Charlie Sheen Questions 911 official story

Does this prove that 80% of the people who watch the Clinton News Network are as nutty as Sheen? YES!

 

The fact that the towers were hit shows that it was indeed an act of terrorism against the people of the united states of america.

Now we need to find out if the ones who are being blamed are the terrorists who proported the act of violence against our shores.

Just because they were celebrating in the streets in afghanistan does not necessarily mean they were the guilty ones.

Truth be known, there were people here in the united states that were laughing and carrying on that awful day.

 

Yes, SFIC, there was a woman murdered who was to testify - she had given illegal aliens driver's licenses in Tennessee and some of those had gone to the WTC. I'm sketchy on the details, but the story was right after 09/11 and the woman was killed in a fiery auto crash which was suspicious before she was to testify, I think it was. ANYWAY, something about imploding the WTC in this long-forgotten news item. I've always felt the WTC looked like implosions, too, in fact, exactly like implosions.

There is more to this than meets the eye. Too bad we didn't have a REAL 09/11 commission to get to the bottom of it. But we aren't meant to know the truth, for that just might change EVERYTHING, you see, in this so-called war on terror.

 

Ah, here's one story about it:

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/LAW/02/15/inv.licenser.death/

 

Interesting article. And the death certainly does look suspicious

 

The reason the building appeared to implode is because it was built using cantilever construction, meaning that it was supported by central beams. Any building constructed in this way will fail rapidly when exposed to fire. An article in Atlantic Monthly says that the fires were started by jet fuel, but that the main source of heat was the fires that the fuel started. In other words: tons of paper.

 

In 1996 the RTCA (Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics) conducted a study on cellphone use in aircraft. The director of that study, John Sheehan, who is also a certified pilot, noted that cell phones are regularly used on private and corporate planes "thousands of times every day" without incident. He says he has dialed from the air on many occasions.

 

Besides, who ever got dialtone on a cellphone? They don't have it.

 

Ive placed several stealthy cell phone calls from 30 thousand feet in the air. And I live on a small island in the Pacific. Might want to switch cell phone companies.

Chucky Sheen? The one who consistently is removed from his own home because his wife and children cant deal with his philandering? First of all, he should know that I pretty much dont care that he is immoral, just stay away from me. Second, to use the smoke and mirrors approach to deflect the attention off of himself by pointing at a topic that he is hardly qualified to make earth shattering commentary on is nothing but mildly amusing. In a few years, he can pop his teeth out for all the kids at the park, scare them off, and go back to sleep on his park bench.

 

I have tested the ability of placing cellphone calls from my house, and I can rarely get service, but it works fine from the car and various parkinglots. I've tested this with two different carriers and more than one make of phone. Therefore, I conclude that nobody can make calls from their own home.

 

And yes, aliens and/or Russians are coming, Lee Harvey Oswald was framed, Black UN helicopters, Aliens crashed in Roswell, etc, etc.

"I once thought that humankind's capacity for self-delusion to be vast, but I have found that it is in fact infinite." -??

All conspiracy theorists should familiarize themselves with Occam's Razor before subjecting the rest of us to their inanity.

ETA: And the moon landing was faked in a Hollywood soundstage!!

 

What? Did they go to services at the Holy Grail of the Movie Industry and change their minds? WHO CARES!

 

No I dont have a hard time believing that people drink the koolaid, after all you do have the same red moustache so that makes you all easy to spot.

This is dumb. Charlie Sheen in dumb. And you are wasting God's time. I doubt Sheen even considers God at all, and therefore you should be interested in not making him your leader.

 

Mark Twain </font>[/QUOTE]Yeah. Except you dont have a cause except to hear your own hollow voice. Not much valiant effort in that. Oh, nobody hates you, you are just silly.

 

The reason the building appeared to implode is because it was built using cantilever construction, meaning that it was supported by central beams. Any building constructed in this way will fail rapidly when exposed to fire. An article in Atlantic Monthly says that the fires were started by jet fuel, but that the main source of heat was the fires that the fuel started. In other words: tons of paper. </font>[/QUOTE]http://www.physics911.net/reynolds.htm


First, no steel-framed skyscraper, even engulfed in flames hour after hour, had ever collapsed before. Suddenly, three stunning collapses occur within a few city blocks on the same day, two allegedly hit by aircraft, the third not. These extraordinary collapses after short-duration minor fires made it all the more important to preserve the evidence, mostly steel girders, to study what had happened. On fire intensity, consider this benchmark: A 1991 FEMA report on Philadelphia’s Meridian Plaza fire said that the fire was so energetic that "eams and girders sagged and twisted," but "[d]espite this extraordinary exposure, the columns continued to support their loads without obvious damage" (quoted by Griffin, p. 15). Such an intense fire with consequent sagging and twisting steel beams bears no resemblance to what we observed at the WTC.

 

The one thing I've never been able to believe is that the U.S. air defense is so pathetically inept as to allow these commercial airliners to hit our two most important cities. Does everybody feel safe at night knowing that our air defenses are this weak?