• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Catholic Inventions?

Melanie

Active Member
Site Supporter
As usual Bob has gone on and on about a selected biblical quote which his denomination has seen fit to exclude from the Bible and ignores the fact there were several other quotes cited.

It seems to me that it is a case I will select what I am comfortable with Lord but I will ignore what I WILL not.

In response to the above by DHK you prefer the history as written by the anti-catholics who write what they want to read rather than the truth.
Get real human beings are flawed critturs and the unpalatable facts are always sugar coated, faults lie with all creeds and denominations.

B-G
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Deal with Scripture. You can't refute the Scriptures can you. John 6 is filled with metaphors includint "This is my flesh, eat ye it." "This is my blood..."
Is it literal or symbolic? Is it a metaphor? Obciously a metaphor. I was challenged to show any hint of a similie or a metaphor in John 6. The person who gave me that challenge was evidently ignorant as to what a metaphor was. I posted all the metaphors in the chapter. And yet you refuse to believe.
Jesus said: "You will die in your unbelief."

Consider again these metaphors:
Ye are the salt of the earth.
I am the bread of life.
This is my body.
This is by blood.

Put it all on the table.
What a feast we could have.

What kind of bread would it be when Jesus said:
Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees?

Perhaps the tastiest part would be the salt. Or, no, that would be the most corrupted wouldn't it?
DHK
 

john6:63

New Member
Originally posted by DHK:
Please take a literature course and understand what a metaphor is.
Almost every verse I posted was a metaphor.
I may be a product of the Tennessee School system, but I do have more that 7 years education and I do know what a simile is and there is not one simile in John Chapter 6. IF Jesus would’ve said, “my body is LIKE bread”, then we have a simile.

If you take John 6:35 and you isolate the phrase I am the bread of life… you will have a metaphor, but come on DHK, I’ve been a Fundamentalists since I was knee high to a grasshopper and we Fundamentalists never isolate a verse and create a doctrine out of it. We slam the JWs, Mormons and the SDAs for that. We always take the verse in its full context and let Scripture explain Scripture.

In addition, our Lord takes John 6 far beyond just a metaphor in verse 35 by saying, For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.


Originally posted by DHK:
I am the bread of life.
That is a figure of speech; a metaphor. Was Jesus a loaf of bread? No. This is a metaphor. The bread symbolically stood for something. It is your duty to find out what that bread of life meant that Jesus was referring to. Jesus spoke using these figures all the time. He used such metaphors, and parables as well, often. How can you deny this.
And I don’t deny that Jesus spoke in parables and used metaphors, but John 6 was a sermon, not a parable and IF it were a parable Jesus would’ve alluded as such, as he had always done in the past. His disciples had been with Jesus for sometime now and had witnessed Him preach and even here His disciples mummer amongst themselves. So again, I don’t believe Jesus would’ve let any of His disciples leave over a little misunderstanding over a metaphor for crying out loud.


Originally posted by DHK:
Many of his so-called disciples left for two reasons. Jesus identified them for you. He said plainly that they followed him not because of the spiritual food but because of the physical food that he had fed them with. They didn't care about spiritual things.
If Jesus was talking of spiritual food, then Paul in 1 Cor. 10:16 didn’t receive the memo, because Paul forgot to include the phrase spiritual food. Also, IF the writers of the bible wanted to make it known that the Lord’s Supper was a purely spiritual sacrament, and then the message didn’t get across until the Reformation, because not one early Church father denied the Real Presence, but endorsed it.

Originally posted by DHK:
A second reason was that the things that he had been teaching his disciples, some of them understood, but went away anyway, because these things were too hard for them to accept. To be a disciple requires sacrifice. They were not willing to pay the price to be a disciple. Thus they walked away. For these two reasons many left.
They left because they realized that Jesus was being serious about His flesh being food indeed and His blood being drink indeed. Eating flesh and drinking blood went against what Moses had taught, and their thinking was on a human level. John 6:63 flesh profits nothing refers to human understanding, to think on a human level instead of a spiritual one. Jesus would not command us to eat His flesh, but then say His flesh is useless. Otherwise, the Incarnation is useless as well. Jesus became man in the flesh, died in the flesh, and rose in the flesh. He saved us by His fleshand it is the method He chose for our salvation: the Cross.
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Originally posted by john6:63:

I may be a product of the Tennessee School system, but I do have more that 7 years education and I do know what a simile is and there is not one simile in John Chapter 6. IF Jesus would’ve said, “my body is LIKE bread”, then we have a simile.
No argument. But that is not what the Scripture says.
If you take John 6:35 and you isolate the phrase I am the bread of life… you will have a metaphor, but come on DHK, I’ve been a Fundamentalists since I was knee high to a grasshopper and we Fundamentalists never isolate a verse and create a doctrine out of it. We slam the JWs, Mormons and the SDAs for that. We always take the verse in its full context and let Scripture explain Scripture.
So demonstrate to me where I am doing that. I just finished demonstrating that I didn't isolate anything by taking the entire chapter and show how Jesus used one metaphor after another consistently throughout the whole chapter. How can you even infer that it is an isolated case. The whole passage that you are referring to is filled with metaphors and symbolic language. Do you really think that Jesus is saying: "Here, I am a cannibal. I expect you to be one too. Take a chunk of my flesh and eat it." Are you that literal. Are you also a Catholic John?

In addition, our Lord takes John 6 far beyond just a metaphor in verse 35 by saying, For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.
Obviously it is more metaphorical or symbolic language. Else how would you understand it? Is his flesh food to eat. When did you eat a chunk of the flesh of Christ? Were you there 2,000 years ago to do that? Tell me about it. Did you have it medium rare, or well done?
Originally posted by DHK:
I am the bread of life.
That is a figure of speech; a metaphor. Was Jesus a loaf of bread? No. This is a metaphor. The bread symbolically stood for something. It is your duty to find out what that bread of life meant that Jesus was referring to. Jesus spoke using these figures all the time. He used such metaphors, and parables as well, often. How can you deny this.
And I don’t deny that Jesus spoke in parables and used metaphors, but John 6 was a sermon, not a parable and IF it were a parable Jesus would’ve alluded as such, as he had always done in the past. His disciples had been with Jesus for sometime now and had witnessed Him preach and even here His disciples mummer amongst themselves. So again, I don’t believe Jesus would’ve let any of His disciples leave over a little misunderstanding over a metaphor for crying out loud.
Jesus didn't always indicate when he was speaking in either parables or metaphors. That is a false assumption your part. You need to study your Bible more. Yes, it may be a sermon, or at least part of sermon. Does that limit Christ to strictly literal speech? Is one not allowed to use figures of speech in a sermon? Did Jesus say: "It is easier for a camel to through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God." What do you call the "eye of a needle?" This also is a figure of speech. But in what context was it used?
Why are you trying to confine and restrict the kind of language Jesus uses?
Those disciples that left him, left him because they didn't want to follow the teachings that he was giving. It was too difficult for them to bear.

John 6:60 Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an hard saying; who can hear it?
--They left for this reason. They say it is a hard saying. The expression "Who can hear it?" means who is able to obey it. They didn't want to accept and obey what he had to say. Therefore they left.
Originally posted by DHK:
Many of his so-called disciples left for two reasons. Jesus identified them for you. He said plainly that they followed him not because of the spiritual food but because of the physical food that he had fed them with. They didn't care about spiritual things.
If Jesus was talking of spiritual food, then Paul in 1 Cor. 10:16 didn’t receive the memo, because Paul forgot to include the phrase spiritual food. Also, IF the writers of the bible wanted to make it known that the Lord’s Supper was a purely spiritual sacrament, and then the message didn’t get across until the Reformation, because not one early Church father denied the Real Presence, but endorsed it.
You must be a Catholic.
There are no sacraments in Scripture.
There are two ordinances that Christ gave to the church: baptism and the Lord's Table. A sacrament gives grace. One doesn't gain grace by means of baptism or the Lord's Table. They are commands given by the Lord for the church to obey.

As for 1Cor.10:16
1 Corinthians 10:16 The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?
--The word "communion" simply means "fellowship."
We fellowship one with another around the Lord's Table, as believers. Check the context. Then go to 1Cor.11 and see that the elements simply reflect in a symbolic way the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ. We are to remember his death through partaking of them. It is not for physical food. If you want a meal, Paul rebuked them and told them that they had houses to eat in. The Lord's house (the church) was not for a meal. It was for spiritual food, that is, the Word of God. It was for remembering the death and sacrifice of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Originally posted by DHK:
A second reason was that the things that he had been teaching his disciples, some of them understood, but went away anyway, because these things were too hard for them to accept. To be a disciple requires sacrifice. They were not willing to pay the price to be a disciple. Thus they walked away. For these two reasons many left.
They left because they realized that Jesus was being serious about His flesh being food indeed and His blood being drink indeed. Eating flesh and drinking blood went against what Moses had taught, and their thinking was on a human level. John 6:63 flesh profits nothing refers to human understanding, to think on a human level instead of a spiritual one. Jesus would not command us to eat His flesh, but then say His flesh is useless. Otherwise, the Incarnation is useless as well. Jesus became man in the flesh, died in the flesh, and rose in the flesh. He saved us by His fleshand it is the method He chose for our salvation: the Cross.
Nice thoughts but that is not what the Scripture says.
John 6:60-61 Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an hard saying; who can hear it? When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend you?

They were offended at his teaching. They left because his teaching offended them. It was too difficult for them to follow. It required sacrifice, something that they were unwilling to do.

John 6:64 But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him.
--Unbelief also was a big factor.
DHK
 

Living4Him

New Member
There are no sacraments in Scripture.
1. Baptism - Few truths are so clearly taught in the New Testament as the doctrine that in baptism God gives us grace. Again and again the sacred writers tell us that it is in baptism that we are saved, buried with Christ, incorporated into his body, washed of our sins, regenerated, cleansed, and so on (see Acts 2:38, 22:16; Rom. 6:1–4; 1 Cor. 6:11, 12:13; Gal. 3:26–27; Eph. 5:25-27; Col. 2:11–12; Titus 3:5; 1 Pet. 3:18–22).

John 3:5, Jesus says, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God."

The great commission in Matthew 28:19: "Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit."

2. Penance - "If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just, and will forgive our sins and cleanse us from all unrighteousness" (1 John 1:9). Minor or venial sins can be confessed directly to God, but for grave or mortal sins, which crush the spiritual life out of the soul, God has instituted a different means for obtaining forgiveness—the sacrament known popularly as confession, penance, or reconciliation.

This sacrament is rooted in the mission God gave to Christ in his capacity as the Son of man on earth to go and forgive sins (cf. Matt. 9:6). Thus, the crowds who witnessed this new power "glorified God, who had given such authority to men" (Matt. 9:8; note the plural "men"). After his resurrection, Jesus passed on his mission to forgive sins to his ministers, telling them, "As the Father has sent me, even so I send you. . . . Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained" (John 20:21–23).

3. Confirmation - The sacrament of confirmation is found in Bible passages such as Acts 8:14–17, 9:17, 19:6, and Hebrews 6:2, which speak of a laying on of hands for the purpose of bestowing the Holy Spirit.

