As Isaid it is in the same scripture tha says Benjamin Dan, Isachar may not touch the ark. The proof was posted. If you read the Bible and the verses posted. However, You do not like the Bible as your authority, that is why you follow the teachings of Luther. Paul said n anyman think himself to be a prophet or spiritual let him acknowledge that the things I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord. Could Luther say this. NOT IN A MILLION YEARS. Luther was over a thousand years late with his teachings.
Finally, to the rational mind it has been proven.
You just deny the evidence and are irrational
Spoken like somebody truly ignorant of the truth. You obviously no nothing of Luther since you claim I do not like the Bible as an authority concidering one of three main tenants is Sola Scriptura - literally means by scripture alone. Which means our doctrine is drawn from scripture because it is our final authority. Now I am not going to sit around and let you spout off your ignorant insults. I told you to start studying the beliefs of the differing denominations before you criticize, because you are only going to get your head handed to you and your posts ignored. I do know Luther's teachings and from your post it is obvious you don't so here is a little free education.
Luther on the Bible.
"Scripture is God's testimony concerning himself" (v10. 1018)
"After all, no book, no teaching, or word is able to comfort in troubles, fear, misery, death, yea, in the midst of devils and in hell, except this book, which teaches us God's Word and in which God himself speaks with us as a man speaks with his friend" (v.9, 1788)
"He who carefully reads and studies the Scriptures will consider nothing so trifling that it does not at least contribute to the improvement of his life and morals, since the Holy Spirit wanted to ahve it comitted to writing" (v.1, 794)
"But the letters of God are to be read three times, seven times, yes, seventy times seven times, or to say even more, an infinite number of times, because they are divince wisdom, which cannot so easily be comprehended at fist glance. If, therefore, anyone reads Scripture casually, as well known and easy material, he is deceiving himself (v.1,1055)
"We are to search, says He, not to sit in judgement; not to be masters, but pupils; not to inject our notions into Scripture, but get Christ's testimony out of it; and as long as Christ is not found aright in it, it is also not being searched aright" (9, 1819)
If we hated the authority of the Bible so much why would we require our pastors to learn greek and hebrew? Why would we read aloud passages in the Bible during worship service?
You know nothing about which you criticize.
Luther was over a thousand years late with his teachings.
And about 500 years earlier than your teachings.
I am still waiting for you to explain how a completely unrelated scripture passage is supposed to prove your point? You have not and cannot prove your point, because the evidence that is required to prove your point does not exist.
PS- you didn't answer my questions concerning commentaries, etc.
