Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Broken record.Yet another "taint so" post. More deflection, more obfuscation.
Correction, those who are not saved were never drawn by the Father.Everyone saved was drawn by the Father through the gospel. But everyone drawn by the Father through the gospel was not saved. See Matthew 13.
Broken record.
Correction, those who are not saved were never drawn by the Father.
Why do you think it is metaphorical?Draw, when used metaphorically means to persuade or attract such as by demonstrating God's lovingkindness.
Truth requires evidence. There is no evidence of this claim. Show where ALL are drawn by the Father.All saved were drawn, but not all drawn by the Father through the gospel are saved. Simple truth.
Good Grief, and your side suggests I do not read.Truth requires evidence. There is no evidence of this claim. Show where ALL are drawn by the Father.
Good Grief, and your side suggests I do not read.
Where does it say ALL (every individual) are drawn?Good Grief, and your side suggests I do not read.
More absurdity, more strawman misrepresentations, more falsehoods.Where does it say ALL (every individual) are drawn?
By asking a question? No sir, it is not me being absurd.More absurdity, more strawman misrepresentations, more falsehoods.
So not everyone is drawn? If not everyone is drawn then God obviously does not will salvation for each individual since they can only come to Christ if drawn by the Father.All saved were drawn not mean everyone was drawn. The constant and deliberate misrepresentations prove there is no support in scripture for the TULI doctrines of the tulip.
All saved were drawn, but not all drawn by the Father through the gospel are saved. Simple truth.
So not everyone is drawn? If not everyone is drawn then God obviously does not will salvation for each individual since they can only come to Christ if drawn by the Father.
Here, you impose your plan of salvation over and against the one presented in scripture. God chose to use witnesses to spread the gospel, but not everyone has heard the gospel. Scripture once again says God desires all men to be saved. To deny this is to deny scripture
I've already blown your argument out of the water. You have finally agreed that not every man is drawn and therefore God does not choose all to be saved. Welcome to the doctrines of grace Van.
Yes, all men as in all people groups. Look at the context.David
Joh 12:32 And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me.
Before the crucifixion God drew men after the crucifixion Christ draws all men
MB
Yes, all men as in all people groups. Look at the context.
This is just ignorant. Two words cannot be the whole context.The context is "all men" It is simple and plain with out complications and no matter how much you try it will never say anything else but all men. People should never try to make scripture say what it does not say.
MB
Note the claim of evidence presented in the unreferenced past. Twaddle
I always maintained not all men are saved, but all saved were drawn. However not all drawn were saved. So by the numbers:
1) God draws people through the gospel, where they "behold" Jesus high and lifted up, dying for their sins.
2) Not everyone hears the gospel.
3) Not everyone who hears the gospel understands it.
4) Only those who hear and understand the gospel are drawn by the Father
5) Not everyone drawn fully receives the gospel. For example the second and third soils of Matthew 13 did not go "all in" for Christ.
6) God does not credit the faith of every professing believer (i.e. second and third soil). Therefore not all drawn are chosen and saved.
What is ignorant is taking two words and trying to make them say something they clearly do not.This is just ignorant. Two words cannot be the whole context.
Good thing I didn't do that.What is ignorant is taking two words and trying to make them say something they clearly do not.
MB
It is simple. The context is all men meaning both Jew and Gentile.The context is "all men" It is simple and plain with out complications and no matter how much you try it will never say anything else but all men. People should never try to make scripture say what it does not say.
MB
Once again, scripture is denied.So how does God decide who is drawn and who is not? By the way, where is the evidence that the Father draws some that end up not believing? The Matthew passage does not say those who did not receive were drawn by the Father. Also, does not credit the faith of every professing believer? Where in the world do you see that? This is a butchering of Scripture. In fact, it is unbiblical.