Hebrews 6:2 is especially important because it is not a narrative account of how confirmation was given and, thus, cannot be dismissed by those who reject the sacrament as something unique to the apostolic age. In fact, the passage refers to confirmation as one of Christianity’s basic teachings, which is to be expected since confirmation, like baptism, is a sacrament of initiation into the Christian life.

We read: "Therefore let us leave the elementary teachings of Christ and go on to maturity, not laying again the foundation of repentance from acts that lead to death, and of faith in God, instruction about baptisms, the laying on of hands, the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment" (Heb. 6:1–2).

4. Holy Eucharist - John 6:30 begins a colloquy that took place in the synagogue at Capernaum. The Jews asked Jesus what sign he could perform so that they might believe in him. As a challenge, they noted that "our ancestors ate manna in the desert." Could Jesus top that? He told them the real bread from heaven comes from the Father. "Give us this bread always," they said. Jesus replied, "I am the bread of life; whoever comes to me will never hunger, and whoever believes in me will never thirst." At this point the Jews understood him to be speaking metaphorically.
Jesus first repeated what he said, then summarized: "‘I am the living bread which came down from heaven; if any one eats of this bread, he will live for ever; and the bread which I shall give for the life of the world is my flesh.’ The Jews then disputed among themselves, saying, ‘How can this man give us his flesh to eat?’" (John 6:51–52).

His listeners were stupefied because now they understood Jesus literally—and correctly. He again repeated his words, but with even greater emphasis, and introduced the statement about drinking his blood: "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him" (John 6:53–56).
Notice that Jesus made no attempt to soften what he said, no attempt to correct "misunderstandings," for there were none. Our Lord’s listeners understood him perfectly well. They no longer thought he was speaking metaphorically. If they had, if they mistook what he said, why no correction?

On other occasions when there was confusion, Christ explained just what he meant (cf. Matt. 16:5–12). Here, where any misunderstanding would be fatal, there was no effort by Jesus to correct. Instead, he repeated himself for greater emphasis.

In John 6:60 we read: "Many of his disciples, when they heard it, said, ‘This is a hard saying; who can listen to it?’" These were his disciples, people used to his remarkable ways. He warned them not to think carnally, but spiritually: "It is the Spirit that gives life, the flesh is of no avail; the words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life" (John 6:63; cf. 1 Cor. 2:12–14).

But he knew some did not believe. (It is here, in the rejection of the Eucharist, that Judas fell away; look at John 6:64.) "After this, many of his disciples drew back and no longer went about with him" (John 6:66).


5. Anointing of the Sick - The anointing of the sick is administered to bring spiritual and even physical strength during an illness, especially near the time of death. It is most likely one of the last sacraments one will receive. A sacrament is an outward sign established by Jesus Christ to confer inward grace. In more basic terms, it is a rite that is performed to convey God’s grace to the recipient, through the power of the Holy Spirit.
Like all the sacraments, holy anointing was instituted by Jesus Christ during his earthly ministry. The Catechism explains, "This sacred anointing of the sick was instituted by Christ our Lord as a true and proper sacrament of the New Testament. It is alluded to indeed by Mark, but is recommended to the faithful and promulgated by James the apostle and brother of the Lord" (CCC 1511; Mark 6:13; Jas. 5:14-15).

The anointing of the sick conveys several graces and imparts gifts of strengthening in the Holy Spirit against anxiety, discouragement, and temptation, and conveys peace and fortitude (CCC 1520). These graces flow from the atoning death of Jesus Christ, for "this was to fulfill what was spoken by the prophet Isaiah, ‘He took our infirmities and bore our diseases’" (Matt. 8:17).

Mark refers to the sacrament when he recounts how Jesus sent out the twelve disciples to preach, and "they cast out many demons, and anointed with oil many that were sick and healed them" (Mark 6:13). In his epistle, James says, "Is any among you sick? Let him call for the elders of the church, and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord; and the prayer of faith will save the sick man, and the Lord will raise him up; and if he has committed sins, he will be forgiven" (Jas. 5:14–15).

6. Holy Matrimony - When Jesus came, he elevated matrimony to the same status it had originally possessed between Adam and Eve—the status of a sacrament. Thus, any valid marriage between two baptized people is a sacramental marriage and, once consummated, cannot be dissolved. Jesus, therefore, taught that if anyone so married divorces and remarries, that person is living in perpetual adultery, a state of mortal sin.

He said, "Every one who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he who marries a woman divorced from her husband commits adultery" (Luke 16:18; cf. Mark 10:11–12).

7. Holy Orders -Jesus Christ gave full authority to the Apostles when in Lk 10:16, He said, "He who hears you, hears Me; and he who rejects you, rejects Me; and he who rejects Me, rejects Him who sent Me." We hear His words through His Church. Therefore these words have to apply to His Church as well, 'he who rejects My Church rejects Me'. That verse also prevents the Pope from teaching heresy, so when the Pope speaks in matters of faith and morals, he is speaking as Christ would and with His authority. Paul acknowledged the authority given to the Apostles in 2Cor 10:8, "For even if I boast somewhat more about our authority, which the Lord has given for your upbuilding, and not for your destruction, I shall not be put to shame."

Jesus gave authority to 72 other disciples in Lk 10:1-12, and told them He sends them forth as 'lambs in the midst of wolves'. He told them to shake the dust off their feet from the towns that do not receive them.

Knowing of course, that the Apostles would not live forever, and that His Church would continue until the 'end of time'
(Mt 28:20), Jesus Christ made provision to pass on the authority from generation to generation...
"I laid the foundation, and another builds thereon. But let everyone take care how he builds thereon, for other foundations no one can lay, but that which has been laid, which is Jesus Christ." 1Cor 3:10-11. So there will be followers who will build upon the foundation.

2. "You have not chosen Me, but I have chosen you, and have appointed you that you should go and bear fruit, and that your fruit should remain...," Jn 15:16.

3. "...that you should set right anything that is defective and should appoint presbyters (priests) in every city as I myself directed you to do," Titus 1:5. Paul commands them to make new priests.

4. "Take heed to yourselves and to the whole flock in which the Holy Spirit has placed you as Bishops to rule the Church of GOD," Acts 20:28. Here the Bishops are given the authority by the Holy Spirit to rule the Church that Jesus Christ founded.

5. "And now I commend you to GOD and to the word of His grace, who is able to build up and to give the inheritance among all the sanctified," Acts 20:32. Pass on the authority to your heirs.

6. The Pope and the Bishops are the lawful successors to the Apostles. If we reject their authority, then we reject Christ.
 

Doubting Thomas

Active Member
In John 6:63, Christ said to words I speak to you are "spirit", not the words I speak to you are "symbol" or "metaphor". In this way, and in context with the rest of the passage (and the rest of Scripture), Christ is speaking of receiving His Body and Blood in the Eucharist through the eyes of faith as opposed to the two extremes of crass literal cannibalism on one hand (as the unbelieving Jews understood Him), and mere metaphor on the other (as the Zwinglians and their modern-day followers would mistakenly believe).
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by Briony-Gloriana:
[QB] As usual Bob has gone on and on about a selected biblical quote which his denomination has seen fit to exclude from the Bible and ignores the fact there were several other quotes cited.

It seems to me that it is a case I will select what I am comfortable with Lord but I will ignore what I WILL not.
I see that you do that - but I can't explain why.

As for "other texts" -- you have yet to respond to the devastating case made against the RC doctrinal position from the "details" of 2Macc2.
(Ignoring the inconvenient facts in favor of holding on to a good story?)

AT this point - the record shows that no text has been offerred SHOWING prayers TO the dead or prayers FOR THE dead in the 66 books of scripture.

OF the ONE text (and there has been only one) put forward by the RC posters for a prayer offerred FOR The DEAD - it was SHOWN in the DETAILS of that quote (2MACC) that even the RCC would deny it because it is praing FOR those who have died with mortal sin (idolarty - worhsip of pagan gods). It was ALSO shown that EVEN there those praying FOR The dead ADMIT that their prayers have no value at all to the dead WHILE DEAD!

"details details".

In any case - I thank you for being willing to discuss facts even if at a great distance.

When you have an objective moment - why not pass on the points raised about 2Macc and see if anyone in your sphere of contacts can actually address the points? It would be nice to see someone to take an honest shot at responding.

(Not arguing that you are not honest - just pointing out that your interest has been more along the lines of being "defensive no matter what" rather than dealing with the points made. For the sake of dialog and communication it would still be nice to see an RC source "carefully and objectively respond")

In Christ,

Bob
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Originally posted by Doubting Thomas:
In John 6:63, Christ said to words I speak to you are "spirit", not the words I speak to you are "symbol" or "metaphor". In this way, and in context with the rest of the passage (and the rest of Scripture), Christ is speaking of receiving His Body and Blood in the Eucharist through the eyes of faith as opposed to the two extremes of crass literal cannibalism on one hand (as the unbelieving Jews understood Him), and mere metaphor on the other (as the Zwinglians and their modern-day followers would mistakenly believe).
You seem to be confused. Is it not obvious that the metaphorical words that he spoke (symbolical words) had obvious spiritual meaning? Did not every parable that Jesus taught give out teach spiritual truth? Why is it so hard to see that Jesus teaches spiritual truth in symbolical language. Or, are you a gnostic claiming to have some spiritual knowledge that no one else can attain to because you alone have the key to this spiritual truth??
DHK
 

Doubting Thomas

Active Member
Originally posted by DHK:
You seem to be confused. Is it not obvious that the metaphorical words that he spoke (symbolical words) had obvious spiritual meaning?
It's obvious to me and countless others including the Christians for the first 1500 years that Christ meant "eat my flesh and drink my blood" to be more than just mere metaphor. It's you who are confused by making a false dichotomy, assuming that if Christ wasn't talking about cannibalism here he must only be talking metaphorically.

Did not every parable that Jesus taught give out teach spiritual truth? Why is it so hard to see that Jesus teaches spiritual truth in symbolical language.
But with the parables he would explain the meaning later. In the John 6 discourse he gets more and more literal when talking to the Jews and at the Last Supper the disciples learned that the bread and wine was the means by which they communed with ("ate and drank") His Body and Blood. (I Cor 10:16)
Or, are you a gnostic claiming to have some spiritual knowledge that no one else can attain to because you alone have the key to this spiritual truth??
Not at all. In fact it was only the gnostics in the early history of the church who denied the real presence. (Just read the writings of Ignatius or Irenaeus...or some of the gnostics own statements for proof). The Real Presence was common knowledge to all Baptized Christians.
 

D28guy

New Member
Living4Him,

"1. Baptism - Few truths are so clearly taught in the New Testament as the doctrine that in baptism God gives us grace. Again and again the sacred writers tell us that it is in baptism that we are saved, buried with Christ, incorporated into his body, washed of our sins, regenerated, cleansed, and so on (see Acts 2:38, 22:16; Rom. 6:1–4; 1 Cor. 6:11, 12:13; Gal. 3:26–27; Eph. 5:25-27; Col. 2:11–12; Titus 3:5; 1 Pet. 3:18–22).

John 3:5, Jesus says, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God."

The great commission in Matthew 28:19: "Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit."

