak from experience. I have known him for a number of years. And he is not an anti-semite. That accusation is extreme and out of line.

I've seen some of the P.M.'s he has sent to Dr. J....and I also speak from experience. He has become increasingly MORE anti-Semitic than he previously was over time....

That accusation is absolute. I stand by it. I claim that I understand the nuance of what I speak of and I publically claim that you are uninformed. I've read his posts for years.

I've seen what he's posted to Dr. J. and you have not.
I say that my assessment is Absolutely correct, and your information is out-dated.

 

[Revmitchell]

I've seen some of the P.M.'s he has sent to Dr. J....and I also speak from experience. He has become increasingly MORE anti-Semitic than he previously was over time....

That accusation is absolute. I stand by it. I claim that I understand the nuance of what I speak of and I publically claim that you are uninformed. I've read his posts for years.

I've seen what he's posted to Dr. J. and you have not.
I say that my assessment is Absolutely correct, and your information is out-dated.

I know more that you think I do. You are out of line.

 

[DrJamesAch]

Hmm...

Another example of EWF name calling because someone merely said he is a Calvinist:

http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=2003003&postcount=4

Hmm...

EWF obviously takes great offense to being referred to as a Calvinist yet he lashes out with his stereotypical examples of unethical, yet typically claimed to be “logical” debate methods [usually accompanied with his treasured horse laugh fallacy] but it appears Dr. JamesAch is one step ahead of him.

http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?t=87103

As we can all see Dr. JamesAch pinpoints the evasion of the typical opposition to it roots demonstrated in here in that not only does EWF attack when the doctrines of Calvinist are mentioned, but does so with very poor debate ethics and goals – EWF “logically” reasons it is “dirty name calling to call him a Calvinist and that that somehow justifies him to call dirty names back...hmm...

- But yet it stands that we still we know what you are a Calvinist EWF. Your typical style of "logical" debate back at you: [horselaugh] :laugh::laugh: [/horselaugh]

What's funny about this is all his friends are justifying it. I said nothing different about Calvinism than they say about Non Calvinists. There is a thread right now started by agedman that accuses Non Calvinists of struggling with John 6. Yet that is not considered "personal". It is only when a Non Calvinist presents a logical refutation of Calvinism that were are ALWAYS accused of attacking Calvinists personally, and yet I have yet to see a Non Calvinist attack someones race because of their views about a DOCTRINAL position.

EWF's comment was the 3rd comment of this thread, and yet Saturneptune said I provoked EWF to write it. I don't see EWF's name mentioned in the OP. I see a reasonable argument against Calvinism, and yet instead of addressing the post, EWF writes, "LOL..idiot zionist". When asked how I provoked THAT response, not only was that not explained, it is being DEFENDED by all of his Calvinist buddies.

 

[Earth Wind and Fire]

I've seen some of the P.M.'s he has sent to Dr. J....and I also speak from experience. He has become increasingly MORE anti-Semitic than he previously was over time....

That accusation is absolute. I stand by it. I claim that I understand the nuance of what I speak of and I publically claim that you are uninformed. I've read his posts for years.

I've seen what he's posted to Dr. J. and you have not.
I say that my assessment is Absolutely correct, and your information is out-dated.

Are you talking about me!!! If so, I never sent that guy any PM's....so you must be discussing somebody else, right!

 

[Earth Wind and Fire]

What's funny about this is all his friends are justifying it. I said nothing different about Calvinism than they say about Non Calvinists. There is a thread right now started by agedman that accuses Non Calvinists of struggling with John 6. Yet that is not considered "personal". It is only when a Non Calvinist presents a logical refutation of Calvinism that were are ALWAYS accused of attacking Calvinists personally, and yet I have yet to see a Non Calvinist attack someones race because of their views about a DOCTRINAL position.

EWF's comment was the 3rd comment of this thread, and yet Saturneptune said I provoked EWF to write it. I don't see EWF's name mentioned in the OP. I see a reasonable argument against Calvinism, and yet instead of addressing the post, EWF writes, "LOL..idiot zionist". When asked how I provoked THAT response, not only was that not explained, it is being DEFENDED by all of his Calvinist buddies.

I see....your out of bullets. :smilewinkgrin:

 

[Earth Wind and Fire]

Meh....I don't really care much...but, as a Southerner, I must confess, you didn't EXACTLY use the phrase "cotton-pickin minute" quite correctly... it didn't work.

You tried, and did pretty well, but it just wasn't QUITE there....

Bro....you're a garbage sinner and so am I...we are BOTH trash in comparison to Jesus and the Almighty God who has decided to show us mercy.....

Who CARES!!! In heaven, bro... we'll both be "Trophies of Grace"...perfectly placed in the Body of Christ. So, let's not care a fig for who did what to whom.

You are gonna hang with me in glory dude :thumbsup: That's what matters:thumbsup: Praise God!!!!

Well I never claimed I was a Southerner....you will never hear a Yall outa me. But I think we could well have a beer & discuss it without animosity. :thumbsup:

 

[Benjamin]

What's funny about this is all his friends are justifying it.

Yes, I know, typical Calvinist responses, and not only that but accountability has been demonstrated to be with prejudice:

Originally Posted by Earth, Wind & Fire
[snipped]

Last edited by Dr. Bob; Today at 10:19 AM. Reason: Name calling. First part was accurate, *[] but not the slur ...*{bias in our face}

AS pointed out here:
http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=2004818&postcount=18

But in all fairness EWF does claim to have a 'logical" excuse not to be held accountable for his constant stereotypical meaningless rhetorical personal attacks on this "debate" board...He is "from NJ". [horselaugh] :laugh: [/horselaugh]

 

[DrJamesAch]

I see....your out of bullets. :smilewinkgrin:

Bullets aren't my only weapons I am equally just as dangerous with a compound bow, SOGM37, nunchakus, shurikans or tooth picks, and I have a pretty nasty guillotine hold, and a triangular choke hold that I can implement within about 2 seconds from the guard position. My right cross isn't too bad either :thumbsup: