Charlie Sheen Questions 911 official story

Wait. You wanted a US commercial jetliner to be shot out of the sky? Dont take any vacations via plane. You might be mistaken for a hijacked jetliner and shot down, remains landing in a school yard somewhere between your house and Disney World. That's a nice thought.

Id feel safe thinking qualified personnel were operating the planes that fly over our heads at all altitudes at all hours of the day. Id feel safe thinking that if someone were to whip out some car keys and start slitting throats of passengers and crew, some noble person would stand up to them. You asked. </font>[/QUOTE]And you WANTED for 3,000 people to die in the WTC rather than have the two planes carrying maybe 100 people to be shot down if necessary?? I don't understand your logic. </font>[/QUOTE]I didnt want it to happen at all. Understand THAT logic?

No hijacking, no shooting down jetliners, no ramming planes into buildings. Get it?

Five years later almost is a tad bit late to be monday morning quarterbacking. Life has definitely changed in this country. Some people were made stronger and became more resolute to stop this madness. And some constantly look for ways to blame someone. Which are you?

 

LE..LE..LE...tsk tsk tsk.

You really should check your sources. The Major in that picture? Yeah that isnt who your ironclad newssource claims it is. That is just to start. I leave you to use that conspiracy mind of yours to figure out the rest. (HINT: you can google all of that...its easy!)

If there was ANY discharge of ordnance, there would be inquiries and hearings, the 'pilot' would have been ordered to make statements in front of Congress, especially if he hit anything civilian. As it is...the discharge of ordnance is not an ordinary thing. This stuff *is* inventoried for goodness sake. And everyone of us Americans are taxpayers, to whom each and everyone of us military are to answer to. So why arent you asking that question? If you really and truly believe this pablum, then why arent you pressing the government to answer up? I guess its easier to just make a website.

 

Im certain there are meds for that.

Are we at 10 pages yet? Charlie Sheen and his illuminating evidence has burned itself out.

 

The inertia of our excessively huge federal Government, and the fact that we have three branches of government make the current situation no single presidents "fault"...

Mistakes coupled with inertia have a bad habit of turning to a fragile weak stone foundation...

That until something collapses no one in government seems willing to address any of the precedences...

Yes, I firmly believe Clinton set us up for a fall...

But, the fact that an adversary took office and expected to be told the whole truth and nothing but the truth seems a little naive, to me...

So, both presidents *administrations* bear some of the blame for any messes we are in now...

I vote for close, too

 

It will be closed on page 10. I'm glad to see so much evidence that the Official Government Story is the one we are to believe, complete with so many links. Tsk. Tsk.

 

Are we there yet?
Are we there yet?
Are we there yet?

 

Shoot not yet.

Okay. You want evidence on how Charlie Sheen is right? Prove first that he actually has the ability to think first, without letting that little devil on his shoulder tell him what to say. Bet his wife might be happier with him, and hey! He might get some respect from doubters like me.

Yeah I do doubt him, but not because he stands against the President or the government. But because he has to be the leader of an entire tribe of idiots to think that five years later, and much discussion by people in more informed positions, that his hat thrown into the ring makes my life any different or yours for that matter.

You posted blogs for evidence, which are nothing but a forum to help a lot of people express a whole lot of crazy and fragmented theories. I have trouble caring for one reason: it doesnt change anything. If this illuminating evidence that was brought to us by your awe inspiring leader Sheen could make all these people come back to life, make all those buildings stand again, and keep those planes in the air - then I would be the first to lead the charge to do whatever he says. So pardon me while I sit, surely not alone and if so, whoopie, and watch the fence for al queda, wishing I had your life where I could go to the mattresses over Charlie Sheen.

I know two things. There is a God who knows everything, and Charlie Sheen is not him.

Prayers.

 

Lighting, video quality, and video format (RGB vs. NTSC) all play a part in how a person appears on videotape.

 

Any dates and reference points for those various photographs? Any word on whether bin Ladin had undergone dialysis before either set? Beyond this, note the similarity in beard coloration, and the shape of the nose. The photo on the left is of bin Ladin in a full smile, which will distort the perception of nose length. If he has kidney problems, which is as I understand it the case, bloating is not at all out of the question. Thus the perceived width of the nose is accounted for. Lighting and video quality will account for skin tone differences.

 

http://www.namibian.com.na/2002/January/world/023DF0F0B0.html

Not sure how reliable this one is, though...

Some people do have rapid weight loss and gain...

So, it is 'possible' that Bin Laden went through a weight gain and loss cycle...

 

If we hurry we can fill it in before "Go Home" time!

 

10-page warning: This thread will be closed no sooner than 10:15 p.m. ET by one of the moderators.

Lady Eagle,
Moderator

 

YAY!!!!!

 

Funny how we know so much about bin Ladin.

Always walks with a cane? Always gestures with the same hand? Didn't have an injury to his dominant hand when the tape was made?

We can't find him to kill him, but conspiracy theorists know what brand of boxers he wears... fascinating.