Heavenly Pilgrim
New Member
HP: Logic implies that something cannot be A and not A at the same time and in the same sense. Logic does NOT imply that something can be A and not A at the same time in 'differing' senses.Steaver: This is double talk and error.
It is not double talk nor is it in error. Your failure to understand is due to your illogical insistence that a word cannot be used in two differing senses without incurring a contradiction. Your failure to comprehend the truth of this matter in no wise necessitates error or double talk.
Just as Scripture states that faith without works is dead being alone does not in any way contradict the Scripture that states that we are saved by faith without works. The two passages are speaking of works in two distinct senses and usages of the word ‘works.’ Works again can be thought of in the sense of ‘not without which’ used by James, and ‘that for the sake of’ that is used when it states that we are saved apart from works. Yes Steaver, it can be said without contradiction, double talk, or error that we are saved without works yet cannot be saved apart from works. One speaks directly to the grounds of salvation which is apart from human effort and the other speaks to the conditions of salvation that clearly involve the intents of man, without which no one shall be saved.