2. Penance - "If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just, and will forgive our sins and cleanse us from all unrighteousness" (1 John 1:9). Minor or venial sins can be confessed directly to God, but for grave or mortal sins, which crush the spiritual life out of the soul, God has instituted a different means for obtaining forgiveness—the sacrament known popularly as confession, penance, or reconciliation.

This sacrament is rooted in the mission God gave to Christ in his capacity as the Son of man on earth to go and forgive sins (cf. Matt. 9:6). Thus, the crowds who witnessed this new power "glorified God, who had given such authority to men" (Matt. 9:8; note the plural "men"). After his resurrection, Jesus passed on his mission to forgive sins to his ministers, telling them, "As the Father has sent me, even so I send you. . . . Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained" (John 20:21–23).

3. Confirmation - The sacrament of confirmation is found in Bible passages such as Acts 8:14–17, 9:17, 19:6, and Hebrews 6:2, which speak of a laying on of hands for the purpose of bestowing the Holy Spirit.

Hebrews 6:2 is especially important because it is not a narrative account of how confirmation was given and, thus, cannot be dismissed by those who reject the sacrament as something unique to the apostolic age. In fact, the passage refers to confirmation as one of Christianity’s basic teachings, which is to be expected since confirmation, like baptism, is a sacrament of initiation into the Christian life.

We read: "Therefore let us leave the elementary teachings of Christ and go on to maturity, not laying again the foundation of repentance from acts that lead to death, and of faith in God, instruction about baptisms, the laying on of hands, the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment" (Heb. 6:1–2).

4. Holy Eucharist - John 6:30 begins a colloquy that took place in the synagogue at Capernaum. The Jews asked Jesus what sign he could perform so that they might believe in him. As a challenge, they noted that "our ancestors ate manna in the desert." Could Jesus top that? He told them the real bread from heaven comes from the Father. "Give us this bread always," they said. Jesus replied, "I am the bread of life; whoever comes to me will never hunger, and whoever believes in me will never thirst." At this point the Jews understood him to be speaking metaphorically.
Jesus first repeated what he said, then summarized: "‘I am the living bread which came down from heaven; if any one eats of this bread, he will live for ever; and the bread which I shall give for the life of the world is my flesh.’ The Jews then disputed among themselves, saying, ‘How can this man give us his flesh to eat?’" (John 6:51–52).

His listeners were stupefied because now they understood Jesus literally—and correctly. He again repeated his words, but with even greater emphasis, and introduced the statement about drinking his blood: "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him" (John 6:53–56).
Notice that Jesus made no attempt to soften what he said, no attempt to correct "misunderstandings," for there were none. Our Lord’s listeners understood him perfectly well. They no longer thought he was speaking metaphorically. If they had, if they mistook what he said, why no correction?

On other occasions when there was confusion, Christ explained just what he meant (cf. Matt. 16:5–12). Here, where any misunderstanding would be fatal, there was no effort by Jesus to correct. Instead, he repeated himself for greater emphasis.

In John 6:60 we read: "Many of his disciples, when they heard it, said, ‘This is a hard saying; who can listen to it?’" These were his disciples, people used to his remarkable ways. He warned them not to think carnally, but spiritually: "It is the Spirit that gives life, the flesh is of no avail; the words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life" (John 6:63; cf. 1 Cor. 2:12–14).

But he knew some did not believe. (It is here, in the rejection of the Eucharist, that Judas fell away; look at John 6:64.) "After this, many of his disciples drew back and no longer went about with him" (John 6:66).


5. Anointing of the Sick - The anointing of the sick is administered to bring spiritual and even physical strength during an illness, especially near the time of death. It is most likely one of the last sacraments one will receive. A sacrament is an outward sign established by Jesus Christ to confer inward grace. In more basic terms, it is a rite that is performed to convey God’s grace to the recipient, through the power of the Holy Spirit.
Like all the sacraments, holy anointing was instituted by Jesus Christ during his earthly ministry. The Catechism explains, "This sacred anointing of the sick was instituted by Christ our Lord as a true and proper sacrament of the New Testament. It is alluded to indeed by Mark, but is recommended to the faithful and promulgated by James the apostle and brother of the Lord" (CCC 1511; Mark 6:13; Jas. 5:14-15).

The anointing of the sick conveys several graces and imparts gifts of strengthening in the Holy Spirit against anxiety, discouragement, and temptation, and conveys peace and fortitude (CCC 1520). These graces flow from the atoning death of Jesus Christ, for "this was to fulfill what was spoken by the prophet Isaiah, ‘He took our infirmities and bore our diseases’" (Matt. 8:17).

Mark refers to the sacrament when he recounts how Jesus sent out the twelve disciples to preach, and "they cast out many demons, and anointed with oil many that were sick and healed them" (Mark 6:13). In his epistle, James says, "Is any among you sick? Let him call for the elders of the church, and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord; and the prayer of faith will save the sick man, and the Lord will raise him up; and if he has committed sins, he will be forgiven" (Jas. 5:14–15).

6. Holy Matrimony - When Jesus came, he elevated matrimony to the same status it had originally possessed between Adam and Eve—the status of a sacrament. Thus, any valid marriage between two baptized people is a sacramental marriage and, once consummated, cannot be dissolved. Jesus, therefore, taught that if anyone so married divorces and remarries, that person is living in perpetual adultery, a state of mortal sin.

He said, "Every one who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he who marries a woman divorced from her husband commits adultery" (Luke 16:18; cf. Mark 10:11–12).

7. Holy Orders -Jesus Christ gave full authority to the Apostles when in Lk 10:16, He said, "He who hears you, hears Me; and he who rejects you, rejects Me; and he who rejects Me, rejects Him who sent Me." We hear His words through His Church. Therefore these words have to apply to His Church as well, 'he who rejects My Church rejects Me'. That verse also prevents the Pope from teaching heresy, so when the Pope speaks in matters of faith and morals, he is speaking as Christ would and with His authority. Paul acknowledged the authority given to the Apostles in 2Cor 10:8, "For even if I boast somewhat more about our authority, which the Lord has given for your upbuilding, and not for your destruction, I shall not be put to shame."

Jesus gave authority to 72 other disciples in Lk 10:1-12, and told them He sends them forth as 'lambs in the midst of wolves'. He told them to shake the dust off their feet from the towns that do not receive them.

Knowing of course, that the Apostles would not live forever, and that His Church would continue until the 'end of time'
(Mt 28:20), Jesus Christ made provision to pass on the authority from generation to generation...
"I laid the foundation, and another builds thereon. But let everyone take care how he builds thereon, for other foundations no one can lay, but that which has been laid, which is Jesus Christ." 1Cor 3:10-11. So there will be followers who will build upon the foundation.

2. "You have not chosen Me, but I have chosen you, and have appointed you that you should go and bear fruit, and that your fruit should remain...," Jn 15:16.

3. "...that you should set right anything that is defective and should appoint presbyters (priests) in every city as I myself directed you to do," Titus 1:5. Paul commands them to make new priests.

4. "Take heed to yourselves and to the whole flock in which the Holy Spirit has placed you as Bishops to rule the Church of GOD," Acts 20:28. Here the Bishops are given the authority by the Holy Spirit to rule the Church that Jesus Christ founded.

5. "And now I commend you to GOD and to the word of His grace, who is able to build up and to give the inheritance among all the sanctified," Acts 20:32. Pass on the authority to your heirs."
The degree to wich the Catholic Church mangles and mutilates the scriptures in order to shoe-horn their dangerous and cultic practices into them is nothing less than absolutly stunning.

"6. The Pope and the Bishops are the lawful successors to the Apostles. If we reject their authority, then we reject Christ."
That is precisely what the Jehovahs Witness believe about the Watchtower publications, since they refer to their organisation as Gods only "Spirit led organisation" on earth.

The idea being perpetuated in that last quote is 100% Satanic to the core. It is a way to keep people in fear and bondage to whatever group is perpetuation the lie.

Here it is again:

The Catholic Church says...

"6. The Pope and the Bishops are the lawful successors to the Apostles. If we reject their authority, then we reject Christ."
Yet Almighty God says...

"Stand fast therefore in the freedom by wich God has made us free, and do not entangled again in the yoke of bondage"

Very sadly,

Mike
 

Living4Him

New Member
The degree to wich the Catholic Church mangles and mutilates the scriptures in order to shoe-horn their dangerous and cultic practices into them is nothing less than absolutly stunning
No, they actually take God at His Word.

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"6. The Pope and the Bishops are the lawful successors to the Apostles. If we reject their authority, then we reject Christ."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yet Almighty God says...

"Stand fast therefore in the freedom by wich God has made us free, and do not entangled again in the yoke of bondage"

Very sadly,

Mike
And Jesus also said, Luke 10:16
He that heareth you heareth Me; and he that despiseth you despiseth Me; and he that despiseth Me despiseth Him that sent Me.

Also, your quote is taken out of context. Paul is speaking of the bondage of sin and the Law.

Gal.5:13 For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.


Oh yes, let's not forget that the Sermon on the Mount is the Savior's own commentary on the Ten Commandments. He explained how much more is expected of those who believe in Him, far beyond the demands of the original Decalogue.
 

D28guy

New Member
Living4Him,

"Also, your quote is taken out of context. Paul is speaking of the bondage of sin and the Law."
I am using the scriptures IN context.

The Catholic Church proclaims a works justification system. That is the essence of legalism, or keeping people under the law.

And they use their version of lawkeeping to keep their people in bondage to their organisation.

A works justification system, fear and lawkeeping.

Those 3 went hand in hand at that time...and today.

Catholic Church...

"The Pope and the Bishops are the lawful successors to the Apostles. If we reject their authority, then we reject Christ."
Almighty God...

"Stand fast therefore in the freedom by wich God has made us free, and do not entangled again in the yoke of bondage"
God bless,

Mike
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Originally posted by Doubting Thomas:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by DHK:
You seem to be confused. Is it not obvious that the metaphorical words that he spoke (symbolical words) had obvious spiritual meaning?
It's obvious to me and countless others including the Christians for the first 1500 years that Christ meant "eat my flesh and drink my blood" to be more than just mere metaphor. It's you who are confused by making a false dichotomy, assuming that if Christ wasn't talking about cannibalism here he must only be talking metaphorically.</font>[/QUOTE]And what other choice do we have? Either the passage is literal or it is not. If it neither one of these then one can only conclude that you are a gnostic with some special higher knowledge. Please let us know. If it is not literal it obviously symbolic, and was spoken as a metaphor. There remains no other choice.

Did not every parable that Jesus taught give out teach spiritual truth? Why is it so hard to see that Jesus teaches spiritual truth in symbolical language.
But with the parables he would explain the meaning later.
Not true. He did with some of the parables, not with all of them. For example:

Matthew 13:44-50 Again, the kingdom of heaven is like unto treasure hid in a field; the which when a man hath found, he hideth, and for joy thereof goeth and selleth all that he hath, and buyeth that field.
45 Again, the kingdom of heaven is like unto a merchant man, seeking goodly pearls:
46 Who, when he had found one pearl of great price, went and sold all that he had, and bought it.
47 Again, the kingdom of heaven is like unto a net, that was cast into the sea, and gathered of every kind:
48 Which, when it was full, they drew to shore, and sat down, and gathered the good into vessels, but cast the bad away.
49 So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just,
50 And shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.

