"What is your factual basis for calling Bishop Strossmeyer's speech a forgery?"
This version you mean? Yes this one is a forgery.
There is a real Strossmayer speech that was delivered at Vatican I .
It just happens to have been a completely different speech than the one on that website.
Yes, I've read them both.
"Are you saying that if there is one mistake on a website, that everything on that website must be wrong?"
In cases of wellknown forgeries being represented like thruth, like this one I get very suspicious about the rest of a website.
"Given your superior educational attainments and your knowledge of church history, are you saying the priest who got saved and left the RCC is a fake?"
This priest? I've got no idea. There is something of an American cottage industry when it comes to fake former nuns&priests.
Which is strange 'cause there are plenty of real ones around.
"Are you saying someone posted only part of the speech?"
No this is the whole forgery.
"Are you saying someone rewrote or reworded what the Bishop actually said?"
No the forgery was made up out of whole cloth and does not resemble the original in the slightest.
"Are you saying someone made it all up and it never really happened?"
I claim somebody decided that they could give a better speech than Strossmayer and made up his own version.
"I notice you make this claim from time to time on the BB.
What is the factual basis for your claim so we can check out your accusation? "
http://www.bautz.de/bbkl/s/s4/strossmayer_j_j.shtml
http://www.angelfire.com/ms/seanie/strossmayer.html
For starters...