Castle for President

[carpro]

Voting 3rd party or abstaining hasn't ever changed a thing, but hey, keep believing illogical nonsense. BTW, every candidate is evil in every election. Not voting Trump in order to negate a Hillary vote is to vote her into office, and a 3rd party/write-in will not negate one vote cast for her.

It got Clinton elected in 1992 and led directly to where we are now....leading to another Clinton presidency. This time, this constitutional republic will not survive without sustaining irreparable harm.

 

[Internet Theologian]

It is of note that those who proclaim their morals, principles, conscience in voting are, well, generally the ones offering inflammatory comments, name-calling, derogatory comments, something they loathe in candidates but practice themselves...LOL!!!!

 

[Rippon]

Only by voting third party (or abstaining) can any change be effected in the sort of candidates that get nominated.

The above is entirely illogical.

 

[InTheLight]

The above is entirely illogical.

Yes, it is not very clear. What I meant to say was voting third party can affect future nominees.

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo

 

[Salty]

Yes, it is not very clear. What I meant to say was voting third party can affect future nominees.

and it can effect that election - as evidence by 1992 ( previously noted) 1912 , , ,1860 , 1876 , 1880, 1884, 1888, 1892,