Where is the interpretation of all of these parables? Let me give you a hint. There is none.

In the John 6 discourse he gets more and more literal when talking to the Jews and at the Last Supper the disciples learned that the bread and wine was the means by which they communed with ("ate and drank") His Body and Blood. (I Cor 10:16)
You are entitled to your opinion; but it is wrong. Jesus never got literal at all. I already demonstrated that for you. He used symbolic and metaphoric language stratight through the whole chapter. And now you suddenly want to change the end of the chapter to a literal interpretation in order to accomodate a Catholic transubstantiation. What kind of dreadful exposition is that! It is not rightfully dividing the Word of Truth, as Paul commanded us to do. We don't "eat" his body, and "drink" his blood. Are you a vampire by chance? When are you going to demonstrate these things for me? I want hard evidence of the cannibalistic nature of your eating and drinking of the body and blood of Christ, as you say you take this passage literally. How Gross!! How entirely against the context of this passage does this go.
Tell me John, have you become a Catholic?

Or, are you a gnostic claiming to have some spiritual knowledge that no one else can attain to because you alone have the key to this spiritual truth??
Not at all. In fact it was only the gnostics in the early history of the church who denied the real presence. (Just read the writings of Ignatius or Irenaeus...or some of the gnostics own statements for proof). The Real Presence was common knowledge to all Baptized Christians.
This is a false statement. Many of the early church fathers denied transubstantiation, just as they denied baptismal regeneration. Do you fall into the trap of believing History revised by the Catholics? It matters not what some of the church fathers believed:
Like Ireneus who believed that Christ lived to the ripe old age of 80.
Like Origen who is labeled by some as the Father of Arianism, and even then was labeled as an heretic.
Many of the church fathers held to heretical beliefs.
With Augustine originated the allegorical method of interpreting the Bible, as well as hyper-Calvinism. He is the darling star of the Catholics.

Our sole authority of faith and practice resides in the Bible alone, not in the fanciful opinions of men's imaginations.
DHK
 

Living4Him

New Member
Many of the early church fathers denied transubstantiation,
Ignatius roundly declares that . . . [t]he bread is the flesh of Jesus, the cup his blood.

Irenaeus teaches that the bread and wine are really the Lord’s body and blood. His witness is, indeed, all the more impressive because he produces it quite incidentally while refuting the Gnostic and Docetic rejection of the Lord’s real humanity.

Ignatius of Antioch

"I have no taste for corruptible food nor for the pleasures of this life. I desire the bread of God, which is the flesh of Jesus Christ, who was of the seed of David; and for drink I desire his blood, which is love incorruptible" (Letter to the Romans 7:3 [A.D. 110]).

"Take note of those who hold heterodox opinions on the grace of Jesus Christ which has come to us, and see how contrary their opinions are to the mind of God. . . . They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer because they do not confess that the Eucharist is the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, flesh which suffered for our sins and which that Father, in his goodness, raised up again. They who deny the gift of God are perishing in their disputes" (Letter to the Smyrnaeans 6:2–7:1 [A.D. 110]).

Justin Martyr

"We call this food Eucharist, and no one else is permitted to partake of it, except one who believes our teaching to be true and who has been washed in the washing which is for the remission of sins and for regeneration [i.e., has received baptism] and is thereby living as Christ enjoined. For not as common bread nor common drink do we receive these; but since Jesus Christ our Savior was made incarnate by the word of God and had both flesh and blood for our salvation, so too, as we have been taught, the food which has been made into the Eucharist by the Eucharistic prayer set down by him, and by the change of which our blood and flesh is nurtured, is both the flesh and the blood of that incarnated Jesus" (First Apology 66 [A.D. 151]).

Irenaeus

"If the Lord were from other than the Father, how could he rightly take bread, which is of the same creation as our own, and confess it to be his body and affirm that the mixture in the cup is his blood?" (Against Heresies 4:33–32 [A.D. 189]).

"He has declared the cup, a part of creation, to be his own blood, from which he causes our blood to flow; and the bread, a part of creation, he has established as his own body, from which he gives increase unto our bodies. When, therefore, the mixed cup [wine and water] and the baked bread receives the Word of God and becomes the Eucharist, the body of Christ, and from these the substance of our flesh is increased and supported, how can they say that the flesh is not capable of receiving the gift of God, which is eternal life—flesh which is nourished by the body and blood of the Lord, and is in fact a member of him?" (ibid., 5:2).


Clement of Alexandria

"’Eat my flesh,’ [Jesus] says, ‘and drink my blood.’ The Lord supplies us with these intimate nutrients, he delivers over his flesh and pours out his blood, and nothing is lacking for the growth of his children" (The Instructor of Children 1:6:43:3 [A.D. 191]).


Tertullian

"[T]here is not a soul that can at all procure salvation, except it believe whilst it is in the flesh, so true is it that the flesh is the very condition on which salvation hinges. And since the soul is, in consequence of its salvation, chosen to the service of God, it is the flesh which actually renders it capable of such service. The flesh, indeed, is washed [in baptism], in order that the soul may be cleansed . . . the flesh is shadowed with the imposition of hands [in confirmation], that the soul also may be illuminated by the Spirit; the flesh feeds [in the Eucharist] on the body and blood of Christ, that the soul likewise may be filled with God" (The Resurrection of the Dead 8 [A.D. 210]).


Hippolytus

"‘And she [Wisdom] has furnished her table’ [Prov. 9:2] . . . refers to his [Christ’s] honored and undefiled body and blood, which day by day are administered and offered sacrificially at the spiritual divine table, as a memorial of that first and ever-memorable table of the spiritual divine supper [i.e.,
the Last Supper]" (Fragment from Commentary on Proverbs [A.D. 217]).


Origen

"Formerly there was baptism in an obscure way . . . now, however, in full view, there is regeneration in water and in the Holy Spirit. Formerly, in an obscure way, there was manna for food; now, however, in full view, there is the true food, the flesh of the Word of God, as he himself says: ‘My flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink’ [John 6:55]" (Homilies on Numbers 7:2 [A.D. 248]).


Cyprian of Carthage

"He [Paul] threatens, moreover, the stubborn and forward, and denounces them, saying, ‘Whosoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord unworthily, is guilty of the body and blood of the Lord’ [1 Cor. 11:27]. All these warnings being scorned and contemned—[lapsed Christians will often take Communion] before their sin is expiated, before confession has been made of their crime, before their conscience has been purged by sacrifice and by the hand of the priest, before the offense of an angry and threatening Lord has been appeased, [and so] violence is done to his body and blood; and they sin now against their Lord more with their hand and mouth than when they denied their Lord" (The Lapsed 15–16 [A.D. 251]).


Council of Nicaea I

"It has come to the knowledge of the holy and great synod that, in some districts and cities, the deacons administer the Eucharist to the presbyters [i.e., priests], whereas neither canon nor custom permits that they who have no right to offer [the Eucharistic sacrifice] should give the Body of Christ to them that do offer [it]" (Canon 18 [A.D. 325]).


Aphraahat the Persian Sage

"After having spoken thus [at the Last Supper], the Lord rose up from the place where he had made the Passover and had given his body as food and his blood as drink, and he went with his disciples to the place where he was to be arrested. But he ate of his own body and drank of his own blood, while he was pondering on the dead. With his own hands the Lord presented his own body to be eaten, and before he was crucified he gave his blood as drink" (Treatises 12:6 [A.D. 340]).


Cyril of Jerusalem

"The bread and the wine of the Eucharist before the holy invocation of the adorable Trinity were simple bread and wine, but the invocation having been made, the bread becomes the body of Christ and the wine the blood of Christ" (Catechetical Lectures 19:7 [A.D. 350]).

"Do not, therefore, regard the bread and wine as simply that; for they are, according to the Master’s declaration, the body and blood of Christ. Even though the senses suggest to you the other, let faith make you firm. Do not judge in this matter by taste, but be fully assured by the faith, not doubting that you have been deemed worthy of the body and blood of Christ. . . . [Since you are] fully convinced that the apparent bread is not bread, even though it is sensible to the taste, but the body of Christ, and that the apparent wine is not wine, even though the taste would have it so, . . . partake of that bread as something spiritual, and put a cheerful face on your soul" (ibid., 22:6, 9).


Ambrose of Milan

"Perhaps you may be saying, ‘I see something else; how can you assure me that I am receiving the body of Christ?’ It but remains for us to prove it. And how many are the examples we might use! . . . Christ is in that sacrament, because it is the body of Christ" (The Mysteries 9:50, 58 [A.D. 390]).


Theodore of Mopsuestia

"When [Christ] gave the bread he did not say, ‘This is the symbol of my body,’ but, ‘This is my body.’ In the same way, when he gave the cup of his blood he did not say, ‘This is the symbol of my blood,’ but, ‘This is my blood’; for he wanted us to look upon the [Eucharistic elements] after their reception of grace and the coming of the Holy Spirit not according to their nature, but receive them as they are, the body and blood of our Lord. We ought . . . not regard [the elements] merely as bread and cup, but as the body and blood of the Lord, into which they were transformed by the descent of the Holy Spirit" (Catechetical Homilies 5:1 [A.D. 405]).


Augustine

"Christ was carried in his own hands when, referring to his own body, he said, ‘This is my body’ [Matt. 26:26]. For he carried that body in his hands" (Explanations of the Psalms 33:1:10 [A.D. 405]).

"I promised you [new Christians], who have now been baptized, a sermon in which I would explain the sacrament of the Lord’s Table. . . . That bread which you see on the altar, having been sanctified by the word of God, is the body of Christ. That chalice, or rather, what is in that chalice, having been sanctified by the word of God, is the blood of Christ" (Sermons 227 [A.D. 411]).

...

"What you see is the bread and the chalice; that is what your own eyes report to you. But what your faith obliges you to accept is that the bread is the body of Christ and the chalice is the blood of Christ. This has been said very briefly, which may perhaps be sufficient for faith; yet faith does not desire instruction" (ibid., 272).


Council of Ephesus

"We will necessarily add this also. Proclaiming the death, according to the flesh, of the only-begotten Son of God, that is Jesus Christ, confessing his resurrection from the dead, and his ascension into heaven, we offer the unbloody sacrifice in the churches, and so go on to the mystical thanksgivings, and are sanctified, having received his holy flesh and the precious blood of Christ the Savior of us all. And not as common flesh do we receive it; God forbid: nor as of a man sanctified and associated with the Word according to the unity of worth, or as having a divine indwelling, but as truly the life-giving and very flesh of the Word himself. For he is the life according to his nature as God, and when he became united to his flesh, he made it also to be life-giving" (Session 1, Letter of Cyril to Nestorius [A.D. 431]).
 

Living4Him

New Member
just as they denied baptismal regeneration.
Born Again in Baptism

Justin Martyr

"As many as are persuaded and believe that what we [Christians] teach and say is true, and undertake to be able to live accordingly, and instructed to pray and to entreat God with fasting, for the remission of their sins that are past, we pray and fast with them. Then they are brought by us where there is water and are regenerated in the same manner in which we were ourselves regenerated. For, in the name of God, the Father . . . and of our Savior Jesus Christ, and of the Holy Spirit [Matt. 28:19], they then receive the washing with water. For Christ also said, ‘Unless you are born again, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven’ [John 3:3]" (First Apology 61 [A.D. 151]).


