or is it if you miss the very nature of God, have a fake One?
For Oneness pentacostals, and those holding to Modualism do not have real God, correct?
I think maybe some clarification is in order. In my estimation, the word "nature" denotes substance.
In case that wasn't clear, let me use a few examples to better demonstrate how I understand "nature"
The nature or substance of water is hydrogen and oxygen.
The nature of plywood is wood and glue
The nature of a ball bearing is metal
And since the scriptures teach that the "substance" of God is Spirit, then what does nature have to with Trinity? Now, all I am doing is asking for clarification of one word.
Kenneth Copeland believes that God is a Spirit being with a body, who is about 9 feet tall. But He affirms a 3-in-1 Trinity of coequal Persons. How this would work, I cannot pretend to know
I would consider that he has missed the nature of God, but affirms the Trinity as described in the creeds.
So, I would surmise that someone can affirm what is considered a "biblical" Trinity, yet also miss on the nature of God. I don't see "nature" as necessarily corresponding to any concept of Trinity. It is possible that the two can be mutually exclusive
So can you clarify exactly what you're asking ?