Miles and Van Pelt's Text is NOT up to par with Mounce's in terms of quality and organization
Thank you. I was starting to think I was the only crazy one
I've yet to find the best Hebrew for self-study.
Their suggestions were helpful, answered my questions, and was MUCH better than just giving me an answer I would forget two hours later...they taught me how to find the answers myself.
The tenor of your post seemed derisive. I had wonderful profs who were able to explain things four or five different ways when the book only had one. So it helped those who needed it. No one would deny a book or prof can only take you so far. Well, almost......
One thing my professors have taught me, is that you can find an answer to any question, on your own, if your willing to put in the time.
This may be. But some professors are so good at stimulating thought that you ask questions you didn't know to ask. You just made my point, actually.
Further, what if the book you are using is substandard? I'm right now re-reading a Christian philosophy text that is squarely in that category. Its glossary is threadbare. Its discussion is very weak. But the professor back in the day could say in one sentence what the author would try to say in a page. The guy using this book on his own would be lost. That said, some professors are poor and couldn't teach a fish how to swim. But fortunately I've never had too many bad experiences with professors.
I am not attacking the classroom. I am attacking the idea that it is necessary. Some people on this board think that the rules governing the Greek language are to be found nowhere but in the minds of Seminary professors, which can only be accessed by hefty tuition. This is false. In fact, I believe for some people the self taught route is BETTER...for the reasons I mentioned. And I believe ANYONE with motivation and average learning ability CAN learn Greek without a single class, if they are willing to put in the work.
At times it sure comes off like you attack it.
I'm not arguing with your premise. I'm as sympathetic to your views as anyone; I just think the arguments could be made better. Some people are better self-learners. Some people are better in a classroom. The classroom has benefits while self-study has others. Everyone CAN learn ANYTHING without a class. Everyone CAN learn ANYTHING with a class. It's when you start ruling out one or the other that one gets logically untenable.
Isn't it funny that, so many who learned on their own (like Broadus, Spurgeon, et.al.,) started schools?