Irenaeus

"‘And [Naaman] dipped himself . . . seven times in the Jordan’ [2 Kgs. 5:14]. It was not for nothing that Naaman of old, when suffering from leprosy, was purified upon his being baptized, but [this served] as an indication to us. For as we are lepers in sin, we are made clean, by means of the sacred water and the invocation of the Lord, from our old transgressions, being spiritually regenerated as newborn babes, even as the Lord has declared: ‘Except a man be born again through water and the Spirit, he shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven’" (Fragment 34 [A.D. 190]).


Tertullian

"[N]o one can attain salvation without baptism, especially in view of the declaration of the Lord, who says, ‘Unless a man shall be born of water, he shall not have life’" (Baptism 12:1 [A.D. 203]).


Hippolytus

"The Father of immortality sent the immortal Son and Word into the world, who came to man in order to wash him with water and the Spirit; and he, begetting us again to incorruption of soul and body, breathed into us the Spirit of life, and endued us with an incorruptible panoply. If, therefore, man has become immortal, he will also be God. And if he is made God by water and the Holy Spirit after the regeneration of the laver he is found to be also joint-heir with Christ after the resurrection from the dead. Wherefore I preach to this effect: Come, all ye kindreds of the nations, to the immortality of the baptism" (Discourse on the Holy Theophany 8 [A.D. 217]).


The Recognitions of Clement

"But you will perhaps say, ‘What does the baptism of water contribute toward the worship of God?’ In the first place, because that which has pleased God is fulfilled. In the second place, because when you are regenerated and born again of water and of God, the frailty of your former birth, which you have through men, is cut off, and so . . . you shall be able to attain salvation; but otherwise it is impossible. For thus has the true prophet [Jesus] testified to us with an oath: ‘Verily, I say to you, that unless a man is born again of water . . . he shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven’" (The Recognitions of Clement 6:9 [A.D. 221]).


Testimonies Concerning the Jews

"That unless a man have been baptized and born again, he cannot attain unto the kingdom of God. In the Gospel according to John: ‘Except a man be born again of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God’ [John 3:5]. . . . Also in the same place: ‘Unless ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye shall not have life in you’ [John 6:53]. That it is of small account to be baptized and to receive the Eucharist, unless one profit by it both in deeds and works" (Testimonies Concerning the Jews 3:2:25–26 [A.D. 240]).


Cyprian of Carthage


"[When] they receive also the baptism of the Church . . . then finally can they be fully sanctified and be the sons of God . . . since it is written, ‘Except a man be born again of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God’" (Letters 71[72]:1 [A.D. 253]).


Council of Carthage VII

"And in the gospel our Lord Jesus Christ spoke with his divine voice, saying, ‘Except a man be born again of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God.’ . . . Unless therefore they receive saving baptism in the Catholic Church, which is one, they cannot be saved, but will be condemned with the carnal in the judgment of the Lord Christ" (Seventh Carthage [A.D. 256]).


Cyril of Jerusalem

"Since man is of a twofold nature, composed of body and soul, the purification also is twofold: the corporeal for the corporeal and the incorporeal for the incorporeal. The water cleanses the body, and the Spirit seals the soul. . . . When you go down into the water, then, regard not simply the water, but look for salvation through the power of the Spirit. For without both you cannot attain to perfection. It is not I who says this, but the Lord Jesus Christ, who has the power in this matter. And he says, ‘Unless a man be born again,’ and he adds the words ‘of water and of the Spirit,’ ‘he cannot enter the kingdom of God.’ He that is baptized with water, but is not found worthy of the Spirit, does not receive the grace in perfection. Nor, if a man be virtuous in his deeds, but does not receive the seal by means of the water, shall he enter the kingdom of heaven. A bold saying, but not mine; for it is Jesus who has declared it" (Catechetical Lectures 3:4 [A.D. 350]).


Athanasius

"[A]s we are all from earth and die in Adam, so being regenerated from above of water and Spirit, in the Christ we are all quickened" (Four Discourses Against the Arians 3:26[33] [A.D. 360]).


Basil the Great

"This then is what it means to be ‘born again of water and Spirit’: Just as our dying is effected in the water [Rom. 6:3; Col. 2:12–13], our living is wrought through the Spirit. In three immersions and an equal number of invocations the great mystery of baptism is completed in such a way that the type of death may be shown figuratively, and that by the handing on of divine knowledge the souls of the baptized may be illuminated. If, therefore, there is any grace in the water, it is not from the nature of water, but from the Spirit’s presence there" (The Holy Spirit 15:35 [A.D. 375]).


Ambrose of Milan

"Although we are baptized with water and the Spirit, the latter is much superior to the former, and is not therefore to be separated from the Father and the Son. There are, however, many who, because we are baptized with water and the Spirit, think that there is no difference in the offices of water and the Spirit, and therefore think that they do not differ in nature. Nor do they observe that we are buried in the element of water that we may rise again renewed by the Spirit. For in the water is the representation of death, in the Spirit is the pledge of life, that the body of sin may die through the water, which encloses the body as it were in a kind of tomb, that we, by the power of the Spirit, may be renewed from the death of sin, being born again in God" (The Holy Spirit 1:6[75–76] [A.D. 381]).

"The Church was redeemed at the price of Christ’s blood. Jew or Greek, it makes no difference; but if he has believed, he must circumcise himself from his sins [in baptism (Col. 2:11–12)] so that he can be saved . . . for no one ascends into the kingdom of heaven except through the sacrament of baptism.
. . . ‘Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God’" (Abraham 2:11:79–84 [A.D. 387]).

"You have read, therefore, that the three witnesses in baptism are one: water, blood, and the Spirit (1 John 5:8): And if you withdraw any one of these, the sacrament of baptism is not valid. For what is the water without the cross of Christ? A common element with no sacramental effect. Nor on the other hand is there any mystery of regeneration without water, for ‘unless a man be born again of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God’" (The Mysteries 4:20 [A.D. 390]).


Gregory of Nyssa

"[In] the birth by water and the Spirit, [Jesus] himself led the way in this birth, drawing down upon the water, by his own baptism, the Holy Spirit; so that in all things he became the firstborn of those who are spiritually born again, and gave the name of brethren to those who partook in a birth like to his own by water and the Spirit" (Against Eunomius 2:8 [A.D. 382]).


John Chrysostom

"[N]o one can enter into the kingdom of heaven except he be regenerated through water and the Spirit, and he who does not eat the flesh of the Lord and drink his blood is excluded from eternal life, and if all these things are accomplished only by means of those holy hands, I mean the hands of the priest, how will any one, without these, be able to escape the fire of hell, or to win those crowns which are reserved for the victorious? These [priests] truly are they who are entrusted with the pangs of spiritual travail and the birth which comes through baptism: by their means we put on Christ, and are buried with the Son of God, and become members of that blessed head [the Mystical Body of Christ]" (The Priesthood 3:5–6 [A.D. 387]).


Gregory of Nazianz

"Such is the grace and power of baptism; not an overwhelming of the world as of old, but a purification of the sins of each individual, and a complete cleansing from all the bruises and stains of sin. And since we are double-made, I mean of body and soul, and the one part is visible, the other invisible, so the cleansing also is twofold, by water and the Spirit; the one received visibly in the body, the other concurring with it invisibly and apart from the body; the one typical, the other real and cleansing the depths" (Oration on Holy Baptism 7–8 [A.D. 388]).


The Apostolic Constitutions

"Be ye likewise contented with one baptism alone, that which is into the death of the Lord [Rom. 6:3; Col. 2:12–13]. . . . [H]e that out of contempt will not be baptized shall be condemned as an unbeliever and shall be reproached as ungrateful and foolish. For the Lord says, ‘Except a man be baptized of water and of the Spirit, he shall by no means enter into the kingdom of heaven.’ And again, ‘He that believes and is baptized shall be saved, but he that believes not shall be damned’" [Mark 16:16] (Apostolic Constitutions 6:3:15 [A.D. 400]).


Augustine

"It is this one Spirit who makes it possible for an infant to be regenerated . . . when that infant is brought to baptism; and it is through this one Spirit that the infant so presented is reborn. For it is not written, ‘Unless a man be born again by the will of his parents’ or ‘by the faith of those presenting him or ministering to him,’ but, ‘Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit.’ The water, therefore, manifesting exteriorly the sacrament of grace, and the Spirit effecting interiorly the benefit of grace, both regenerate in one Christ that man who was generated in Adam" (Letters 98:2 [A.D. 412]).

"Those who, though they have not received the washing of regeneration, die for the confession of Christ—it avails them just as much for the forgiveness of their sins as if they had been washed in the sacred font of baptism. For he that said, ‘If anyone is not reborn of water and the Spirit, he will not enter the kingdom of heaven,’ made an exception for them in that other statement in which he says no less generally, ‘Whoever confesses me before men, I too will confess him before my Father, who is in heaven’" [Matt. 10:32] (The City of God 13:7 [A.D. 419]).

Protestant early Church historian J. N. D. Kelly writes, "From the beginning baptism was the
universally accepted rite of admission to the Church. . . . As regards its significance, it was always held to convey the remission of sins.
 

Living4Him

New Member
What kind of dreadful exposition is that! It is not rightfully dividing the Word of Truth, as Paul commanded us to do. We don't "eat" his body, and "drink" his blood. Are you a vampire by chance? When are you going to demonstrate these things for me? I want hard evidence of the cannibalistic nature of your eating and drinking of the body and blood of Christ, as you say you take this passage literally. How Gross!! How entirely against the context of this passage does this go.
That's what the Jews were thinking who walked away from Jesus. Note especially his comment under the gospels.

The below is an article from Marty Barrack who has a web site called Second Exodus. He was raised Jewish and has come home to the Catholic Faith.

Tabernacle Sacrifice

Bread of the Presence

The Bread of the Presence, in the ancient Tabernacle and later in the Temple, 1 Kgs 7:48 prefigured Jesus in the Holy Eucharist.

In the Tabernacle God commanded Moses, Ex 25:8 "Let them make me a sanctuary, that I may dwell in their midst." In the sanctuary, in the ark of the covenant, God told Moses, Ex 25:22 "There I will meet with you, and from above the mercy seat, from between the two cherubim that are upon the ark of the testimony, I will speak with you..." God added, Ex 25:30 "You shall set the bread of the Presence on the table before me always." Jesus told us, Mt 28:20 "I am with you always."

Abimelech the priest gave David this sacred bread. 1 Sam 21:6 "So the priest gave him the holy bread; for there was no bread there but the bread of the Presence." Jesus taught us that it was for all His disciples. Mt 12:1 "At that time Jesus went through the grainfields on the sabbath; his disciples were hungry, and they began to pluck ears of grain and to eat. ... [Jesus] said to them, 'Have you not read what David did, when he was hungry, and those who who were with him: how he entered the house of God and ate the bread of the Presence ... I tell you, something greater than the temple is here."

Jesus showed us what was greater than the Temple. Lk 22:19 "He took bread, and when he had given thanks he broke it and gave it to them, saying, 'This is my body which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.'"


Blood of the Lamb
During Moses' time the priests sacrificed in the Tabernacle, a portable house of God in the wilderness. After Solomon built the First Temple, it became the place of sacrifice. The highest form of Hebrew worship was sacrifice, not prayer alone, just as the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is the highest form of Catholic worship. A priest is one who offers sacrifice. The Catholic priest is the counterpart not of the rabbi, but of the ancient Jewish priest who offered bloody sacrifices. The deacon, who reads the Gospel, is the rabbi's counterpart.

The Old Testament sacrifice of a lamb, as opposed to any other animal, was important. The lamb did not resist, run away, or even cry out. Isaiah had foretold that the Lamb of God would do the same, Is 53:7 "He was oppressed, and he was afflicted yet he opened not his mouth; like a lamb that is led to the slaughter, and like a sheep that before its shearers is dumb, so he opened not his mouth."

The Jewish priests, before sacrificing the lamb, always asked, "Do you love this lamb?" If the family didn't love the lamb there would be no sacrifice. Jesus three times asked Peter, Jn 21:15 "Do you love Me?" Jesus allowed Peter to replace his triple denial with a triple affirmation that he did indeed love the Sacrificed Lamb.

The family would place the lamb into the hands of the priest. When we give something to God we place it in His hands. Jesus' last words on the Cross were, Lk 23:46 "Father, into Thy hands I commit My spirit!"

The priest and the head of the family then prayed together that God would accept the blood of the innocent lamb for the sins of that family for the entire year, just as the Lamb of God shed His Blood to redeem the sins of all His human family. The Catholic priest says, "Pray, brethren, that our sacrifice may be acceptable to God, the almighty Father."

The head of household then cut the lamb's throat with a sharp bronze knife while the priest caught the lamb's blood in a large bronze bowl. The priest then made seven complete trips around the altar, sprinkling the blood from the lamb on each of the four "horns." Then he took the lamb's body and placed it on the altar and started the ritual fire. With a big fire and a small lamb, the sacrifice was over quickly. The smoke rose from the altar. If the wind blew the smoke away and dispersed it, the priest told the family that its offer was rejected, and that it should repent and come back the following year. But if the smoke drifted upward, higher and higher until it disappeared from view, the priest told the family that God had accepted the sacrifice.

Before the great tabernacle sacrifice, Jewish priests washed their hands in a bronze laver, or basin. Ps 26:6 "I wash my hands in innocence, and go about Thy altar, O Lord." Today the Catholic priest washes his hands saying inaudibly, Ps 51:2 "Lord, wash away my iniquity; cleanse me from my sin."

The first priest attended at a great golden lampstand with seven oil lamps, called a menorah. It was dark in the tabernacle, and the menorah gave light.

The second priest attended at the table of showbread. God had commanded Lv 24:5 that the Jewish priests, from Aaron forward, place twelve loaves of bread on a golden table "before the Lord." On each sabbath, the priests ate the bread which had been set in place on the preceding sabbath. This bread was to be eaten by the priests in a sacred place since it was Lv 24:9 "most holy" among the offerings to the Lord. God had said, Ex 23:18 "You shall not offer the blood of My sacrifice with leavened bread." During the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass the Catholic priest consecrates unleavened bread on the altar which becomes Christ's Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity, and is consumed by the royal priesthood as the most holy offering in the New and Everlasting Covenant.

The third priest served at the altar of incense. It looked like a small altar of sacrifice, with the same four horns. On it was a bronze laver. The priest would take a red-hot burning ember from the fire in which the lamb had been sacrificed, put it in the basin, and pour some incense on it, that his prayers might have a fragrant scent and go straight up to God. On solemn occasions Catholics spread incense about the altar as an act of reverence and purification. The smoke rising to heaven represents our own desire to have our prayers ascend heavenward in God's sight. Ps 141:2 "Let my prayer be counted as incense before Thee, and the lifting up of my hands as an evening sacrifice."

God told Moses to place the Torah in the Ark of the Covenant, which in turn was placed within a tabernacle. God commanded, Ex 27:20 "You shall command the people of Israel that they bring to you pure beaten olive oil for the light, that a lamp may be set up to burn continually." All was placed within the tabernacle. By night, there was always a fire over the tabernacle, Ex 40:38 This began the idea of an eternal lamp beside the Jewish tabernacle. A thousand years later the Temple lamp miraculously continued to shine for eight days with only one day's supply of oil. Catholics continue this ancient Israelite tradition by placing a lighted candle beside the tabernacle in which the consecrated Hosts repose.

In the center of the tabernacle was a room called the Holy of Holies. Once a year the cohen gadol, the high priest, alone would enter that room. In it was the Ark of the Covenant. Inside the ark were the two stone tablets with the Ten Commandments, a golden bowl of manna, and the five Torah scrolls. The Torah was a witness against the Israelites, Dt 31:26 but above it all was God's solid gold mercy seat, with a crown and two cherubim kneeling in prayer. Above the mercy seat, between the two cherubim, was a brilliant light, the shining glory of God. Ex 25:22 "From above the mercy seat, from between the two cherubim that are upon the ark of the testimony, I will speak with you." When the priest saw that light he took a huge cup of blood and sprinkled it until it was empty. Jewish tradition holds that not one drop of the blood of sacrifice ever touched the mercy seat or the cherubim; it all went into the bright light of God's glory. Jesus said, Jn 8:12 "I am the light of the world." Jesus' covenant family gave Him their imperfect sacrifices, and He gave them His perfect sacrifice.


The Todah Sacrifice

The ancient Jews had a special ritual meal called the Todah (Hebrew: thanks) (pronounce: Taw-DAH). Although the Todah sacrificed an animal, it was greater than other animal sacrifices because it added the suffering of one's own life. David wrote, Ps 40:6,8 "Burnt offering and sin offering Thou hast not required. … I delight to do Thy will, O my God; Thy law is within my heart." Again, David wrote, Ps 51:17 "The sacrifice acceptable to God is a broken spirit." And again, Ps 69:30 "I will praise the name of God with a song; I will magnify Him with thanksgiving. This will please the Lord more than an ox or a bull with horns and hoofs." Isaiah spoke the words of God, Is 1:11 "I have had enough of burnt offerings of rams." God called instead for a baptism: Is 1:16 "Wash yourselves; make yourselves clean; remove the evil of your doings from My eyes; cease to do evil, learn to do good."

The seventy elders who went up with Moses to see God offered the Todah: Ex 24:11 "They beheld God, and ate and drank." Twelve centuries later, twelve apostles beheld God, and ate and drank as Jesus prepared to offer His Todah sacrifice: Lk 22:19 "He took bread, and when He had given thanks He broke it…" From the beginning, Christ's Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity has been called Holy Eucharist (Greek: eucharistia, thanksgiving).

The ancient rabbis believed that when the Messiah would come all sacrifices except the Todah would cease, but the Todah would continue for all eternity. In 70 AD the Temple fell to earth and all of the bloody animal sacrifices stopped. Only the Todah remains, the eucharistia, the Final Sacrifice at which the last words spoken are Todah l'Adonai, "Thanks be to God."


Passover

Jesus was pre-figured in the original Passover, when God commanded that Moses tell the Israelites, Ex 12:5-6 "Your lamb shall be without blemish, a male … the congregation of Israel shall kill their lambs in the evening," as Jesus the Lamb of God was crucified in dim light. Mt 27:45 God commanded, Ex 12:8 "They shall eat the flesh that night," and told Moses, Ex 12:12 "I will smite all the first-born in the land of Egypt." But He promised, Ex 12:13 "The blood shall be a sign for you … when I see the blood, I will pass over you." Most of us know that the original Passover pre-figured the Body and Blood of the crucified Lamb. But there is more to the Passover story.

Pharaoh commanded the death of every Hebrew male infant in Egypt, Ex 1:22 but death passed over Moses. Ex 2:5-10 Twelve centuries later, before Herod commanded the death of every Hebrew male infant in Bethlehem, Mt 2:13 death passed also over Jesus.

The Jewish celebration of Passover has from the beginning been an experience of exile and return, as its participants re-live the experience of the desert and encounter with God. After Jesus was crucified the apostles also experienced a sense of exile in the desert followed by a transforming encounter with God. In this way Jesus is spiritually present in the entire Seder.

The Seder table is different in many ways from the Jewish table setting on all other nights, as the ma nishtano acknowledges. God chose a young Jewish girl, a virgin who lived in Nazareth, to begin the rest of the story. Mary began her own Seder each year as Jews have since time immemorial, by lighting candles to give festive light to the table. Mary also gave us Jesus, the Jn 8:12 light of the world. Jesus has been at every Seder from the first one to this very day, spiritually present in the bread, wine, and lamb.


Bread

Jesus is spiritually present in the bread. It is unleavened, pure as Jesus was pure. It has dark stripes, as His back was striped by Pilate's scourging. It is pierced, as He was pierced on the Cross. Once it was the bread of life for Israel on the desert, as Jesus is the Jn 6:35 Bread of Life for all mankind. During the Seder, the head of the family takes three pieces of unleavened bread, reminding us of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. He breaks in half the second piece, suggesting the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity crucified. He then wraps one of these two pieces, called the afikomen (Hebrew: festival procession), a reminder of Jesus' constant call, "Follow Me," in white linen, reminding us of Jesus linen burial cloth, and "buries" or hides it, as Jesus was entombed. Later the youngest at table "resurrects" or finds the afikomen as Jesus rose from the dead. The head of the family then breaks the afikomen and passes it around for all to eat, as Jesus did when He told His apostles, Lk 22:19 "This is My Body which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of Me." In that way, Jesus through the Seder calls us to follow Him into His death and resurrection, to become a new person in Christ.

The unleavened bread also reminds us of the haste with which the Israelites left Egypt. The dough that they were sunbaking on the hot rocks of the Egyptian fields was removed before it could leaven, and so remained flat. It represents our need to remain ever alert and prepared for the day when God calls us to our destiny as Jesus told us, Mt 25:13 "Watch, therefore, for you know neither the day nor the hour."


Wine

Jesus is spiritually present in the wine. When the afikomen is broken and passed around for all to eat, Jews drink the third of four cups of wine, called the cup of blessing because it represents the blood of the sacrificed paschal lamb. It is the cup that Jesus gave to His apostles, saying, Lk 22:20 "This cup which is poured out for you is the New Covenant in My Blood." He did not drink the fourth, the Kalah cup, explaining, Mt 26:29 "I tell you I shall not drink again of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdom." But later that evening at Gethsemane, Jesus prayed by moonlight, Mt 26:39 "Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from Me." After He was captured, Jesus asked Peter, Jn 18:11 "Shall I not drink the cup the Father has given Me?" Many Catholics believe that Jesus drank the last cup on the Cross, Jn 19:29 "They put a sponge full of the vinegar on hyssop and held it to His mouth. When Jesus had received the vinegar, He said, 'It is finished'; and He bowed His head and gave up His spirit."


Lamb

Pasch or pesach in Hebrew means "he passed over." The paschal lamb recalls the lamb that was sacrificed that its blood might be daubed on the doorposts of every Jewish home, and its body eaten in every Jewish home, that the angel of death might know it as a household of the faithful and pass over. God had originally commanded Ex 12:6 that the whole assembly of the congregation of Israel kill the paschal lambs. When Solomon built the first Temple, Jewish priests sacrificed the paschal lambs there. But after Jesus ascended to heaven and the second Temple fell never to rise again, the Temple sacrifices could no longer be done, so Jews began to represent the paschal lamb with a lamb's shank bone.

Jesus is spiritually present in the shank bone of the lamb. The Jews in Egypt ate the paschal lamb to be physically redeemed and led to the promised land of Canaan. Catholics for two thousand years have consumed the Body and Blood of the Lamb of God, Jn 1:29 that we might be spiritually redeemed and find the promised kingdom of heaven.

In the ancient days, when the Jewish priest had killed the last lamb of the Passover, he uttered the Hebrew word Kalah, "it is finished." Moments before He died on the Cross, Jesus said, Jn 19:30 Kalah (it is finished).


The Exodus

After the Passover, with its pre-figuration of Calvary, the Israelite people began their long exodus from the land of Egypt to the promised land of Canaan. God told Moses, Ex 16:4 "I will rain bread from heaven for you; and the people shall go out and gather a day's portion every day, that I may prove them, whether they will walk in my law or not." Moses told the Israelites, Ex 16:8 "When the Lord gives you in the evening flesh and in the morning bread to the full…" The "bread from heaven" reminds us of Christ's words, Jn 6:49 "Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness and they died. This is the bread which comes down from heaven, that a man may eat of it and not die." The "evening flesh" reminds us of Christ's sacrifice. Mt 27:45, 50 "Now from the sixth hour there was darkness over all the land until the ninth hour. … And Jesus cried again with a loud voice and yielded up his spirit." The "morning bread" reminds us of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.

The Israelites gathered up the manna, Ex 16:17 "…some more, some less. But when they measured it with an omer, he that gathered much had nothing over, and he that gathered little had no lack; each gathered according to what he could eat." This reminds us of the Miracle of the Loaves and Fishes, Mt 15:37 "And they all ate and were satisfied." That miracle pre-figured the Holy Eucharist, from which the smallest piece is a full portion of Christ's Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity, and which can never run out because Jesus said He would be with us until the end of time. Mt 28:20 As long as a priest lives we Christ's flock can have all we want.


Elijah

At a time when the land parched from lack of rain, God sent Elijah the Tishbite to the brook Cherith, that is east of the river Jordan, promising, 1 Kgs 17:4 "You shall drink from the brook, and I have commanded the ravens to feed you there." So Elijah went. 1 Kgs 17:6 "And the ravens brought him bread and meat in the morning, and bread and meat in the evening; and he drank from the brook."

When the brook dried up God sent Elijah to Zarepath, saying, 1 Kgs 17:9 "Behold, I have commanded a widow there to feed you." Elijah found the widow and asked her, 1 Kgs 17:10 "Bring me a morsel of bread in your hand." The widow and her son had virtually no food left and were near starvation. 1 Kgs 17:12 "As the Lord lives," she said, "I have nothing baked, only a handful of meal in a jar, and a little oil in a cruse; and now, I am gathering a couple of sticks, that I may go in and prepare it for myself and my son, that we may eat it, and die."

But Elijah told her, 1 Kgs 17:13 "Fear not; go and do as you have said; but first make me a little cake of it and bring it to me, and afterward make for yourself and your son. For thus says the Lord the God of Israel, 'The jar of meal shall not be spent, and the cruse of oil shall not fail, until the day that the Lord sends rain upon the earth." The widow did as Elijah said, and she and her son and Elijah ate for many days. 1 Kgs 17:16 "The jar of meal was not spent, neither did the cruse of oil fail, according to the word of the Lord which he spoke by Elijah."

After that, the woman's son became ill and died. Elijah carried the woman's son into the upper room where he had been living and prayed, 1 Kgs 17:21 "Oh Lord my God, let this child's soul come into him again." 1 Kgs 17:22 "And the Lord hearkened to the voice of Elijah; and the soul of the child came into him again, and he revived."

The food brought by the ravens reminds us of the manna, which itself pre-figured the Miracle of the Loaves and Fishes. The ravens brought bread, which pre-figured Christ's Holy Eucharist, and meat, which pre-figured His redemptive sacrifice. The water from the brook which kept Elijah alive pre-figured the living water that flowed from Christ's side. At Zarepath, Elijah was again fed by a pre-figure of the Miracle of the Loaves and Fishes. The widow pre-figures our Blessed Mother, who was a widow on the day of Christ's sacrifice. Her son pre-figures Christ, who died and rose from the dead.

In the wilderness Elijah was awakened by an angel's touch. 1 Kgs 19:6 "There was at his head a cake baked on hot stones and a jar of water." The cake reminds us of the Holy Eucharist. The water, of the water that Jesus turned to wine at Cana Jn 2:9 and then to the Blood of the Covenant in Jerusalem. Mt 26:27 The angel told Elijah, 1 Kgs 19:7 "Arise and eat, else the journey will be too great for you." Elijah took this food for his forty days' journey to Horeb, the mountain of God. Jesus fasted forty days in the wilderness while He was tempted by the devil. Mt 4:1 Lest temptation be too great for us, we receive the Holy Eucharist, food for our pilgrim journey to Calvary, the new and true mountain of God.

Finally, Elijah 2 Kgs 2:11 "was carried up in a whirlwind into the sky," as Jesus Lk 24:51 "was carried up into heaven."


Elisha


God performed a miracle through the prophet Elisha. 2 Kgs 4:42 "A man came from Baal-shalishah, bringing the man of God bread of the first fruits, twenty loaves of barley, and fresh ears of grain in his sack. And Elisha said, 'Give to the men, that they may eat.' But his servant said, 'How am I to set this before a hundred men?' So he repeated, 'Give them to the men, that they may eat, for thus says the Lord, ‘They shall eat and have some left.’ So he set it before them. And they ate, and had some left, according to the word of the Lord."

Elisha's miraculous feeding of a hundred men pre-figured Jesus' Miracle of the Loaves and Fishes.


The Psalms

Jews two thousand years ago knew the 150 psalms by heart, as we know songs today. They were not numbered; they were identified by their first words. If the first words, or any words, from a psalm were quoted, a Jew would be able to quote the rest of it.

Jesus cry on the Cross, Mt 22:46 "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me," reminded those present that His sacrifice fulfilled prophecy. Psalm 22 begins, "My God, my God, why has thou forsaken me?" The Jews present on Calvary would have recited from memory the prophetic words, Ps 22:17 "I can count all my bones – they stare and gloat over me; they divide my garments among them, and for my raiment they cast lots."

The Jews present would have recognized Jesus' final words on the Cross as a Psalm quotation, Ps 31:5, "Into Thy hand I commit my spirit," and recited from memory King David's next words, "Thou hast redeemed me, O Lord, faithful God." They would have continued reciting the psalm until its final words, "Be strong, and let your heart take courage, all you who wait for the Lord!"

Psalm 23 contains the Eucharistic prophecy, Ps 23:5 "Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of my enemies." As we eat what God gives us, we will fear no evil but dwell in the house of the Lord forever.

Psalm 78 refers to the manna. Ps 78:24 "[God] rained down upon them manna to eat, and gave them the grain of heaven."


Ezekiel

God pre-figured the Holy Eucharist through the prophet Ezekiel. Ez 3:3 "'Son of man, eat this scroll that I give you and fill your stomach with it.' Then I ate it; and it was in my mouth as sweet as honey." Jesus often used the title, Son of Man, in Matthew 8:20, 12:32, 13:41, 16:27 and 17:9. God had called Ezekiel to eat a figure of the Word of God made flesh.

The Gospels
The New Testament accounts describe the Holy Eucharist as Jesus gave it to us. The term "bread from heaven" becomes fully clear only when we reach the Revelation to John. The Gospels Christ said at Capernaum. Jn 6:51 "I am the living bread which came down from heaven; if any one eats of this bread, he will live for ever; and the bread which I shall give for the life of the world is My Flesh."

Jewish life is rich in symbolism. The Seder table is filled with symbolic foods. Jesus said, Mt 26:23 "He who has dipped his hand in the dish with Me, will betray Me." He referred to the urhatz, the first washing; slaves eat quickly without stopping to wash their hands, but now Jews wash their hands in a bowl of warm water as a symbol of their freedom. The moror, bitter herbs which remind Jews that the Egyptians made their ancestors' lives bitter with hard labor, are dipped in charoset, a sweet mixture of chopped apples, nuts, and wine, to recall that even hard lives have their sweet moments. The matzo is the bread of haste that the Hebrews ate as they fled from Egypt. The karpas, green vegetables, represent the coming of Spring with its renewal of life, symbolizing the journey from slavery to the promised land; Jews dip them in salt water before eating to recall the tears shed along the way. If Jesus had said the Holy Eucharist was a symbol the Jews at Capernaum would instantly have accepted it.

The Jews knew that He was speaking literally. Jn 6:52 "How can this man give us his Flesh to eat?" On other occasions when our Lord spoke of Himself as a Jn 10:9 "door" or a Jn 15:1 "vine," nobody said, "How can this man be made of wood?" or "How can this man be a plant?" They recognized these as metaphors. But when Jesus insisted, Jn 6:53 "Unless you eat the Flesh of the Son of man and drink His Blood, you have no life in you; he who eats My Flesh and drinks My Blood has eternal life." The Jews who heard this said, Jn 6:60 "This is a hard saying; who can listen to it?" They remembered God's command to Noah and all mankind, Gn 9:4 "Only you shall not eat flesh with its life, that is, its blood." God spoke more forcefully to His chosen people. Lv 17:10 "I will set my face against that person who eats blood, and will cut him off from among his people." It was only after Christ's redemptive sacrifice and the Holy Spirit's enlightenment that the Apostles saw the full meaning of our Father's next words. Lv 17:11 "For the life of the flesh is in the blood; and I have given it for you upon the altar to make atonement for your souls; for it is the blood that makes atonement, by reason of the life." In the Old Covenant our Father in heaven had commanded His children not to eat the blood of animals because we are not to participate in the life of animals. Animals, having no immortal souls, are lower than man in the order of created nature. However, in the New and Everlasting Covenant we consume the Blood of Christ to participate in Christ's eternal life.

Jesus knew we would need a lot of help to become accustomed to the Holy Eucharist. He performed the Miracle of the Loaves and Fishes in the dim light of the original Passover sacrifice Ex 12:6 and of His Crucifixion. Mt 27:45 He performed the four great Eucharistic actions: He took the bread, blessed it, broke it, and gave it to His apostles to feed the people: Mt 14:15 "When it was evening, the disciples came to him and said, 'This is a lonely place, and the day is now over; send the crowds away to go into the villages and buy food for themselves.' Jesus said, 'They need not go away; you give them something to eat.' They said to him, 'We have only five loaves here and two fish.' And he said, 'Bring them here to me.' Then he ordered the crowds to sit down on the grass; and taking the five loaves and the two fish he looked up to heaven, and blessed, and broke and gave the loaves to the disciples, and the disciples gave them to the crowds. And they all ate and were satisfied. And they took up twelve baskets full of the broken pieces left over."

The three Gospel narratives of the Last Supper are absolutely consistent. Matthew: 26:26 "This is My Body." 26:27 "This is My Blood…" Mark: 14:22 "This is My Body." 14:24 "This is My Blood…" Luke: 22:19 "This is My Body." 22:20 "This … is the New Covenant in My Blood." Jesus' next words instituted the Catholic priesthood: Lk 22:19 "Do this in remembrance of Me."

Jesus assured the Apostles that the Holy Eucharist is a reflection of the heavenly banquet. Mt 26:29 "I tell you I shall not drink again of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdom."

After His resurrection, Jesus walked with two disciples to Emmaus. When they arrived, He celebrated the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass for them; Lk 24:30 "While He was at table with them, He took the bread and blessed, and broke it, and gave it to them."


Acts of the Apostles

The apostles celebrated the Sacrament of Holy Eucharist. Acts 2:46 "Day by day, attending the Temple together and breaking bread in their homes…"

The Apostles were visibly religious Jews. They wore the kippah (prayer hat), the tallit (prayer shawl with fringes) and the tephillin (phylacteries). Long after Jesus ascended to the Father, Peter protested that he had never in his life eaten anything unkosher. Acts 10:14 When these Jewish Apostles remembered Christ's command, Lk 22:19 "Do this in remembrance of Me," they added it to their synagogue worship. They began with synagogue prayer and Scripture readings, and then went to their homes to celebrate the Sacrament of Christ's Body and Blood. To this very day, the Introductory Rite and Liturgy of the Word come directly from Jewish synagogue worship. The Liturgy of the Eucharist comes directly from the Apostles' breaking bread in their homes.

At Troas, Paul spoke all night, but he made sure to receive the Holy Eucharist. Acts 20:7 "On the first day of the week, when we were gathered together to break bread, Paul talked with them, intending to depart on the morrow; and he prolonged his speech until midnight." Acts 20:11 "And when Paul had gone up and had broken bread and eaten, he conversed with them a long while, until daybreak, and so departed."

On the Adriatic Sea, at dawn, Paul celebrated Mass for 276 people. Acts 27:35 "...he took bread, and giving thanks to God in the presence of all he broke it and began to eat. Then they all were encouraged and ate some food themselves."


The Epistles

Acts 20:11 "When Paul had gone up and had broken bread and eaten…" St. Paul explained clearly what "breaking bread" meant. 1 Cor 10:16 "The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not a participation in the Blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the Body of Christ?" St. Paul continued, 1 Cor 11:27 "Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the Body and Blood of the Lord." St. Paul in these words confirmed Catholic teaching that the "bread … of the Lord" is truly Christ's Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity, and that the "cup of the Lord" is the same substance: "Whoever … eats the bread or drinks the cup … will be guilty of profaning the Body and Blood of the Lord."

St. Paul added, 1 Cor 11:29 "For any one who eats and drinks without discerning the Body eats and drinks judgment upon himself." If we receive the Holy Eucharist without acknowledging, at least in our hearts, that it is His true Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity, we send ourselves to hell.


The Revelation to John

In the beginning God had said of marriage, Gen 2:24 "Therefore a man … cleaves to his wife, and they become one flesh." Jesus assured us, Jn 6:56 "He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him." God prepared us first through natural marriage and then through the Holy Eucharist for the supernatural marriage to come at the end of time, Rev 20:7 "For the marriage of the Lamb has come, and his Bride [the Church] has made herself ready; it was granted her to be clothed in … the righteous deeds of the saints." The Holy Eucharist, through which Christ abides in us and we in Him, will be our wedding feast. Rev 19:9 "Blessed are those who are invited to the marriage supper of the Lamb."

[ June 28, 2005, 08:19 AM: Message edited by: Living4Him ]
 

john6:63

New Member
Originally posted by DHK:
Not true. He did with some of the parables, not with all of them. For example:

Matthew 13:44-50 Again, the kingdom of heaven is like unto treasure hid in a field; the which when a man hath found, he hideth, and for joy thereof goeth and selleth all that he hath, and buyeth that field.
45 Again, the kingdom of heaven is like unto a merchant man, seeking goodly pearls:
46 Who, when he had found one pearl of great price, went and sold all that he had, and bought it.
47 Again, the kingdom of heaven is like unto a net, that was cast into the sea, and gathered of every kind:
48 Which, when it was full, they drew to shore, and sat down, and gathered the good into vessels, but cast the bad away.
49 So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just,
50 And shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.

Where is the interpretation of all of these parables? Let me give you a hint. There is none.
Read on DHK, you have your answer WHY Jesus didn’t explain Himself, b/c in verse 51 Jesus asks if they (His disciples) understood the parable. His disciples responded …Yea, Lord.

Why would Jesus need to explain a parable to His disciples that already understood?

Originally posted by DHK:
Tell me John, have you become a Catholic?
No
 

Doubting Thomas

Active Member
DHK, I know this response will probably be wasted effort, because you really have a hard time grasping what many of us are saying, and you seem unwilling to actually consider the facts, but here goes...

Originally posted by DHK:
And what other choice do we have? Either the passage is literal or it is not. If it neither one of these then one can only conclude that you are a gnostic with some special higher knowledge. Please let us know. If it is not literal it obviously symbolic, and was spoken as a metaphor. There remains no other choice.
Again you remain committed to the logical fallacy of the false dilemma. You suppose that if Christ isn't talking about crass cannibalism (ie chewing the flesh right off his body) and vampirism (ie drinking the blood right out of his veins, that he must be only talking strictly metaphorically without any realism whatsover. As has been explained to you countless times, Christ is not up in heaven getting his flesh chewed up or his blood drained from his veins during communion, but you persist in making this mocking caricature rather than trying to interact with the true doctrine of the real presence. Your response is like that of the unbelieving Jews: "How can he give us his flesh to eat?". If they would have stuck around, they would have learned with the apostles that the bread and wine is His body and blood, and that is how He could give themselves for our nourishment without participating in crass cannibalism. And this is what all ordinary Christians accepted by faith for the first 1500 years of Christianity without having to be privy to some "higher gnostic knowledge". It was the gnostics who rejected the real presence.

You are entitled to your opinion; but it is wrong. Jesus never got literal at all. I already demonstrated that for you. He used symbolic and metaphoric language stratight through the whole chapter.
Actually, it is correct as I will demonstrate.

There was already a known metaphorical sense among the Jews in which "eat my flesh" could be understood as the idea "eat flesh" was in some Bible passages conveying the idea of "reviling or attacking" (see Ps.27:2 "the wicked come against me to eat up my flesh"; and Micah 3:3 "who also eat the flesh of My people"). So for the Jews to understand Christ in the common metaphorical sense, He would have to be saying: "If anyone reviles or attacks Me he will live forever" and "unless you revile the Son of Man you have no life in you." Yet obviously this metaphorical meaning didn't make sense to the Jews prompting them to ask: "How can this Man give us His flesh to eat?"(v.52). Instead of correcting their misunderstanding by introducing a new metaphor, Jesus continues to speak literally and in fact becomes more literal in v.54 when He switches from (Greek)"phago", which means simply "to eat" to the more graphic "trogo" which means "to crunch, eat, chew". The only hint of clarification is that He mentions that He will visibly ascend back to the Father (v.62), so while they must indeed "eat His flesh and drink His blood", it's not in the crass cannibalistic way in which the Jews are thinking (v.63). In other words He's going to ascend intact without chunks of His body missing(!).

It is this realism (not cannibalism!) that the Church was unanimous in affirming for its first millenium-and-a-half.

This is a false statement. Many of the early church fathers denied transubstantiation, just as they denied baptismal regeneration.
Oh really? Name one church father who denied the truth of the real presence in the eucharist or regeneration in baptism? (This ought to be good... :cool: )
 

D28guy

New Member
Living4him,

Your recent posts with all these quotes in them are a great example to the truthfulness of the scriptures.

The scriptures make clear that even as the scriptures were being inscripturated savage wolves and false teachers were already infiltrating the body of Christ seeking to plant seeds of error and heresy in with the truth.

And it didnt take long for those errors to be believed and spread, thats for sure.

And DHK didnt say that ALL the early christians denied the real presence, only that many did.

God bless,

Mike
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
Doubting Thomas said --
Again you remain committed to the logical fallacy of the false dilemma. You suppose that if Christ isn't talking about crass cannibalism (ie chewing the flesh right off his body) and vampirism (ie drinking the blood right out of his veins, that he must be only talking strictly metaphorically without any realism whatsover. As has been explained to you countless times, Christ is not up in heaven getting his flesh chewed up or his blood drained from his veins during communion,
Actually - "the problem" in the dialogue on John 6 is invariably the refusal of RC posters to pay attention to the details of the Gospel accounts on the subject of Christ's use of the symbols.

"Details" typically ignored in the Catholic argument --

#1. In John 6 Christ DOES NOT say "some day in the future my FLESH WILL become food" nor "some day in the not too distant future my blood WILL BECOME drink"!! He argues that IT ALREADY IS!! Right then and THERE that the bread ALREADY came down from heaven AND ALREADY those who would have eternal life must be eating His Flesh!!

The RC argument "NEEDS" the text to say "SOME day in the NEAR future my flesh WILL become food for you to really eat". It does not!!

#2. Christ is on record as chastizing the disciples for taking the symbol of bread TOO LITERALLY!! IN Matt 16 He argues that it represents TEACHING and they thought it was REALLY BREAD!!

#3. ONLY the FAITHLESS discples of John 6 take him soooo literally that they think they must BITE CHRIST!!

#4. Christ HIMSELF offers the "interpretation" by saying that LITERAL FLESH "is WORTHLESS" when eaten -- but it is HIS WORD digested in the soul that has REAL true LIFE!!.

#5. In the entire John 6 discussion the ENTIRE POINT of the Flesh and blood is to gain "LIFE". Then Christ shows that for gaining LIFE - ONLY HIS WORD has SPIRIT AND LIFE and that literal flesh is WORTHLESS (in terms of literally eating something and having it make you live forever)!!

#7 In John 1 - the CONTEXT is established "THE WORD BECAME FLESH" in John 6 the point is made again that the BREAD of heaven CAME DOWN as in the case of manna in the days of Moses. (Where we see that EVEN Moses argues the point using the SAME symbol of BREAD coming down from heaven - "MAN shall NOT live by bread alone but by EVERY WORD that proceeds from the Mouth of God" Deut 8:3]

Deut 8:3
3 "He humbled you and let you be hungry, and fed you with manna which you did not know, nor did your fathers know, that He might make you understand that man does not live by bread alone, but man lives by everything that proceeds out of the mouth of the LORD.
Christ appeals to this SAME symbol in John 6 -- bread coming down out of heaven AS in the days of Moses!

#8. When Peter speaks about the faithful disciple’s view in John 6:68 he simply RESTATES Christ’s OWN interpretation given in vs 63 saying “YOU have the Words of LIFE” – he says nothing about “we have decided to stay and bite you” as instructed. NOR does he say “we have decided to stay and WAIT for that FUTURE day when you WILL have life in your flesh so we can bite it”.

In Christ,

Bob

[ June 28, 2005, 03:54 PM: Message edited by: BobRyan ]
 
Top